reservoirdogs
Superstar
I always regarded Trout higher than LemieuxThey both have average resumes to me.
Both of their best wins are arguably robberies (Lara & Jacobs), which leads to the best clear win for them is Austin Trout & David Lemieux...not exactly the toughest opposition
This fight is going to officially stamp one or the other as better...as long as there's no controversies
Actually think Canelo's win over Cotto is also better than beating Lemieux. I'd probably pick Cotto to outbox and beat Lemieux even now.
Lara and Jacobs were not arguable robberies imo just close fights which could go either way although I had Canelo clearly as the winner on a close fight.
I'd say the Lara win is more impressive cause that fight was close on paper, the odds weren't as far from each other whereas Jacobs was a huge underdog who was supposed to have a glass chin and etc... the narrative on Jacobs changed drastically after the Golovkin fight. Before the fight he was a "glass chinned bum who's gonna get steamrolled" after the fight he became an "elite mw who was significantly bigger than Golovkin and he'd beat Canelo too."
Jacobs really proved that he's better than many thought but Lara was regarded high even before the Canelo fight.
Add that Lara was/is pretty much the nightmare matchup for Canelo which makes that win even more impressive to me.