observe
Banned
lol
Last edited:
Genetic evidence suggests European migrants may have influenced the origins of India's caste system
- Thread starter bouncy
- Start date
observe
Banned
edit
Last edited:
Tommy Knocks
retired
my nikka did you read your link? he lost dumb ass.
GetInTheTruck
Member
my nikka did you read your link? he lost dumb ass.
chandragupta the gawd
a king who was low-caste by the way
his advisor and military strategist was a brahmin though
Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis
googling gay porn :ahh:
not very educated on the caste system..
but just to let yall nikkas, in my highschool classes they are teaching us that invading aryans did create the caste system..
if that isnt true they need to fix that shyt pronto villa..
but just to let yall nikkas, in my highschool classes they are teaching us that invading aryans did create the caste system..
if that isnt true they need to fix that shyt pronto villa..
my nikka did you read your link? he lost dumb ass.
My nikka did you read your post? You said Greeks never made it to India when they were all up in Punjab
Tommy Knocks
retired
No nikka, they never made it as in never conquered it and installed a system. Let alone a caste system. They won like 1 battle than got that ass waxed. He also tried to come down to Ethiopia and saw what was really good and went back home too. Neither India nor Ethiopia have greek influence. This is common knowledge. I know my world history playboy :rosslol:My nikka did you read your post? You said Greeks never made it to India when they were all up in Punjab
observe
Banned
My nikka did you read your post? You said Greeks never made it to India when they were all up in Punjab
lol blackzeus
yeah tommy you sure know your world history..tell me fool how can a place get conquered and colonized and have no influence by the colonizers?
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080901081554AAdKztw
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greco-Buddhism
you know that alexander influenced lower egypt..how could he not influence india
Last edited:
GetInTheTruck
Member
What does this have to do with the caste system though.
Any influence the Greeks may have had on India is minor and pretty much insignificant. The mughals however are a different story.
Tommy Knocks
retired
do you know how massive india is? do you know how many sects there are? do you think the british had any significant influence on the chinese? outside HK? of course not. ZERO. so why would india? you are giving cacs far too much credit and to top it off that was egypt, which is extremely close promixity, egypt also influenced them.......way more.
are you seriously comparing alexanders conquest on egypt to india? tell me how many kings they had in india which ruled all of india, because I can name a few in egypt but I can seem to think of any in india. and I know for sure they'd have made like 55 movies on the conquest of india, yet I cant think of any. hmmmmm
observe
Banned
please just stop..ive heard enough from you
the british influenced western attire, railways, military technology all thru china
Last edited:
Tommy Knocks
retired
railways and military technology is not an influence, thats just a transfer of technology which has been done all throughout history without a country stepping foot in the region. if thats the case china has influenced all of europe for thousands of years. tea is not british.
you are a fukking smart dumb nikka.
GetInTheTruck
Member
@GetInTheTruck We all know the Aryan invasion theory is all but debunked at this point, but isn't the Aryan migration theory also iffy in light of recent genetic evidence?
I'm arguing with some guy IRL, and this article seems to support a good deal of what you've been saying:
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/indians-are-not-descendants-of-aryans-study/1/163645.html
As an aside (somewhat related to the thread title), cacs seem to liberally pick and choose what constitutes "white" or "Caucasian" - one minute it's only Anglo's and Slavs, the next it's every single race on the planet that isn't East Asian, North/South American, Austronesian, Melanesian or sub-Saharan African minus Kushytic people (cacs sometimes claim them too
).
I'm arguing with some guy IRL, and this article seems to support a good deal of what you've been saying:
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/indians-are-not-descendants-of-aryans-study/1/163645.html
As an aside (somewhat related to the thread title), cacs seem to liberally pick and choose what constitutes "white" or "Caucasian" - one minute it's only Anglo's and Slavs, the next it's every single race on the planet that isn't East Asian, North/South American, Austronesian, Melanesian or sub-Saharan African minus Kushytic people (cacs sometimes claim them too
).
Last edited: