George Zimmerman is broke and gained 105 lbs.

Morph

Rookie
Joined
Jan 10, 2013
Messages
338
Reputation
0
Daps
279
Reppin
NULL
Nah, Morph youre ignoring the fact that GZ was stalking son...
It's difficult to say that GZ stalked or 'hunted' Trayvon. They didn't know each other. To stalk or hunt, you must have an idea what of what you're going after. You've got to prove malicious intent or pre-meditation. I think the prosecutor skipped the grand jury because that is very difficult to prove. Since Zimmerman volunteered for neighborhood watch, he could argue logically, that his brief pursuit of Trayvon was in 'good faith'.

I'm not defending him, but it's difficult for me to accept that Zimmerman woke up that morning intent on 'hunting' down Trayvon and killing him for whatever reason.
 

intilectual recipricol

Killin fake hip hop
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
12,041
Reputation
-3,785
Daps
16,512
Reppin
The Brook
It's difficult to say that GZ stalked or 'hunted' Trayvon. They didn't know each other. To stalk or hunt, you must have an idea what of what you're going after. You've got to prove malicious intent or pre-meditation. I think the prosecutor skipped the grand jury because that is very difficult to prove. Since Zimmerman volunteered for neighborhood watch, he could argue logically, that his brief pursuit of Trayvon was in 'good faith'.

I'm not defending him, but it's difficult for me to accept that Zimmerman woke up that morning intent on 'hunting' down Trayvon and killing him for whatever reason.

Intent doesnt require him to wake up with the notion to murder, all he needs is a mere moment and it can be considered 1st degree murder... he had more than enough time. Youre also still ignoring Martin's right to defend himself.
 

Suicide King

#OldBlack
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
4,902
Reputation
745
Daps
7,317
It's difficult to say that GZ stalked or 'hunted' Trayvon. They didn't know each other. To stalk or hunt, you must have an idea what of what you're going after. You've got to prove malicious intent or pre-meditation. I think the prosecutor skipped the grand jury because that is very difficult to prove. Since Zimmerman volunteered for neighborhood watch, he could argue logically, that his brief pursuit of Trayvon was in 'good faith'.

I'm not defending him, but it's difficult for me to accept that Zimmerman woke up that morning intent on 'hunting' down Trayvon and killing him for whatever reason.

Its manslaughter, because I don't think Zimmerman is a murderer.

Standing your ground is one thing, but actually walking 70 feet to that ground is a stretch and I don't see how the law can still apply.

He was clearly the aggressor with a gun in his waist chasing a teenager. Its a crazy world if a grown man can kill a kid or someone minding their own business with no consequences.
 

Morph

Rookie
Joined
Jan 10, 2013
Messages
338
Reputation
0
Daps
279
Reppin
NULL
Intent doesnt require him to wake up with the notion to murder, all he needs is a mere moment and it can be considered 1st degree murder... he had more than enough time.

Yes, but did that mere moment ever materialize?



Youre also still ignoring Martin's right to defend himself.
Here's the thing that's got me puzzled concerning self defense:

The autopsy reveals that Trayvon's knuckles were bruised or swollen. No bruising in the face or any other part of the body. It doesn't appear that Zimmerman physically attacked him first....BUT if he did, he didn't land a single punch. If Trayvon attacked first, then what right did he have to defend himself if he was the initial aggressor? Here's the tricky part: It's possible that Zimmerman did throw the first punch and horribly missed, in that case Trayvon did have the right to defend himself. Case closed. Then again, Trayvon stood about 6'2 and 150 lbs, not an easy target to miss?



It's manslaughter
I agree. Zimmerman's an idiot, delusional, etc, but I doubt he's a murderer.
 

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,549
Reputation
3,352
Daps
54,298
Reppin
CALI
Yes, but did that mere moment ever materialize?




Here's the thing that's got me puzzled concerning self defense:

The autopsy reveals that Trayvon's knuckles were bruised or swollen. No bruising in the face or any other part of the body. It doesn't appear that Zimmerman physically attacked him first....BUT if he did, he didn't land a single punch. If Trayvon attacked first, then what right did he have to defend himself if he was the initial aggressor? Here's the tricky part: It's possible that Zimmerman did throw the first punch and horribly missed, in that case Trayvon did have the right to defend himself. Case closed. Then again, Trayvon stood about 6'2 and 150 lbs, not an easy target to miss?




I agree. Zimmerman's an idiot, delusional, etc, but I doubt he's a murderer.

:what: so you saying even tho George followed this innocent kid around for no reason, had a gun and most likely flashed it at trayvon, for the simple fact that he was black in a non urban area,all this after a police officer told him not to follow this kid, that he wasn't the aggressor?

I'm sorry bro, sounds like the kid was defending himself to me.

What would you do if some racist dude with a gun started following you and chasing you down?( assuming your not a cac):ld:

I'd punch that motherfukker right in his face too, in self defense, I'd fear for my life which is probly what trayvon was doing when he decided to defend his self


I'm 5'9 and 150, I'm thin as fukk, so basically trayvon was a tall scrawny kid and he was suppose to look threatening?
 

TAYLONDO SAMSWORTHY

Veteran
Verified
Supporter
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
13,986
Reputation
30,882
Daps
113,537
George Zimmerman's legal team say he is out of money AGAIN and must raise at least $30,000 a month in donations - as lead attorney pushes to delay murder trial | Mail Online



zimmerman1.jpg


:flabbynsick:

:dead:
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,002
Daps
132,749
Yes, but did that mere moment ever materialize?




Here's the thing that's got me puzzled concerning self defense:

The autopsy reveals that Trayvon's knuckles were bruised or swollen. No bruising in the face or any other part of the body. It doesn't appear that Zimmerman physically attacked him first....BUT if he did, he didn't land a single punch. If Trayvon attacked first, then what right did he have to defend himself if he was the initial aggressor? Here's the tricky part: It's possible that Zimmerman did throw the first punch and horribly missed, in that case Trayvon did have the right to defend himself. Case closed. Then again, Trayvon stood about 6'2 and 150 lbs, not an easy target to miss?




I agree. Zimmerman's an idiot, delusional, etc, but I doubt he's a murderer.
So if you initiate a conflict then lose the ensuing fight, you have the right to murder the guy who kicked your ass? :ohhh:

Maybe I should try this with Jared Allen or J. J. Watt.
 

intilectual recipricol

Killin fake hip hop
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
12,041
Reputation
-3,785
Daps
16,512
Reppin
The Brook
So if you initiate a conflict then lose the ensuing fight, you have the right to murder the guy who kicked your ass? :ohhh:

Maybe I should try this with Jared Allen or J. J. Watt.

word. It just doesnt make a lick of sense. But then again, I doubt that argument works if the colors are reversed. Just a hunch.
 

Suicide King

#OldBlack
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
4,902
Reputation
745
Daps
7,317
word. It just doesnt make a lick of sense. But then again, I doubt that argument works if the colors are reversed. Just a hunch.

Hopefully the jury examines all the evidence, and realize you can't accost and provoke someone without expecting things to get out of hand.

With all the evidence, I still feel Zimmerman might no get convicted, because they might feel he is not responsible for the events of that day.
 
Top