General Trump Administration F**kery Thread (2025-2029)

[Outlaw]

OMG allowing trans people to exist without being harassed or forced to wear certain clothing.

Why are the dems pushing this radical stuff on society


This is not what the bill says. This is straight out the republicac fear mongering playbook. Make some false sensational claim in order to justify hating and stripping rights from folks.

Same they do with DEI, Same they do with immigrants. You are just ok with it on this subject cause you don’t like trannies either.

An “anti harassment” bill in colorado does not make trannies “the avatar of democrats” nor the top of the democratic billanother sensational lie made up by you.

Logic and sound reason says trannies exist and they should be free from harassment like everyone else.

The bill says misgendering a child can be considered in a child custody dispute.

I don’t hate trannies but I dislike that disproportionately amplifying their visibility correlates to men being repulsed by Democrats.

It’s good that you passionately defend the course democrats are on when it comes to defending trannies.

I hope you’re right and everything I’ve heard from firsthand real life sources about men being turned off to democrats due to Dems being too concerned about sexuality and trannies in the real world is wrong.


Hell you could make a thread in TLR and ask the both siders and non voters why they don’t fukk with Dems and see what they say.

Y’all gotta get out of your echo chambers.

We can either meet voters we’re they’re at and inch them towards our orthodoxy or we can ram it down their throats and suffer the consequences

 

[wire28]

The bill says misgendering a child can be considered in a child custody dispute.

I don’t hate trannies but I dislike that disproportionately amplifying their visibility correlates to men being repulsed by Democrats.

It’s good that you passionately defend the course democrats are on when it comes to defending trannies.

I hope you’re right and everything I’ve heard from firsthand real life sources about men being turned off to democrats due to Dems being too concerned about sexuality and trannies in the real world is wrong.


Hell you could make a thread in TLR and ask the both siders and non voters why they don’t fukk with Dems and see what they say.

Y’all gotta get out of your echo chambers.

We can either meet voters we’re they’re at and inch them towards our orthodoxy or we can ram it down their throats and suffer the consequences

We can do what now

 

[MeachTheMonster]

The bill says misgendering a child can be considered in a child custody dispute.

Read the bill not the headlines.

The bill says one parent affirming gender care, can’t be the reason another parent extracts the kid to another state.

I don’t hate trannies but I dislike that disproportionately amplifying their visibility correlates to men being repulsed by Democrats.

Nobody is amplifying their visibility but you.

You posted that article, and mislead about what’s in the actual bill then tried to claim that bill made trannies the face of dems. YOU SAID ALL THAT, not democratic leadership. Last i checked everytime they get in front of a mic they are talking about how terrible the trump administration is.

It’s good that you passionately defend the course democrats are on when it comes to defending trannies.

I hope you’re right and everything I’ve heard from firsthand real life sources about men being turned off to democrats due to Dems being too concerned about sexuality and trannies in the real world is wrong.

Hell you could make a thread in TLR and ask the both siders and non voters why they don’t fukk with Dems and see what they say.

Y’all gotta get out of your echo chambers.

We can either meet voters we’re they’re at and inch them towards our orthodoxy or we can ram it down their throats and suffer the consequences

Again. If those guys would sacrifice all of what we are getting from the republicans just so they can call transgender women by their male name, then those people are not serious in the first place.

TLR nikkas was gone vote for cornell west. Dems throwing tranies under the bus wouldn’t make those people any less ridiculous.

 

[Loose]

Read the bill not the headlines.

The bill says one parent affirming gender care, can’t be the reason another parent extracts the kid to another state.


Nobody is amplifying their visibility but you.

You posted that article, and mislead about what’s in the actual bill then tried to claim that bill made trannies the face of dems. YOU SAID ALL THAT, not democratic leadership. Last i checked everytime they get in front of a mic they are talking about how terrible the trump administration is.


Again. If those guys would sacrifice all of what we are getting from the republicans just so they can call transgender women by their male name, then those people are not serious in the first place.

TLR nikkas was gone vote for cornell west. Dems throwing tranies under the bus wouldn’t make those people and less ridiculous.

Covid broke some of these dudes brains, they literally fall over off any right wing framing with reading headlines

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Covid broke some of these dudes brains, they literally fall over off any right wing framing without reading actual headlines

Agreed but you ain’t the messenger for this message

 

[Outlaw]

Read the bill not the headlines.

The bill says one parent affirming gender care, can’t be the reason another parent extracts the kid to another state.


Nobody is amplifying their visibility but you.

You posted that article, and mislead about what’s in the actual bill then tried to claim that bill made trannies the face of dems. YOU SAID ALL THAT, not democratic leadership. Last i checked everytime they get in front of a mic they are talking about how terrible the trump administration is.


Again. If those guys would sacrifice all of what we are getting from the republicans just so they can call transgender women by their male name, then those people are not serious in the first place.

TLR nikkas was gone vote for cornell west. Dems throwing tranies under the bus wouldn’t make those people any less ridiculous.

There’s an obvious agenda for trans acceptance done by Dems and that correlates to men being repulsed by the party.

You can deny that all you want but it won’t change masculinity problems democrats face.

There are probably more Native American voters that vote democrats than trannies but I can’t think of any underlying agenda designed to increase the visibility of Native Americans.

I’m using a random example to prove a point, transgenders are such a small percentage of the population and shouldn’t be no where close to being a top visibility demographic for the democrats yet they are due to an agenda.

Democrats should defend trans rights 100% but they shouldn’t be a disproportionate face of the party. It’s repulsive to men

 

[Loose]

Agreed but you ain’t the messenger for this message

You don't see me fear mongering over random trannys and illegals, I'm only on dems neck for not offering my fellow constitutes anything

 

[Reality Check]

Nobody is sitting at home thinking.

“Damn this trump shyt is chaos, the economy fukked, the dollar is losing power, allies hate us, egg prices up, can’t afford a new car……..but if only the dems would condemn trannies i’d vote for them ”

And in 2026 that issue will be irrelevant thanks to Trump throwing a grenade at the economy. If Dems had a good messaging department, they would be on brand with saying "You should take that up with the Republican controlled House, Republican controlled Senate, Republican controlled White House, and (if applicable) Republican controlled State Legislatures." to anyone still being threatened about Trans people being a thing even though the Trans population is somewhere like 0.5% of the 340 million people in this country.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[Loose]

Ny Dems should be ashamed for letting Mike Lawler win his seat

 

[choc_cardigan]

The fact this thread keeps getting derailed by tranny talk is exhibit zz that this site has jumped the shark and America is cooked.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

There’s an obvious agenda for trans acceptance done by Dems and that correlates to men being repulsed by the party.

The only agenda is affording them basic human rights. The people “repulsed” by the party are bigots. Trannies aren’t their red line issue. Caring for other people PERIOD is their issue. Nothing dems can do about that.

You can deny that all you want but it won’t change WHITE masculinity problems democrats face.

FTFY, and no there is no cure for nasty cac man.

There are probably more Native American voters that vote democrats than trannies but I can’t think of any underlying agenda designed to increase the visibility of Native Americans.

I’m using a random example to prove a point, transgenders are such a small percentage of the population and shouldn’t be no where close to being a top visibility demographic for the democrats yet they are due to an agenda.

Democrats should defend trans rights 100% but they shouldn’t be a disproportionate face of the party. It’s repulsive to men

New Mexico adopts new law to fight hairstyle discrimination

SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham on Monday signed into law legislation that prohibits discrimination based on traditional hairstyles and head coverings.

apnews.com

Literally the same as the story you posted. Dems fighting for native americans freedom of identity and culture.

Only difference is we don’t get nasty cac man and parjeet sharing these stories every ten minutes and we don’t get people like you calling natives the “face of the party” cause somebody dared to fight for their basic human rights.

 

[Kingcobrakai]

The fact this thread keeps getting derailed by tranny talk is exhibit zz that this site has jumped the shark and America is cooked.

I’m glad I’m not the only who sees it.

It’s over for America. fukk, Teddy Pendergrass and Eddie Murphy only got called nasty motherfukkers over associating with then 20-40 years ago, white people would have men in drag on national TV shows, and they were just here…. Not bothering anyone.

And now it’s the central issue that people want to talk about…… like damn. We have to pick a side now? We can’t just not care?

 

[darkmanp]

And in 2026 that issue will be irrelevant thanks to Trump throwing a grenade at the economy. If Dems had a good messaging department, they would be on brand with saying "You should take that up with the Republican controlled House, Republican controlled Senate, Republican controlled White House, and (if applicable) Republican controlled State Legislatures." to anyone still being threatened about Trans people being a thing even though the Trans population is somewhere like 0.5% of the 340 million people in this country.

Problem is, Republicans will bring up trans to make it a relevant issue, and force democrats to defend it. I agree that it is a distraction issue, but it has been proven an effective one to help Republicans win public opinion on an issue. It's called common sense rhetoric.

When asked SPECIFICALLY should Trans women be allowed in women sports, the answer cant be yes or Trans women are women too. Most people with basic common sense are against that. Trump himself said on TV that he brings up the Trans issue around election time because it helps Republicans win.

Even when Democrats try to ignore the issue and call it a distraction, Republicans point out that Dems are trying to avoid the issue and support Trans in women's sports by default. Same thing when it comes to trans using womens restrooms and locker rooms.

Again, while I agree that it shouldn't at all be a relevant issue in American politics, it is where we are today. The issue is not going away until Democrats put it to bed.