How will Joe Biden GOVERN? General Biden Administration F**kery Thread

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
14,848
Reputation
4,393
Daps
41,731


I think the criticisms of the White House Press Corps tacitly right-wing framing of the border situation are fair (Biden did a good job bringing in stats and at least hinting at the reality of the in-country problems causing these migrations), but the amount of Biden Administration bootlicking I'm seeing in response to this press conference is disturbing and ridiculous. What did they want the reporters to do exactly, ask him "Mr. President, how did you do such a great job on COVID?" then give him a standing ovation? What are the pressing COVID questions right now? A lot of this stinks of partisan-brain Blue MAGA shyt where the press is always the enemy when they're not boosting your guy. I don't want to hear the press critiqued because they weren't sucking Biden off, I want to hear them critiqued on the hard-hitting questions of substance they didn't ask.
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
45,158
Reputation
6,799
Daps
143,973
Reppin
CookoutGang
I think the criticisms of the White House Press Corps tacitly right-wing framing of the border situation are fair (Biden did a good job bringing in stats and at least hinting at the reality of the in-country problems causing these migrations), but the amount of Biden Administration bootlicking I'm seeing in response to this press conference is disturbing and ridiculous. What did they want the reporters to do exactly, ask him "Mr. President, how did you do such a great job on COVID?" then give him a standing ovation? What are the pressing COVID questions right now? A lot of this stinks of partisan-brain Blue MAGA shyt where the press is always the enemy when they're not boosting your guy. I don't want to hear the press critiqued because they weren't sucking Biden off, I want to hear about the hard-hitting questions of substance they didn't ask.
It's his first 100 days. I imagine they could have asked him about the variety of bullet points on his first 100 day agenda plus the current events.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,259
Daps
616,256
Reppin
The Deep State
I think the criticisms of the White House Press Corps tacitly right-wing framing of the border situation are fair (Biden did a good job bringing in stats and at least hinting at the reality of the in-country problems causing these migrations), but the amount of Biden Administration bootlicking I'm seeing in response to this press conference is disturbing and ridiculous. What did they want the reporters to do exactly, ask him "Mr. President, how did you do such a great job on COVID?" then give him a standing ovation? What are the pressing COVID questions right now? A lot of this stinks of partisan-brain Blue MAGA shyt where the press is always the enemy when they're not boosting your guy. I don't want to hear the press critiqued because they weren't sucking Biden off, I want to hear them critiqued on the hard-hitting questions of substance they didn't ask.
its been 60 days.

They spent 80% of questions on illegal immigrants. A story THE MEDIA invented just to give themselves something to talk about.

Its WILD.
 

voltronblack

Superstar
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
4,392
Reputation
1,500
Daps
13,189
Reppin
NULL

The top legislative priority for congressional Democrats is foundational: they hope to rescue the nation's democracy through the "For the People Act." While bill numbers are usually trivial, in this case, Democratic leaders made this legislation H.R. 1 in the House and S. 1 in the Senate for a reason.

As regular readers know, several of the provisions of the bill relate to overhauling lobbying, ethics, campaign finance, and transparency laws, but at the heart of the For the People Act is a series of reforms to protect and expand Americans' right to vote. To that end, the legislation would, on a national scale, expand early and absentee voting. And establish a system of automatic voter registration. And modernize voting systems. And restrict voter-roll purges. And require independent commissions to draw the lines for congressional districts, weakening gerrymandering. The list keeps going, with plenty of related provisions.

The trick, of course, is figuring out how to pass it.

Earlier this month, the Democratic-led House approved the bill, largely along party lines, though this was always seen as the easier part of the process. Eight days ago, Senate Democratic leaders followed suit, unveiling the same proposal in the upper chamber, and announcing that it enjoyed the support of 49 of the conference's 50 members -- everyone except Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.).

It wasn't long before the conversation started to shift: overcoming a Republican filibuster posed an enormous hurdle, but if the For the People Act had any chance at all, it would need at least 50 votes, not 49.

Would Manchin, who backed a similar reform bill in the last Congress, really balk at his party's desperate attempt to bolster the nation's democracy? For now, the answer appears to be yes. Politico reported a short while ago:

Activists are calling on Senate Democrats to kill the filibuster to enact once-in-a-generation voting rights legislation. But Joe Manchin wants his party to step away from the edge. In a lengthy statement on Thursday, Manchin urged fellow Democrats to take a bipartisan approach rather than try and jam through a massive reform package on party lines.

