One has to understand the Puritan philosophy that the white man subscribes to. Work hard, toil, suffer, pray to God and suffer for a long time and you will be rewarded. This is the first major American philosophy. The second is rugged independence. Pull one's self up by the bootstraps no matter the circumstance. Mind your own business and don't bother others. You do those things and you gain their admiration. You can't be passive to do either. If you're the violent radical, you can certainly do the first. This is why you see some American kids join the Taliban or Isis. That's in the DNA of Americans, because it is subliminally fed to us over and over. The second is where the violent radical can't win. So, IMO, it comes down to how those in power looking down on you, judge you to be. Those southern governors in the 50s and 60s saw the Civil Rights movement as a bunch of agitators. Rocking the boat. Bothering others. Not to mention blacks and a lot of northerners. This is the problem a lot of people are having with movements today. They think of them as agitators. Rocking the boat in society. The Fed saw them as following that Puritan ethic and realized that it was the government that was keeping them from living the second philosophy. The Christian aspect plays to the Puritan ethic. None of this is 'passive'. It just purposely plays into what those in power want to see. By rewarding that behavior we end up demonizing any other way of doing things, and we end up associated monetary success with hard work.