Hmmm very interesting opinion piece. Im studying so I havent been on but I wanted to log in and speak on this. Im in academic mode so I'll formulate my argument as such:
I dont have a twitter so this is relatively all new to me. I didnt know their thoughts were this short sighted, broad and radical. In my opinion, these women thrive off of emotion. Quite a few fallacies within their arguments and I'll explain them:
Fallacy of Non-Testable Hypothesis:
Can the hypothesis that black men are worse than white men or the largest oppressors of Black women be proved? No, simply put. The same white men that have more control and influence than we do, could practice covert racism. Basically, not hire a woman with the name "Kiesha" or "Imani", so in that way white men are impeding the financial security and stability of her lifestyle, and yet a black men is somehow more oppressive by using hurtful words. Im not buying this. Its not testable nor is it a sound hypothesis
Fallacy of generalization:
This is a fairly obvious one. "Black men in general are this!", "Black men in general do and believe this!" What this does is further alienate the black men that may support you but not necessarily agree with all of your views. This creates a bigger problem another poster alluded to. Here soon I could see a black version of the "Red pill" or MGTOW movement.
Fallacy of Cherry-Picking:
Another fairly obvious one. Cherry picking certain black men that may perfrom malicious actions or things with ill intent, and then labeling all black men as oppressors or whatever the hell words they want to use. This goes hand in hand with the previous fallacy
Fallacy of Band Wagon:
This fallacy states:
The basic fallacy of democracy: that popular ideas are necessarily right.
This fallacy is the major flaw of group think. Its seems as if the group think of these black feminists think black men are the main creator of their problems. Foolish and very short sighted, and quite frankly I dont feel the need to explain this one its so lucid and half baked
Fallacy of Begging the Question:
This is the fallacy of basically repeating the conclusion over and over and implying it to be true, all without providing sufficient evidence! "Black men are the white men of the black community! Why? Its obvious, cant you see it!" And yet fail to explain it. They beg the question in the form of half baked tweets and then reaffirm their truth by the amount of retweets, likes etc. their said tweet may receive. Begging the question.
Fallacy of Dogmatism:
The unwillingness to even consider the opponent’s argument.
Another fairly obvious one. Several examples of this in the OP, and a fairly perspicuous argument to understand. These black feminist want black men to shut up and agree with them and basically become yes-men to their argument. When challenged they often beg the question or appeal to emotion. A great segue to the next fallacy I may add
Fallacy of appeal to emotion:
These radical black feminists that purport their argument use this as the basis of their argument it seems. "You make us feel x, y, z and therefore it is." No need to build an actual argument and use anecdotes and examples. Just feed off your emotions in the now.
So thats a few fallacies in their inductive argument. An inductive argument is one where the conclusions are strong enough and credible enough to support a conclusion, then that said conclusion must be true. Fallacies undermine and invalidate the truth and credibility of ones premises. And in logic there is no such argument where the conclusion is true and the premises are false. Therefore their argument (radical black feminists) is looking very unsound and lacking credibility
Like I said Im not on twitter nor do I have time to argue with these women, but if someone wants to actually academically challenge these women and their group think then go ahead. Should be interesting
The Most Common Logical Fallacies
Validity and Soundness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy