How many TDs would Mbappe score in the NFL with this footwork?

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

it's because as always u had no clue what u were discussing. DeSean was even smaller at 175. there's been a lot of effective WRs in the 5'7" 165-175 range. They could get hit and be fine. mbappe is bigger than trindon holliday too who was in the league for 5 years.

u are a clueless bum

After I tell you comparing Mbappe’s weight to NFL players who you believe are of similar stature, is meaningless, do you then go and reference players who’re smaller as if you’re proving some point your one and only brain cell believes is salient.

It doesn’t matter what size Mbappe is; he hasn’t been conditioned to handle the physicality of getting hit in football, let alone at the level of the NFL. Tyreek and Trindon are/were able to exist because they conditioned their bodies over years and years to withstand it (while fine-tuning ways to protect themselves from receiving unnecessary damage) regardless of their actual weight. I don’t know why you’re having such a hard time comprehending something as simple as this.

 

[Premeditated]

90NFL players would have an easier transition to soccer than soccer players would to playing football.

most nfl players can't run a mile under 5 minutes, imagine them trying to run for 90 minutes. football is one if the least endurance team sport after baseball with all the constant stopping. lets not even get into the footwork and the technical superiority soccer has to handegg. only ones that would make a transition if they started playing as preteens are running backs. meanwhile, soccer centerbacks, wingers and goalkeepers would have a easier time transitioning to football. to be honest, most soccer players would easily transition into nfl field goal kickers in 2 months after they retire from soccer

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

After I tell you comparing Mbappe’s weight to NFL players who you believe are of similar stature, is meaningless

i'm not addressing your "point" because u are changing what the original argument was. The argument wasn't predicated on football shape and conditioning. u and a couple other dumbasses chose to focus on height and weight only...

if u wanted the argument to be about something else then u shouldn't have blown the 1st argument.

 

[Megadeus]

most nfl players can't run a mile under 5 minutes, imagine them trying to run for 90 minutes. football is one if the least endurance team sport after baseball with all the constant stopping. lets not even get into the footwork and the technical superiority soccer has to handegg. only ones that would make a transition if they started playing as preteens are running backs. meanwhile, soccer centerbacks, wingers and goalkeepers would have a easier time transitioning to football. to be honest, most soccer players would easily transition into nfl field goal kickers in 2 months after they retire from soccer

I feel like some WRs could make good goalkeepers.

Other than that, yeah it'd be a shyt show.

Starting with natural stamina. NFL players would be sucking wind halfway into the game. And The agility and footwork required is just different. Shyt is like extreme full-contact ballet damn near. I'd be shocked if there were more than TEN players in the entire NFL who could break 5 min in the mile. Whereas every decent soccer player in the world could do that in their sleep.

And you make a point... How many times do we see soccer and rugby players hop onto a footbawl roster as kickers with ease?

 

[Bonk]

Soccer requires a different type of handle of physicality, one that is more about balance rather than actual force of impact. I don’t care for whatever dramatisation you’re trying to spam, when you know cotdamn well it pales in comparison to the brutality of football.

You told on yourself when you quickly pivoted from soccer to rugby knowing the premise of your thread fell flat on its face.

And most soccer players arent built for the NFL and would be sidelined after a few hits.

My intention wasn’t to compare the physicality between the two sports. I just created a light-hearted thread based on the footwork to see how it will look in the NFL with Mbappe’s speed as a wide receiver.

Also, as seen on this thread, there’s a misconception that football (soccer) players can’t deal with extreme physicality like the guys in pads in the NFL. And the only thing edge they have is endurance & fluidity. I think people tend to forget football (soccer) players came up playing on hard surfaces with extreme physicality & no rules. If you can survive all the kicking, hard hits & extreme circumstances involved in that - you can survive in any sport apart from perhaps boxing that involves a very high level of discipline.

Let’s not act like DeVonta Smith isn’t a stud in the NFL & Marvin Harrison isn’t a HoF receiver.

 

[Bonk]

I have and you're still full of shyt

Have you ever played rugby.

 

[BlackAchilles]

Have you ever played rugby.

Yeah couple times, great sport waiting for it to catch on more in the US

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

i'm not addressing your "point" because u are changing what the original argument was. The argument wasn't predicated on football shape and conditioning. u and a couple other dumbasses chose to focus on height and weight only...

if u wanted the argument to be about something else then u shouldn't have blown the 1st argument.

There’s only one argument and that is the premise of the thread. You’re digging that hole deeper and deeper, and you don’t even know it. It’s why the irrelevance of Mbappe’s size is lost on you. You mistakenly thought his size meant he could handle getting hit when it doesn’t work like that. You sound like someone who hasn’t played a contact sport at any point in their life.

I feel embarrassed for you, but that’s not too dissimilar to every time I see you post. You have a habit of making a fool outta yourself and not wanting to admit you’re wrong.

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

You’re digging that hole deeper and deeper, and you don’t even know it. It’s why the irrelevance of Mbappe’s size is lost on you. You mistakenly thought his size meant he could handle getting hit when it doesn’t work like that.

that's not the argument u wanted to have u said he was too small...period. if u wanted another argument then u should have started differently but u had to pivot.

clueless dumbass.. i'm not addressing your 3rd and 4th points after u blow the 1st. u already proved u don't watch football.

 

[number21]

it's because as always u had no clue what u were discussing. DeSean was even smaller at 175. there's been a lot of effective WRs in the 5'7" 165-175 range. They could get hit and be fine. mbappe is bigger than trindon holliday too who was in the league for 5 years.

u are a clueless bum

You're really bring up DeSean Jackson who has been injury prone for damn near his whole career because of his size?

You're just talking.

 

[West Coast Avenger]

Breh, I’ve been watching NFL since I was 12/13 (I support Ravens) & I have seen worse injuries playing footy in cages than I’ve seen in the NFL.

These guys play with thick helmets & pads, lol. Try playing rugby.

Get the fukk outta here!!..... .....

 

[#1 pick]

Mbappe is a generational athlete, if he came up in America, he would be a monster

 

[Biscayne]

no he's not... he's 185. he's cut.. not built. There's a difference and there's a lot of WRs that are even smaller.

Cheetah is thick(), mbappe while solid, is not on this level and he’s not built for these hits or that speed. Cheetah isn’t just “cut” he’s actually swole.

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

You're really bring up DeSean Jackson who has been injury prone for damn near his whole career because of his size?

You're just talking.

he only missed 4 games his 1st four seasons. injuries can happen to anyone of any size. he never had a career ender. he's still playing.

 

[1thouwow]

Is he mbappe on path to be the GOAT?