Did you not see the tweet I responded too? No one is saying Amazon doesn’t need better regulation and that the employees don’t need representation.Wait, you're saying the anti-Amazon arguments are being pushed by fortunate and privileged people? Amazon is like smoking, it may provide certain short-term benefits to those employed (often not even the case, $15/hour and the benefits you get with most Amazon jobs isn't a privilege, it's the bare minimum), but long term it's giving our society cancer. And the anti-Amazon arguments from Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren and the workers trying to unionize aren't just random internet shytposting, they're well thought out critiques of monopolistic predation on our society and economy. No one is proposing nuking Amazon and leaving the employees in the dirt, they're proposing breaking the company up in accordance with the anti-monopoly laws, unionizing the workforce and closing the tax loopholes that allow them to pilfer the public coffers while putting nothing back in. Currently, working in an Amazon factor isn't a path to the middle class, as Obama previously said. The company is an impediment to the middle class, like Joe Biden said. Amazon got their employees pissing and shytting in bottles. And now Obama's former Press Secretary is Amazon's head PR guy. Small world.
A good job at a company engaged in illegal and unethical business practices that are destabilizing our democracy isn't really a good job. It's a bad job that pays well.
The Truth about Amazon and Job Creation
but to argue that Amazon is not providing gainful employment for a lot of people is ludicrous and to use what Obama said as an angle to attack his record is silly