Glorilla just sold her soul to the Devil. She got next!!

pawdalaw

Superstar
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
8,215
Reputation
1,936
Daps
26,913
Reppin
Fayetteville
Thank you for posting these, the important thing for me is having an open mind and seeking the truth.
It still troubles me that

the children were able to give such detailed accounts. Finishing each other's sentences even. 2 adults together wouldn't do as good a job.

The father is very wealthy and powerful, so essentially we're expecting him to be held accountable by a judge in his peer group.

Most of those churches (particularly in the UK) have very dark histories.

Shyt like this didn't draw immediate retaliation from those present.

Most large children/satanic scandals are swept under the rug... Epstein.
Here's 2 hrs. Of them. Do you know of any kids that can stay on script for that long?



I'd love to believe this isn't true, but there is too much collateral damage. The kids still are not right after all these years. And there are too many reports of this type of thing happening, when we know what goes on in their churches.

Here's the detective who did the interview
 
Last edited:

Animal House

Superstar
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
16,718
Reputation
2,443
Daps
39,214
Reppin
NULL
Breh got no detail “it’s some illuminate shyt” no nikka they took 400 photos for hours and they are gaming you chump. Next week you still going to let all the femaleS in your life sing about twin n’ em and how they b-hole brown. GTFO

For you information Glorilla is actually no other than....

Swae Lee!


Jenkees! :lupe:
giphy.gif
Have a good morning coli I’m out I almost died reading this post:dead:
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
21,756
Reputation
7,346
Daps
92,152
Reppin
Chase U
Sure, you can say the most important thing should be to have an open mind, but not so open that your brain starts leaking out. They gave detailed accounts, because they were harshly coached through psychological and emotional pressure by the mother and her new partner to gain an advantage in family court. People lying about their former spouse to get custody or support is not uncommon. And that's what makes the most sense here, not some satanic pedophile conspiracy. Besides, the kids changed their story admitting that it wasn't true, and that they were being forced to say this by the mother and her new partner.

The father wasn't wealthy or powerful, either. That was her first husband. They didn't have kids. She had them with her second husband who was just an actor. People who build these conspiracies always make the claim about wealth and power, because they think it strengthens the belief that they only get away with it, because they're rich and connected to the ring leaders.

You don't know what the kids are like today. And the so-called collateral damage has been proven to be non-existent, because there were no victims. The only damage caused was to the people being accused of being part of a satanic pedophile ring and the children being forced to lie through violence and manipulation. Ray Savage isn't the one who interviewed the children, either. He entered the scene after the fact. And only claimed to talk to the mother for 3 hours, but that's been debunked too, because the mother was out of the picture at that point (on the run). He's a nutcase himself who likely wasn't even a police officer.


Ella’s story starts in the 1990s, when the Russian-born art-history-graduate-turned-yoga teacher got married to a wealthy English banker and moved to Hampstead.

After they split up a few years later Ella started a relationship with an actor called David*, and they had two children.

Yet by 2014 they were locked in an ugly custody battle, with allegations of violence on both sides.

Ella started dating a new man, Abraham Christie.

Abraham, now 66, believed hemp, the herb from which cannabis is derived, to be the giver of life.

He made Ella’s children drink hemp smoothies and asked them to call him “Papa-hemp”.

In July 2014, the family went on holiday to Morocco.

Ella and Abraham claim it was there that the children — then both under ten — told them about being abused by their father David, by teachers at their school and by fellow parents.

When they returned to London, the children repeated the allegations to police.

I’ve seen a video of their interviews, where they describe how the cult carried out horrors including baby sacrifice in the local church.

The police searched the church but, perhaps unsurprisingly, could not find a shred of evidence.

In mid-September, the police interviewed the children again — and this time they changed their story.

They told police the truth, that they had been pressured into lying by Ella and Abraham, that Abraham had kicked them, hit them on the head with a metal spoon and poured water over their heads so they couldn’t breathe until they said exactly what he wanted.

The police closed the investigation.

But, extraordinarily, they did not bring in Abraham for questioning, let alone arrest him on suspicion of child abuse.

The case then moved to the family courts, where a judge had to decide who would have custody of Ella and David’s children.

