I have never voted for Obama; honestly have never liked dude at all.Y'all nikkas can laugh if you want to. Plenty of white people rock with him. They'll gladly take West over an Obama any day. Seeing how y'all nikkas probably voted for that clown twice I don't know how much room y'all have to stand on. Just saying.....
Don't think the Republicans aren't going through their roster and seeing who they can pull out for 2016. Laugh like people who've been in the military don't carry weight when it comes to politics. They eat that up. There's a couple million people in the country who would easily disagree with you.
I am unsure why people think she would win the election like she has any type of election, movement, or following. She's just there like she always has been. I am fairly certain the Democrats can present someone better; she would possibly get washed by Chris Christie or even Jeb Bush.
Not saying Jeb couldn't beat her, but chill. He definitely ain't destroying ain't her. That's just crazy talk.
this is so fukking stupid
The strongest thing Hillary has going for her is the idea of "making history again" that will be in some voters minds.
A lot of people are not going to be interested in going from the first black president to a return to yet another old white guy so they will want to be a part of history again by electing the first woman president.
Y'all nikkas can laugh if you want to. Plenty of white people rock with him. They'll gladly take West over an Obama any day. Seeing how y'all nikkas probably voted for that clown twice I don't know how much room y'all have to stand on. Just saying.....
Don't think the Republicans aren't going through their roster and seeing who they can pull out for 2016. Laugh like people who've been in the military don't carry weight when it comes to politics. They eat that up. There's a couple million people in the country who would easily disagree with you.
But good luck, Elizabeth Warren might unseat her because Hillary isn't really liberal/progressive as she appears to be.
hillary is bad, but there is no way a republican is going to wash her. she went head-to-head with obama based off old white women and college feminists. those two groups are massive enough, then add the minority vote and she has a built in advantage. she is a juggernaut, and if it werent for the strength of obama in '08, we would be living in a two term hillary world right now. as a matter of fact, demographics will have gotten worse for republicans in 2016 than they were in 2012
Collectively, the latino vote has historically went overwhelmingly Dem, so what are you talking about?Built iority vote if you mean Blacks will vote Democrat even if Hitler Jr were running. That doesn't say anything about Hillary, that just speaks to the current straight-vote of Blacks. And it's not certain, anyway, if nikkas say fukk it and don't vote.
As for 'demographics have gotten worse', I believe that's orange echo chamber talk. The only demographics which have really changed are hispanics, and people lump all hispanics together as if they were blacks -- or worse, as if they were all illegal Mexicans -- at their folly. Democrats are gonna learn about the latino vote. They gonna learn.
Better to start treating the 'latin' vote like the Cuban vote, the Mexican vote, the Puerto Rican vote, the Dominican vote, the South American immigrant vote, the indio vote.
(Nobody cares about the Irish vote or the Italian vote or the Polish vote anymore, because of absorption. Will the same happen with the 'latin' vote?)
we already have hitler jrs and so many of them are on the right wing that we either vote dem, or in the case of thad cochran, we vote for the least hitlerish republican. that's american politics 101, brehBuilt in minority vote if you mean Blacks will vote Democrat even if Hitler Jr were running. That doesn't say anything about Hillary, that just speaks to the current straight-vote of Blacks. And it's not certain, anyway, if nikkas say fukk it and don't vote.
As for 'demographics have gotten worse', I believe that's orange echo chamber talk. The only demographics which have really changed are hispanics, and people lump all hispanics together as if they were blacks -- or worse, as if they were all illegal Mexicans -- at their folly. Democrats are gonna learn about the latino vote. They gonna learn.
Better to start treating the 'latin' vote like the Cuban vote, the Mexican vote, the Puerto Rican vote, the Dominican vote, the South American immigrant vote, the indio vote.
(Nobody cares about the Irish vote or the Italian vote or the Polish vote anymore, because of absorption. Will the same happen with the 'latin' vote?)
Collectively, the latino vote has historically went overwhelmingly Dem, so what are you talking about?
That may change eventually, but you're going to need more data and logic than "they gon learn" if you're predicting a sea change in just one election cycle.
I'm talking about the Latino vote is not a collective in the first place. Latins are not a block. They are Balkan. Eventually, they are going to be white, just like the Irish and Italians of the 'Catholic' vote. This is what Democrats are going to learn. You're correct, I do need more data and logic than what I've presented in this thread.