If you are you gotta get your money all the way up (mandatory anyway) and follow dudes like Patrice or Biggie.If u an ugly nikka thats all u will ever be
But if you’re regular pockets, regular game and not #handsomegang times is gonna be tough.
If you are you gotta get your money all the way up (mandatory anyway) and follow dudes like Patrice or Biggie.If u an ugly nikka thats all u will ever be
MAJORITY of marriages are this
You’re a man and you shouldn’t be looking to a woman for emotional stability of any kind. My father has NEVER cried to my mother, never. There is a very good chance she will lose respect for you even if you don’t realize for years.
Go to your boys if you’re having issues. They’ll understand. Don’t be an emotionless robot but understand any weakness is innately unattractive to many of them.
Be irreplaceable brehs. That’s the key to respect in everything you do.
I hear you and I did say don’t be an emotionless robot. I see the dynamic of your family and that’s definitely ideal. Modern times things are extremely different man. I’d assume given your intelligence/ upbringing you’ve done well and will probably want a good looking woman. If she’s from the West and attractive then a lot of what I say applies at least initially. Not all of these women btw I don’t want to generalize but social media has had an immense impact on my generation.At this point in life I don't care to have a woman if I gotta do all this extra, frankly if I can't get real support from the woman (not wiping my tears), but noticing when a breh is mentally fatigued or allow me to occasionally get my shyt off about all the things we balance/manage as brehs/humans, outside of the time we're together.
If I gotta hide my struggles from the woman and put on a facade after I already bagged/claimed her she's essentially useless outside of child rearing and I'm not pressed for children.
I've watched my mom be able to read when my dad is mentally preoccupied and give him space, we lived in a 1 bedroom growing up and I'd hear them talking from the living room late at night/early morning about life, planning, regrets.
Make no mistake, there's hierarchy, but my mother has say, and complete dominion on certain things. It's like a President/VP power dynamic. I realize most modern women, and most women in my age group legitimately aren't reared for to be this type of woman anymore. My mom makes no pumpfakes on what she can and can't do. Everything she can do for self she does, and she maintains the home. Car issues ---> Dad, Bill Management ---> Dad, Financial Planning ---> Dad, and there's no friction because the roles are set.
Society moving away from defined gender roles in relationship has had and will continue to have long term ramifications, because a lot of people particularly women pumpfake on what they want to manage/be responsible for in a relationship as well as what they want. The "wants" is important as women's emotions are fleeting and men are supposed to be the contrasting constant, when people (women) who are naturally more volatile in terms of mood try to set the terms or have the leverage, the man lives and dies with her wants. When a man who has genuine interest in the woman + a potential family set terms they live and by trying to find what best to achieve/sustain their relationship/family. That's fundamentally why I always say the girls gotta like the guy a little more for the most stability/optimal outcome
This is why I have age limits on seriously dating. If a woman wouldn't fukk you when she was 18-25 and she had met you then, or you know you couldn't catch her eye without bread, there's not a basal/primal attraction. If she doesn't lust for you there's a certain amount of leverage you'll never have in the relationship.
Also women rarely love men, they love men for what they perceive them to be, what the man can do for them, and how the man can make them feel. Not necessarily the man in his natural genuine state idiosyncrasies and all.
All of that (including lust) goes both ways, and men (as one myself ) rarely love women without the same types of contingencies, just different criteria.
love is brought through providing a certain comfort that one doesn’t want to lose. For women it may be financial or physical security, for men it may be sexual satisfaction and a sense of responsibility. Love is formed through finding someone who fulfills your selfish desires. That’s not gender based.
This is why I have age limits on seriously dating. If a woman wouldn't fukk you when she was 18-25 and she had met you then, or you know you couldn't catch her eye without bread, there's not a basal/primal attraction. If she doesn't lust for you there's a certain amount of leverage you'll never have in the relationship.
Also women rarely love men, they love men for what they perceive them to be, what the man can do for them, and how the man can make them feel. Not necessarily the man in his natural genuine state idiosyncrasies and all.
I feel love is a choice. Marriage was never about love. Marrying for love is a new age feminine concept and fickle and in this climate it’s much worse. How u could u ever truly love a woman in this age when there’s so many and 99% are hoes looking for a placeholder/stepfather? How could they love a man when there’s always a taller, richer, better looking guy around the corner?
Let’s not forget most people are raised in dysfunction. Honestly romantic love doesn’t work at all, especially when u remove courtship and remove the father from selecting the mate for the woman. Also without both desiring to love God and do right by each other for that reason, it’s really pointless to marry. To even get married these days is just like spinning a wheel of fortune.
The reason marriage ain’t even happening no more is because use be women thought they can catch dudes by waiting 90 days regardless of past, but now most dudes know that women are always playing a chastity/celebrate role depending on who the guy is and her goals.
Mufukka can you buy that?You a car theif!
TRUTHIt’s always interesting to see whether people like what they attract. Because that’s what it comes down to.
There are more than just users attracted to you usually. There are plenty of decent people who may find you desirable. But the question is, do you want those individuals that act right and are interested in you.
Who you choose to entertain, worry about, pursue, woo, spend time with is a reflection of what you really want.
People have a hard time understanding that everything that glitters ain’t gold or marriage material. But once they learn to strike a balance between the physical attraction and other relationship oriented qualities that can sustain something real over time, then a lot of this stuff melts away. But that comes with personal growth, self-knowledge, attending to personal needs and such.
This is why I have age limits on seriously dating. If a woman wouldn't fukk you when she was 18-25 and she had met you then, or you know you couldn't catch her eye without bread, there's not a basal/primal attraction. If she doesn't lust for you there's a certain amount of leverage you'll never have in the relationship.
Also women rarely love men, they love men for what they perceive them to be, what the man can do for them, and how the man can make them feel. Not necessarily the man in his natural genuine state idiosyncrasies and all.
I get what you mean in a literal sense but for me again OBVIOUSLY I would want her to feel the same way about the relationship. Ideally we both be getting the same perceived long term benefit.
In reality there is a "winner" in most relationships or a person who feels more happy/content. I personally think relationships work better when the woman loves the man more because it allows for fluctuations without the commitments shaking. From what I've seen when it's even all it takes is her losing a few pounds, buddy losing his job, a lurking work bf, etc. to tip the scales. I don't want to say women are more fickle in relationships but I've always perceived it that way if the man and the woman are entering the relationship based off love/attraction/enjoyment of company vs. a guy looking for consistent sex with a woman that isn't too bothersome, or a guy that wants someone to cook and clean for him, etc.
1000% you're correct, men have always love harder because that's meant literal work/providing/sacrifice as a minimum, in addition to validation and affection. To really make the cypher complete you'd ideally be able to be vulnerable with the woman but that's the catch-22. Woman don't like that shyt. They want to confide, cry to, be supported emotionally by, have tears and fears calmed by YOU, the man. Once you show chinks in your armor the dynamics often change and now she has the ammo she needs to shatter the mans heart and subsequently his mental. I know I have one actual love left in me, after that not a chance I'm as vulnerable, shyt I've had mild heartbreak and it makes you more precautious and hesitant to trust/open up. When I meet women I tell them tongue in cheek I'm boring and emotionally unavailable and that's the case for most women I'll come across because we won't have similar intellects/interests/taste, and I'm able to ID their surface level reason for interest because as aforementioned it's not me as a whole, it's my car, my physique, my humor.
People grossly understate how understanding people and having the ability to relate/connect to different people/be personable doesn't translate to you finding someone you have a genuine connection with, that goes for women, acquaintances, and associates