"Pushing through legislation of this magnitude on a partisan basis may garner short-term benefits, but will inevitably only exacerbate the distrust that millions of Americans harbor against the U.S. government," the West Virginian wrote. He added that there are elements of the package that he supports, but concluded, "We can and we must reform our federal elections together – not as Democrats and Republicans, but as Americans to restore the faith and trust in our democracy."

Perhaps he's new here.

Manchin also apparently believes that his party is "overreaching" in the current version of the bill, and he envisions a dramatically scaled back alternative, focusing on mandatory early voting -- and little else.

By any fair measure, this is a difficult perspective to understand. The Republican Party and its allies are currently engaged in the most aggressive voter-suppression campaign in recent American history. The GOP at every level has rallied behind this as a singular cause. It is the party's "unifying mission" to make it harder for Americans to participate in their own democracy. The goal is to effectively poison the nation's political system.

Democrats have developed an antidote, which Manchin thinks has some merit, but which he's prepared to oppose unless Republicans -- the folks engaged in an anti-voting crusade -- support it, too.

It's a bit like local fire marshals seeking support from arsonists before implementing a plan to save people from fires.

The larger question, however, is what happens after GOP senators make clear to Manchin that they will not cooperate on voting rights. The West Virginian wrote, "We can and we must reform our federal elections together." OK, but when Republicans tell him they have no intention of reforming federal elections, or even working in good faith on the issue, Manchin will ... do what exactly?

It's worth emphasizing for context that Manchin also demanded bipartisan support for the recent COVID relief package, and when GOP lawmakers refused to engage, he grudgingly moved on without them. It's not inconceivable that could happen again on this and other issues.

Will Manchin reconsider his position when Republicans refuse to support any effort to bolster voting rights? A great deal is riding on the answer.
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
14,848
Reputation
4,393
Daps
41,731
It's his first 100 days. I imagine they could have asked him about the variety of bullet points on his first 100 day agenda plus the current events.
I think the filibuster is the single most important factor blocking legislative progress on the Biden Agenda, so I think it's fine for the press to keep up the pressure on that angle. Kaitlin Collins' dumbass line of questioning aside, I think this was a regular press conference, don't know why some of these people are getting their panties in a bunch because Biden is facing some non-softball questions. That being said, I would have liked to see some questions about what foreign policy lessons the Biden Administration is learning from America's history of destabilizing actions in Latin America, which is the logical conclusion of Biden's "in-country" comment, and how exactly they plan to ameliorate those problems. I would have liked to see more questions pressing on executive orders if the filibuster reform he's lukewarm on doesn't get enacted. Would have liked some questions about his healthcare prioritization. But other than that, seemed like a normal press conference, not some extraordinary disgrace. It's funny, people are claiming the Press is still in Trump-mode when it's the phalanx of Democratic/Biden booster lambasting the press who are displaying Trump brain poisoning.
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
19,902
Reputation
6,036
Daps
62,528
Reppin
San Diego
Imagine the fukkery coming from Trump's mout right now. :mjlol:

"Many people, ---excuse me---many people are saying that the boat was left there, by China, we are going to look at that, and believe me folks, rockets, very powerful, very strong rockets and weapons, we can just blast it out of there, because we are going to have oil, for cars, and for homes, and many things"
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
14,848
Reputation
4,393
Daps
41,731
its been 60 days.

They spent 80% of questions on illegal immigrants. A story THE MEDIA invented just to give themselves something to talk about.

