Note that
@Tommy Knocks has three times failed to respond to the scientific paper titled, "Race is not an objective genomic classification"
Note that
@Tommy Knocks continues to try to advocate for categories of "pure black", "black with white admixture", "mixed", and "white with black admixture", and claims they're rooted in science, but ignores the 8,000 genetic scientists that say such categories are "scientifically meaningless."
By your definition of Black an African immigrant would get reparations and the ADOS Hodge twins wouldn't, so there goes that argument.
Of course, if reparations is made specifically for slavery, then it will be restricted to ADOS ancestry and your desire to define "Black" won't be a factor. The details will have to be worked out of course, but whatever they are, if it's decided on slavery then the Hodge twins had more ADOS ancestry than you do, so your definition of Blackness ain't the criteria.
If reparations is more generally reparations for the discrimination of the Black experience, not just slavery but segregation, redlining, discrimination, and all that shyt, then the Hodge twins are descendants of that legacy too. The majority of their ancestors would have faced that.