how could you be against socialism/communism as a black person

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
56,376
Reputation
8,326
Daps
158,196

p3pfaK4.png
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
101,442
Reputation
13,396
Daps
296,671
Reppin
NULL
Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
6,555
Reputation
728
Daps
16,451
I must make it clear, I'm not against certain forms of socialism and socialist policies done within a mixed economy. I'm also not a capitalist, however, I think certain forms and policies can be done within a mixed economy.

I am most defo opposed to True form communism. You know the one repeated ad nauseam by the white loony left and their POC pet/shills that has never been attained or 'tried', even though many regimes have tried to attain it an they have failed miserably.
 

RickyDiBiase

The Sword of Jesus of Nazareth
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
15,343
Reputation
2,192
Daps
61,780
Reppin
Cbus
I must make it clear, I'm not against certain forms of socialism and socialist policies done within a mixed economy. I'm also not a capitalist, however, I think certain forms and policies can be done within a mixed economy.

I am most defo opposed to True form communism. You know the one repeated ad nauseam by the white loony left and their POC pet/shills that has never been attained or 'tried', even though many regimes have tried to attain it an they have failed miserably.

You’re a fascist basically
 

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
27,983
Reputation
9,313
Daps
120,107
I must make it clear, I'm not against certain forms of socialism and socialist policies done within a mixed economy. I'm also not a capitalist, however, I think certain forms and policies can be done within a mixed economy.

I am most defo opposed to True form communism. You know the one repeated ad nauseam by the white loony left and their POC pet/shills that has never been attained or 'tried', even though many regimes have tried to attain it an they have failed miserably.


Aren't you in the UK?

Our "loony left" is just asking for a healt system that isn't completely controlled by corporations
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Messages
15,508
Reputation
2,136
Daps
58,239
I must make it clear, I'm not against certain forms of socialism and socialist policies done within a mixed economy. I'm also not a capitalist, however, I think certain forms and policies can be done within a mixed economy.

I am most defo opposed to True form communism. You know the one repeated ad nauseam by the white loony left and their POC pet/shills that has never been attained or 'tried', even though many regimes have tried to attain it an they have failed miserably.
You seemingly don’t know enough on the subject to make this statement but do you

Progressives are also not asking for true communism so I’m not sure where you’re getting that from except for right wing sources who say things like “loony left”

Edit: if you’re in the UK and bashing socialism that’s fukking comical :russ:

Like come the fukk on
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
56,376
Reputation
8,326
Daps
158,196

Capitalism, socialism, and the physical quality of life​


Abstract​

This study compared capitalist and socialist countries in measures of the physical quality of life (PQL), taking into account the level of economic development. The World Bank was the principal source of statistical data, which pertained to 123 countries and approximately 97 percent of the world's population. PQL variables included indicators of health, health services, demographic conditions, and nutrition (infant mortality rate, child death rate, life expectancy, crude death rate, crude birth rate, population per physician, population per nursing person, and daily per capita calorie supply); measures of education (adult literacy rate, enrollment in secondary education, and enrollment in higher education); and a composite PQL index. All PQL measures improved as economic development increased. In 30 of 36 comparisons between countries at similar levels of economic development, socialist countries showed more favorable PQL outcomes (p less than .05 by two-tailed t-test). This work with the World Bank's raw data included cross-tabulations, analysis of variance, and regression techniques, which all confirmed the same conclusions. The data indicated that the socialist countries generally have achieved better PQL outcomes than the capitalist countries at equivalent levels of economic development.



snippet:

Historically, there is some evidence that the discrepancies between capitalist and socialist nations have emerged since World War I1 and have reflected varying social policies. All the socialist countries have initiated major public health efforts. These initiatives have aimed toward improved sanitation, immunization, maternal and child care, nutrition, and housing. In every case, the socialist countries also have reorganized their health care systems, to create national health services based on the principle of universal entitlement to care. These policies have led to greater accessibility of preventive and curative services for previously deprived groups. Expanded educational Physical Quality of Life / 655 opportunity also has been a major priority of the socialist nations, as publicly subsidized education has become more widely available. Literacy campaigns in these countries have brought educational benefits to sectors of the population that earlier had not gone to school. While capitalist countries at higher levels of economic developmen1 have enjoyed similar fruits of public health and educational improvements, poorer capitalist countries seldom have succeeded in implementing such drastic changes in policy. Even in the wealthier capitalist countries, public health and educational policies have not achieved equitable access for low-income groups, racial minorities, and geographically isolated communities (21, 22).

Profound differences in PQL between the capitalist and socialist systems have arisen in the less developed countries. There, the options in public health and education that a socialist political-economic system provides seem to overcome some of the grueling deprivations of poverty. Many of the recent postrevolutionary societies (which we treated as a separate category in the data analysis) have adopted socialist systems. Predictably, these countries may witness improvements in PQL during the next decade that will differentiate them from other countries at their level of economic developmen t. Whether they do will be an important question to study in subsequent research.

Meanwhile, the relationships between PQL and political-economic system deserve more serious attention than they have received in the past. Our findings indicate that countries with socialist political-economic systems can make great strides toward meeling basic human needs, even without extensive economic resources. When much of the world’s population suffers from disease, early death, malnutrition, and illiteracy, these observations take on a meaning that goes beyond cold statistics.
 

Carl Tethers

@mastermind is OVO
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
9,566
Reputation
5,475
Daps
41,619
You seemingly don’t know enough on the subject to make this statement but do you

Progressives are also not asking for true communism so I’m not sure where you’re getting that from except for right wing sources who say things like “loony left”

Edit: if you’re in the UK and bashing socialism that’s fukking comical :russ:

Like come the fukk on

Man is clearly a Brit Tory. Expect him to look like

640px-Kwasi_Kwarteng_Official_Cabinet_Portrait%2C_September_2022_%28cropped%29.jpg
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
29,277
Reputation
4,909
Daps
46,463
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
Another one :snoop:


OP, you're from the UK right?

yeah :ehh: the country that created the USA and wrote your constitution for you :ufdup:


"Of the signers of the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, and U.S. Constitution, nearly all were native born and of British heritage, including Scots, Irish, and Welsh."


  • George Washington
  • John Adams
  • Thomas Jefferson
  • James Madison
  • Benjamin Franklin
  • Alexander Hamilton
These founders had the most power and influence. Their future decisions would affect generations of unborn Americans.

Their origins are listed below:
  • George Washington
    • His dad- Augustine Washington- attended school in England
  • John Adams
    • Puritan background
      • Most Puritans came over in the 16th and 17th centuries as English Protestants
  • Thomas Jefferson
    • Family Origins in Wales
  • James Madison
    • Earliest Madison family predecessor-Captain Isaac Madison born in London, England 1590
  • Benjamin Franklin
    • Josiah Franklin (Ben Franklin’s father)- born directly in England
    • Ben Franklin spent a great deal of time as a diplomat in London
  • Alexander Hamilton
    • James Hamilton (Alexander Hamilton’s father)- a Scottish tradesman
vHCq43O.png
 
Top