Ella chose to represent herself, meaning she got access to all the evidence, including videos of her kids being interviewed by the police and other sensitive material such as their medical reports.

At this point, Ella sought the help of Sabine McNeill, an informal legal adviser known as a McKenzie friend — a person who attends a trial as a non-professional helper or adviser to a litigant who does not have legal representation in court.

 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
21,756
Reputation
7,346
Daps
92,152
Reppin
Chase U
Sabine McNeill? Well...


Over the course of three years, Ms McNeill, 73, targeted online four people who had been falsely accused of being involved in a satanic paedophilic cult, promulgating those untrue accusations and causing the victims and their families to suffer death threats, to have to move house and to change their children’s schooling amongst other serious consequences.

Ms McNeill was convicted on 14 December 2018 after a trial at Southwark Crown Court. On 10 January 2019, she was sentenced by HHJ Cahill QC to imprisonment for eight years for the stalking offences, and a further year (to be served consecutively) for breaching the restraining order. The sentence for the stalking offences is believed to be the highest passed for that offence since the maximum sentence was increased to 10 years in 2017.



Mr Savage had been consigned to the dustbin of history, or so we thought; but in a recent email, noted dowsing and crystal-planting specialist Penny Pullen referred to him as a credible source.

“Oh, right!” we thought. “Whatever happened to him, anyway?”

You might recall that Mr Savage first turned up at the demonstrations at Christ Church Hampstead in late March 2015, where he famously declared that he had spent three hours sitting with Ella Draper, and that due to his “20 years of experience” as a Detective Sergeant with Sussex police, he could affirm with “110% confidence” that she was telling the truth.

He didn’t explain how he’d managed to spend three hours with a woman who wasn’t actually in the UK; and oddly, Ella has never mentioned this conversation. That’s a strange oversight, considering that if Mr Savage really had been a police officer, he could have been a valuable character witness for Ella.

But never mind. Probably just slipped her mind. She was very busy at the time—police to evade, Abe to placate, children to ignore, hoaxes to perpetrate. You know how it is.

Also, as commenter Spiny Norman said, “What exactly was Ella supposedly telling the truth about? Pssst—Ray, mate—Ella wasn’t the victim. The children were. She never claimed to have witnessed the ritual abuse you say she was telling the truth about.”

So there’s that. But even stranger than the fact that Ella didn’t drag Mr Savage into her case is that following the church demonstrations, he just quietly slipped away, and has not been heard from since.

So what happened? Why did the Hoaxtead pushers not hang onto this superficially sane-sounding man as though he were the last life-boat on the Titanic? After all, it’s not as though this crew has a surplus of normal-looking, well-spoken people who don’t froth at the mouth. Mr Savage, it seems to us, ought to have been a critical asset. And yet he is not.

We know that the Hoaxtead mob aren’t usually terribly picky about who they’ll accept as a friend—a quick scan down their roster of supporters reveals a motley crew of scammers, fraud artists, wannabes, and the genuinely mentally ill, who egg one another on in promoting the hoax.

It’s interesting that Mr Savage, who started off as such a promising player, especially by comparison with some of the rank and file, seems to have completely dropped off the roster. It’s really impossible to say at this stage whether he jumped or was pushed.

What do we know?​

Some of our commenters kicked the subject of Mr Savage’s bona fides around a couple of days ago. In addition to his dowsing activities and his involvement with MMS (the so-called medical miracle which consists of ingesting a chemical very similar to pure bleach as a cure-all), Mr Savage seems to have been involved in various fringe political movements.

It was suggested by several people that Mr Savage had never been a police officer at all. One commenter noted that Mr Savage had been quoted as a “former police officer” in a Daily Mail article, but another pointed out that this didn’t constitute verification: newspapers will generally take a minor interviewee at their word.

A couple of commenters suggested that Mr Savage might in fact be an actor, playing the role of ‘experienced ex-police officer’ for the cameras. Joe Kerr said, “What would be interesting is if a photo could be found with a ‘collar number’—the division number on the shoulder flash most Policemen wear. OR even one of him next to or in a Police car….. Ideally one we can see the number plate of”.

