Google Chrome’s plan to limit ad blocking extensions kicks off next week

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
46,417
Reputation
7,533
Daps
138,278

Google's Manifest V3 will make the fight against third-party adblockers even worse​

Opinion

By Allisa James

published June 20, 2024

Manifest V3 makes it all clear

 In this photo illustration, a silhouetted woman holds a smartphone with the Google Chrome logo displayed on the screen.

(Image credit: Photo Illustration by Rafael Henrique/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

After years of delays, Google is finally rolling out its Manifest V3 Chrome browser extension framework, encouraging extension developers to make the switch as it begins to drop support for Manifest V2 on Chrome Beta, Dev, and Canary channels.

Google has even been sending emails to users informing them when an extension is no longer supported and has been turned off, according to X (formerly known as Twitter) user Leopeva64.

One of the biggest concerns surrounding this move has been breaking adblockers that rely on V2’s framework, as V3 is far more restrictive. For instance, uBlock Origin needs around 300,000 rules to work properly, which far exceeds V3’s hard limit of 30,000 — and the former’s number doesn’t even include custom rules.

Chrome also removed the blocking version of webRequest API and replaced it with declarativeNetRequest API in V3. Unlike V2, this gives the browser the final say on modifying requests instead of the adblock extensions, making said extensions much less effective at blocking ads and tracking requests.

Users and privacy advocates have been sounding the alarm on the potential ripple effect this will have on online privacy and security. However, one could argue that since V3 is still a work in progress, many of these issues can be worked out in the future by both Google and third-party developers (though they will exist in the current version).

What is Google’s incentive for aiding adblockers’ functionality with Manifest V3?​

While I wholeheartedly believe that the developers will create workarounds for these issues, it will instead be impeded by Google every step of the way. You only have to look at how the tech giant has been escalating its tactics against adblock extensions being used on Chrome browser for YouTube.

Recently, users have reported that YouTube videos will auto-skip to the end if they have an adblock extension enabled in their browser, as well as video buffering issues and error messages that claim content isn’t available on the app. There’s even a new tactic reportedly being tested called server-side ad injection, in which websites directly integrate advertisements into video content on the server. Not only does this bypass adblock on Chrome browsers, but it even seems to work on Mozilla users with the uBlock extension. Thankfully, developers like Sponsorblock — which broke the news on SSAI in the first place — are already working on workarounds.

In other words, Google is using Manifest V3 to continue its crusade against third-party adblockers, in conjunction with all these other tactics and tools that it’s currently testing out on YouTube. If developers want to stay ahead of the curve and continue to run functioning extensions, they will have to accept the fact that Google will fight them on this tooth and nail.

For now, if users are concerned about their privacy and safety, it’s time to make the switch to Mozilla Firefox. It’s one of the few browsers that doesn’t run on Chromium and offers a host of extensions that protect your internet privacy on every level. It also recently announced that it wouldn’t be deprecating Manifest V2 support as it continues to build on previous MV3 Chrome compatibility in new updates.

In other words: do what you should have done years ago and switch to Firefox if you’re truly concerned about Chrome’s upcoming privacy troubles. It’s clear that despite what Google attempts to do with adblockers, Mozilla is committed to providing developers with the tools it needs to fight back.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
46,417
Reputation
7,533
Daps
138,278
Edge is based on Chromium :francis:

too many people don't know how essential google chromium has been to the development of browsers. when microsoft killed of trident and opera killed off presto, we basically only have 3 major browsing engines left, blink webkit and gecko. a lotf of major companies will happily let google take the backlash as they choose not to support V2 in future browser versions. I don't think Samsung has said anything about supporting V2 either after it's been phased out from chromium. these companies really don't want users controlling their own computing experience.
 

TheFryingDutchman

Grenada Bound
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
10,163
Reputation
579
Daps
28,489
I actually just got a new phone that I'm about to boot up tonight. I was gonna go back to Firefox, but everyone showing love to Brave got a breh intrigued :ohhh:

Perfect time to make the switch:blessed:
 

AStrangeName

Griffith did nothing wrong
Joined
Jan 18, 2016
Messages
7,472
Reputation
1,270
Daps
18,185
too many people don't know how essential google chromium has been to the development of browsers. when microsoft killed of trident and opera killed off presto, we basically only have 3 major browsing engines left, blink webkit and gecko. a lotf of major companies will happily let google take the backlash as they choose not to support V2 in future browser versions. I don't think Samsung has said anything about supporting V2 either after it's been phased out from chromium. these companies really don't want users controlling their own computing experience.
I still think Microsoft killing off EdgeHTML was dumb and conceding to chromium only gave Google more pull than people realize. To think that Brave almost went with Gecko, but chose chromium instead. I think Vivaldi should've made a presto successor, instead of choosing chromium.
 

Mike Nasty

Superstar
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
11,560
Reputation
2,020
Daps
56,568
I actually just got a new phone that I'm about to boot up tonight. I was gonna go back to Firefox, but everyone showing love to Brave got a breh intrigued :ohhh:

Perfect time to make the switch:blessed:
Brave is better than Firefox.
Go to Settings>Media>Allow Background Play and thank me later.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
46,417
Reputation
7,533
Daps
138,278
I still think Microsoft killing off EdgeHTML was dumb and conceding to chromium only gave Google more pull than people realize. To think that Brave almost went with Gecko, but chose chromium instead. I think Vivaldi should've made a presto successor, instead of choosing chromium.


microsoft made major dumb moves in the past 20 years.. they could have had soapbox their youtube competitor to train ai content on etc. they could have had windows phone but they killed that too. what they did to nokia is a travesty and regulators should have never allowed that acquisition to go through.

it seems like developing a browser rendering engine is much more herculean task than what it was 20 years ago and if they're choosing not to invest in it than it's no surprise why some companies aren't doing it either since theres no really money in re-engineering it.
 

Mike Nasty

Superstar
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
11,560
Reputation
2,020
Daps
56,568
:what:

no extension or userscript support, maybe it's the best for people who don't know any better. :mjlol:



Maybe in my next life I'll care about userscript support. That reddit post explaining how to do it on Firefox is exactly why it isn't better, and that shyt only worked half the time.
 
Top