Its WILD.
The border situation isn't a media invention, they're just (sensationally, imo) choosing to highlight it now because it plays well on TV (same reason they highlighted it under Trump) and feeds one of the hot take industrial complex (true) narratives of Democratic hypocrisy. It's a fair play story under both pre-Trump and Trump-era rules. Look, I'm all for making Noam Chomsky the managing editor for all national press outfits, but the impetus for that change isn't because Biden is getting unfair questions from a press corp unwilling to fete his wins or whatever, it's that he should be getting pressed harder but on the right line of questioning.
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
45,158
Reputation
6,799
Daps
143,973
Reppin
CookoutGang
"Many people, ---excuse me---many people are saying that the boat was left there, by China, we are going to look at that, and believe me folks, rockets, very powerful, very strong rockets and weapons, we can just blast it out of there, because we are going to have oil, for cars, and for homes, and many things"
:russ:



I just imagine him referring to tug boats or maybe one of our destroyers dragging it out. :mjlol:
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
19,902
Reputation
6,036
Daps
62,528
Reppin
San Diego
:russ:



I just imagine him referring to tug boats or maybe one of our destroyers dragging it out. :mjlol:

oh yeah

"They are powerful, big ships, I know big, and I know powerful, believe me, we will have that out of there by tomorrow morning folks, we have these things, have you heard of them? Tug boats, believe me, no one has ever used one like this in the history of the world, it's going to be beautiful, just big, beautiful boats"
 

Dillah810

Flat Girther
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
42,512
Reputation
9,607
Daps
166,193
Reppin
Flint, Michigan
This state on that "one step forward, two steps back" shyt. We get democrats into the Senate and this is how the empire strikes back.

Georgia G.O.P. Passes Major Law to Limit Voting Amid Nationwide Push
The law, which has been denounced by Democrats and voting rights groups, comes as Republican-controlled legislatures across the country mount the most extensive contraction of ballot access in generations.

Georgia Republicans on Thursday passed a sweeping law to restrict voting access in the state, introducing more rigid voter identification requirements for absentee balloting, limiting drop boxes and expanding the Legislature’s power over elections. The new measures make Georgia the first major battleground to overhaul its election system since the turmoil of last year’s presidential contest.

The legislation, which followed Democratic victories that flipped the state at the presidential and Senate levels, comes amid a national movement among Republican-controlled state legislatures to mount the most extensive contraction of voting access in generations. Seeking to appease a conservative base that remains incensed about the results of the 2020 election, Republicans have already passed a similar law in Iowa, and are moving forward with efforts to restrict voting in states including Arizona, Florida and Texas.

Democrats and voting rights groups have condemned such efforts, arguing that they unfairly target voters of color. They say the new law in Georgia particularly seeks to make voting harder for the state’s large Black population, which was crucial to President Biden’s triumph in Georgia in November and the success of Senators Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff in the January runoff elections.

Mr. Biden joined Georgia Democrats on Thursday in denouncing efforts to limit voting, calling Republicans’ push around the country “the most pernicious thing.”

“This makes Jim Crow look like Jim Eagle,” he said at his first formal news conference since taking office.

Though the law is less stringent than the initial iterations of the bill, it introduces a raft of new restrictions for voting and elections in the state, including limiting drop boxes, stripping the secretary of state of some of his authority, imposing new oversight of county election boards, restricting who can vote with provisional ballots, and making it a crime to offer food or water to voters waiting in lines. The law also requires runoff elections to be held four weeks after the original vote, instead of the current nine weeks.

The law does not include some of the harshest restrictions that had been proposed, like a ban on Sunday voting that was seen as an attempt to curtail the role of Black churches in driving turnout. And the legislation now, in fact, expands early voting options in some areas. No-excuse absentee voting, in which voters do not have to provide a rationale for casting a ballot by mail, also remains in place, though it will now entail new restrictions such as providing a state-issued identification card.




merlin_185546781_83dcd220-c504-4030-9ed7-e7c3b627711c-articleLarge.jpg

Image
merlin_185546781_83dcd220-c504-4030-9ed7-e7c3b627711c-articleLarge.jpg

State Representative Alan Powell, a Republican, spoke in favor of the voting bill on Thursday.Credit...Alyssa Pointer/Atlanta Journal-Constitution, via Associated Press
The law passed the Georgia House on Thursday morning by a party-line vote of 100 to 75, and was approved by the Senate in the evening on a 34-to-20 vote before being signed by Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican.

his own history as a secretary of state fighting for stronger voter identification laws, which Democrats have denounced as having an outsize impact on communities of color. Mr. Kemp said that protests against the bill were pure politics.

“I fought these partisan activists tooth and nail for over 10 years to keep our elections secure, accessible and fair,” Mr. Kemp said.