Issues of discrepancies in his uniform were discussed, along with the fact that none of us has ever been able to dig up any conclusive evidence in one direction or the other.

As we all know, not everything is available online, tempting though it might be to think so. Still, certain facts which Mr Savage has stated about himself just don’t add up.

Another imaginary police officer?​

Neelu Berry likes to bang on about non-existent and lying police officers.Perhaps she might like to take a closer look at Mr Savage, who seems a bit fuzzy on the details of his law enforcement career:

Here are some interesting numbers to consider:

  • In Mr Savage’s 2014 interview with Sean Maguire, he states that he is 65 years old.
  • This puts his year of birth at 1949.
  • At the Hampstead church protest, he states that he had a 20-year career as a police officer.
  • But in the Maguire interview he states that he left the police force in 1983.
  • This means he must have joined up in 1963.
  • Mr Savage was 14 years old in 1963.
So…unless the age requirements for police officers were extremely relaxed in the early 1960s, or Mr Savage has the world’s worst memory about important dates such as “when I retired” and “how old I am”, we’re left to conclude that he is not quite what he seems.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
21,756
Reputation
7,346
Daps
92,152
Reppin
Chase U
Shyt like this didn't draw immediate retaliation from those present.
1) Get off tiktok and youtube. That shyt rots your brain.
2) What is this video supposed to prove?
3) The original video is 43 seconds long and show the father wrestling the baby away from the priest. Your video is 28 seconds. It was cut short on purpose.




In a 40-second clip posted online, which has since went viral, the clergyman lashes out during the ceremony because the boy would not stop crying.

However, he swiftly became annoyed that the boy will not stop crying and grabbed him by the face, and said sternly: “Stop crying, calm down. Calm down.”

He then unleashes a hard slap against the baby’s cheek, provoking a chorus of gasps among those sat in the church.

A man thought to be the child’s father is seen attempting to take him away – only for the priest to grip the boy by his neck.

Those gathered in the church can be heard to tell the cleric: “Don’t hit the child,” and: “Sir, we do not hit him,” but he is seemingly unapologetic.

“You have to calm down, you have to calm down. There you go,” the priest tells the child as the parents of the infant appear increasingly agitated.

The mother pleads with the priest to let go, but he continues to grip the boy by the head.

The father is then able to wrestle the baby away and into his arms, as another woman attending the service also intervenes in a bid to ease tensions when the video cuts out.
 

pawdalaw

Superstar
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
8,215
Reputation
1,936
Daps
26,913
Reppin
Fayetteville

pawdalaw

Superstar
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
8,215
Reputation
1,936
Daps
26,913
Reppin
Fayetteville
1) Get off tiktok and youtube. That shyt rots your brain.
2) What is this video supposed to prove?
3) The original video is 43 seconds long and show the father wrestling the baby away from the priest. Your video is 28 seconds. It was cut short on purpose.




I don't necessarily care what happened before or after. It shows the father snatching the baby in the clip I posted. The fact that the priestess comfortable enough to do that was my main point. If someone (priest included did that to your child in front of you) what would your reaction be?
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
21,756
Reputation
7,346
Daps
92,152
Reppin
Chase U
Thanks again for sharing that! Just a couple of questions:

Do you believe satanic rituals involving children happen within the church?

Why would the mother continued to "stalk and harass" people involved 4yrs. After if it was a hoax?

What personal gain could come about from pretending to be a police officer investigating the case?
No.

Because she is a nutcase.

Because he is a gullible nutcase that wants attention as his history shows. Same with Sabine McNeill.

I don't necessarily care what happened before or after. It shows the father snatching the baby in the clip I posted. The fact that the priestess comfortable enough to do that was my main point. If someone (priest included did that to your child in front of you) what would your reaction be?
The same thing the father did. Take my kid away from him. The priest being bold enough to do that means nothing. It definitely doesn't give credibility to the claims of satanic pedophile cults.
 

Richard Glidewell

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
5,629
Reputation
1,247
Daps
14,873
These topics always show successful, supposed to be successful people that use a popular pose, but what about the greater magnitude of people you never heard of and never will that do the same pose?
 
Top