Who did Stevens beat when he was on that 'run?'
At least Angulo had just come from nearly knocking Lara out. At least Khan didn't jump from WW to 160 like Brook did. Canelo was only 20 and 22 when he fought 'shopworn' Baldomir and Mosley. Clearly they weren't in their prime, but isn't that the way an up and comer is supposed to be brought up? Y'all discredit Trout but everyone was saying Canelo wouldn't face him, as was the same story with Lara, Mayweather, and now, Golvkin.
Stevens beat Elvin Ayala by KO, Derrick Finley by UD, and Saul Roman by KO. Most of these fights were on NBC sports back when Duva was running shows on that network. That's not great by a long shot, but dude did that in one year before getting a shot at GGG. nikkas ain't fighting 4x a year like that anymore. That's a decent lil run for a C level boxer. You gotta put that into perspective.
Whereas
Angulo who was always touted as a better fighter than Stevens, gets destroyed by Kirkland who is the underdog. Angulo then beats a prospect in Raul Casarez, then goes life and death with another prospect in Jorge Silva where he could have lost. He gets the Lara fight and looks decent scoring 2 knockdowns,but he still gets stopped.
Stevens was way more impressive on his way to a GGG fight than Angulo was leading up to Canelo. Most knew Angulo was shot going into the Canelo fight. Nobody was saying Stevens was shot while on his way to GGG.
Khan may rank higher than Brook all time, but Brook was looked at as the better more fresher fighter of the two when they fought Canelo and Golovkin. This the same Khan that needed a gift to beat Chris Algieri.
I didn't discredit Trout. Its a good solid win for Canelo, but it was still a close competitive fight where some thought it could have gone either way. Canelo still gets props because nikkas aint think he was ready for that type of bout. but.......
The thing is you don't get credit for just facing guys nikkas thought you would duck, You gotta be impressive against them too. What's the point of fighting a bunch of top names but never dominating any and always winning by split or majority decision.