Georgia has quickly become fiercely contested political territory, and a focal point of the continuing clashes over voting rights. During the contentious months after the November election, the state became a particular obsession of Mr. Trump, who spun falsehoods, lies and conspiracy theories about electoral fraud and pressured election officials, including the Republican secretary of state, to “find” him votes.


SIGN UP FOR ON POLITICS WITH LISA LERER: A spotlight on the people reshaping our politics. A conversation with voters across the country. And a guiding hand through the endless news cycle, telling you what you really need to know.
Yet after election officials rebuffed Mr. Trump, and multiple audits reaffirmed the results, Republican legislators held hearings on the election, inviting some of the president’s allies like Rudolph W. Giuliani to speak. After the hearings, G.O.P. lawmakers promised to introduce new legislation to help “restore confidence” in elections, even though the last one had been held safely and securely.

Outside the Statehouse in Atlanta on Thursday, a coalition of Black faith leaders assembled a protest, voicing their opposition to the bill and calling for a boycott of major corporations in Georgia that they said had remained silent on the voting push, including Coca-Cola.

died last year. She quoted an old speech of his before voicing her opposition to the bill.

“Why do we rally, why do we protest voter suppression?” she said. “It is because our ancestors are looking down right now on this House floor, praying and believing that our fight, and that their fight, was not in vain. We call on the strength of Congressman John Lewis in this moment. Because right now, history is watching.”



merlin_185551221_21ea3c01-7020-49b6-956e-42d154668f7a-articleLarge.jpg

Image
merlin_185551221_21ea3c01-7020-49b6-956e-42d154668f7a-articleLarge.jpg

Demonstrators protesting Georgia’s bill of voting restrictions in Atlanta on Thursday.Credit...Nicole Craine for The New York Times
Other Democrats said the bill was rooted in the election falsehoods that have been spread by Mr. Trump and his allies.

“Where is the need for this bill coming from?” said Debbie Buckner, a Democratic representative from near Columbus. “From the former president who wanted the election fixed and thrown out, even when Georgia leadership told him they couldn’t do it if they wanted to.”

Representative Zulma Lopez, who represents a majority-minority district on the outskirts of Atlanta, said the bill would have an outsize impact on voters of color. In her district, she said, the number of drop boxes would be reduced to nine from 33. This was partly the result, she said, of Democrats’ being excluded from discussions.

“Close to 2.5 million Democrats voted in the general election in 2020,” Ms. Lopez said. “Yet Democrats in this House were left out of any meaningful input into the drafting of this bill.”

Democratic state senators sounded similar alarms during an afternoon debate.

“It is like a Christmas tree of goodies for voter suppression,” said State Senator Jen Jordan, a Democrat from near Atlanta. “And let’s be clear, some of the most dangerous provisions have to do with the takeover of the local elections boards.”

In a sign of the high tensions in Georgia, Mr. Kemp’s speech was abruptly cut off after about 10 minutes. A Democratic state representative, Park Cannon, had tried to attend the signing and remarks, but the doors to the governor’s office were closed.

After officers would not let her enter, Ms. Cannon lightly knocked on the door. Two officers immediately detained her, placing in her handcuffs and escorting her through the State Capitol. Neither Ms. Cannon nor the governor’s office immediately responded to requests for comment.

Alan Powell, a Republican representative from northeastern Georgia, defended the state’s bill, saying it would bring needed uniformity to an electoral system that was pushed to the brink last year.

“The Georgia election system was never made to be able to handle the volume of votes that it handled,” he said. (Multiple audits affirmed the results of Georgia’s elections last year, and there were no credible reports of any fraud or irregularities that would have affected the results.) “What we’ve done in this bill in front of you is we have cleaned up the workings, the mechanics of our election system.”

“Show me the suppression,” Mr. Powell said. “There is no suppression in this bill.”

The law is likely to be met by legal challenges from Democratic groups, and voting rights organizations have vowed to continue to work against the provisions.

Bishop Jackson said he would be working with his constituents to make sure that they had the proper identification, registered in time, and knew how to vote under the new rules.

“This is a fight,” he said. “I think we’re probably at halftime. I think we got another half to go.”

Georgia G.O.P. Passes Major Law to Limit Voting Amid Nationwide Push
 
Top