HEY...lets ruin our favorite tv show/movie with common logic *THE SEQUEL*

jackswstd

Retired
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
72,971
Reputation
8,917
Daps
265,073
Reppin
Chicago
I'm rewatching New Jack City right now... what I never understood after the failed drug deal and Nino killing G-Money why the hell did he go back to the Carter in his apartment? :wtf: Your entire drug empire has come to a stand still, your entire crew is dead and you got all of New York's cops and mafia on your ass why didn't you leave the state when you had the chance? :damn:You should have left and lay low for a while and made a new plan or at least start another Carter in another state
He wasn't at the Carter when Scotty and Peretti found him.
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,295
Reputation
6,840
Daps
90,774
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
I'm rewatching New Jack City right now... what I never understood after the failed drug deal and Nino killing G-Money why the hell did he go back to the Carter in his apartment? :wtf: Your entire drug empire has come to a stand still, your entire crew is dead and you got all of New York's cops and mafia on your ass why didn't you leave the state when you had the chance? :damn:You should have left and lay low for a while and made a new plan or at least start another Carter in another state

bruh at that point it was over...there is no laying low/starting another Carter
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2015
Messages
590
Reputation
80
Daps
1,733
I wonder how that would work in the real world would she be given credit for time served...I cant see a jury sending her to prison twice for the same murder :jbhmm:
That's the thing, it's not the same murder. Let's say someone beats or rapes someone else gets convicted and gets out and does the same thing to that same person. Under the law, it's a different crime altogether.

In the case of the movie, the false murder charge will be removed however, the actual murder will go to court. Now if the jury or the judge decides to go soft, that's another story.
 

NotAnFBIagent

[redacted]
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
32,967
Reputation
5,346
Daps
144,675
That's the thing, it's not the same murder. Let's say someone beats or rapes someone else gets convicted and gets out and does the same thing to that same person. Under the law, it's a different crime altogether.

In the case of the movie, the false murder charge will be removed however, the actual murder will go to court. Now if the jury or the judge decides to go soft, that's another story.
Yeah its legally a different crime but the defense would be easy since its impossible to legally murder the same person twice and shes already did time...would be interesting to see how it plays out
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2015
Messages
590
Reputation
80
Daps
1,733
Yeah its legally a different crime but the defense would be easy since its impossible to legally murder the same person twice and shes already did time...would be interesting to see how it plays out
It would be interesting
 

Whitty Hutton

these posters are TRASH
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
4,005
Reputation
646
Daps
9,811
Reppin
retired
Back to the Future II

When Biff was caught outside the school building with the Oh La La book covered with the Almanac sleeve and Strickland confiscated it, Marty should've been smart enough to know that wasn't the real Almanac. There's NO way Biff would've let Strickland take that without breaking his fukking jaw, knowing it had the potential to make him billions :dry:

:rip: Strickland if he took the real one
How did Biff even know how to operate the time machine in the first place/
And when he gave his young self the Almanac, why didn't 2015 change to alternate 2015 while Marty and Doc were there?:ohhh:
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
35,780
Reputation
7,817
Daps
99,146
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
That's the thing, it's not the same murder. Let's say someone beats or rapes someone else gets convicted and gets out and does the same thing to that same person. Under the law, it's a different crime altogether.

In the case of the movie, the false murder charge will be removed however, the actual murder will go to court. Now if the jury or the judge decides to go soft, that's another story.

Yeah its legally a different crime but the defense would be easy since its impossible to legally murder the same person twice and shes already did time...would be interesting to see how it plays out


shyt would be shot down in 5 seconds










Thus goes the premise of Double Jeopardy, last weekend's top grossing movie starring Ashley Judd as Libby and Tommy Lee Jones as her parole officer. Following a series of chaotic scenes, Libby finally finds Nick and threatens, while pointing a gun at him, "I could shoot you, and they can't touch me." Because of the defense of double jeopardy, Libby declares, she cannot be convicted twice for killing Nick. Her parole officer, a former law professor, confirms this legal analysis. But a false interpretation it is. An examination of the Fifth Amendment will explain why.

Prosecutors must plead their cases in very specific terms. They must note the time, place and method of a particular crime. This is done for two reasons. First, the Fifth Amendment protects the defendant from being prosecuted again for the same crime. This is known as "double jeopardy."

The second reason is to protect the prosecutor. For example, imagine a prosecutor bringing a person into court for burglary. If that same person had been tried for burglary last week, he might claim that the law against double jeopardy protects him from being tried in this second instance. However, if the prosecutor shows that last week's burglary took place in Virginia on a Tuesday night and this week's burglary took place in Maryland on a Wednesday night, the prosecutor can prove that double jeopardy doesn't apply--the defendant is being tried for different burglaries.

How does this apply to the movie Double Jeopardy? When Libby was tried for murdering her husband the first time, the prosecutor stated a specific time and place for the crime. If she had actually killed her husband later in the movie, it would've been in a different city and time, making it a different crime. Therefore, double jeopardy would not apply, and she would be accused of murder. Thus, David Weisberg and Douglas S. Cook, writers of Double Jeopardy, not only penned a mediocre screenplay but would flunk a first-year law exam as well.

Libby's true remedy would be to bring proof to the proper authorities that her husband is still alive. The court would then nullify her original conviction and bring charges against her husband.


British playwright Oscar Wilde once said that life imitates art far more than art imitates life. Anyone who believes it is possible to commit a crime and claim the defense of double jeopardy will be sadly mistaken. In this case, imitating art could put you on death row.
 

nieman

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
17,550
Reputation
2,415
Daps
34,691
Reppin
Philly
Double Jeopardy

She can be charged with the killing of the husband. It's like saying you can rob a bank and go to prison. Get out and rob the same bank and not get convicted. When they say you can't get convicted of the same crime, they mean the crime that took place on a certain time, date and day.

This had to be the worst offense. They created an entire movie around a theory would've easily been proven false by something called research.
 

nieman

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
17,550
Reputation
2,415
Daps
34,691
Reppin
Philly
Yeah its legally a different crime but the defense would be easy since its impossible to legally murder the same person twice and shes already did time...would be interesting to see how it plays out
It would be interesting

That would've been a better movie. They done misled folks. When the movie came out, I quickly pointed it out that it wasn't Double Jeopardy to some of my peers. They gave me the :usure::comeon:.

Then again, Ashley Judd got that info from a fellow inmate that obviously didn't really visit the law library...not for researching at least. Maybe she was down there servicing CO's
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2015
Messages
590
Reputation
80
Daps
1,733
That would've been a better movie. They done misled folks. When the movie came out, I quickly pointed it out that it wasn't Double Jeopardy to some of my peers. They gave me the :usure::comeon:.

Then again, Ashley Judd got that info from a fellow inmate that obviously didn't really visit the law library...not for researching at least. Maybe she was down there servicing CO's
I got that from folks as well when I tried to tell them.
 

ThaGlow

All Star
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
4,148
Reputation
120
Daps
6,800
INGLORIOUS BASTERDS
Why didn't Van Hammersmark just meet up with the Basterds... where the Basterds were instead. Seems easier for her to go kinda incognito and meet them there, rather than for three of the Basterds to dress up and pretend to be German soldiers. :martin:
 
Top