Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,382
Reputation
2,795
Daps
139,441
Even if what you’re saying is true the focus should still be on the Republicans doing it
I agree it should and our elected lawmakers should be calling that out. But instead they're putting their heads in the sand pretending like republicans aren't disappearing civilians and putting them into some remote prison in Louisiana
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,382
Reputation
2,795
Daps
139,441
@Serious politically I'm do not align with people like @the cac mamba @Outlaw, they look lead the democratic party primarily from the view of popularity politics with zero risk sum. They would be against the civil rights movement in the 60s because of the risk it takes when potentially losing the majority ( white men) , they're political cowards and conservative leaning centrist.
 

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
6,685
Reputation
328
Daps
21,082
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
@Serious politically I'm do not align with people like @the cac mamba @Outlaw, they look lead the democratic party primarily from the view of popularity politics with zero risk sum. They would be against the civil rights movement in the 60s because of the risk it takes when potentially losing the majority ( white men) , they're political cowards and conservative leaning centrist.
@Serious don’t dap this liar. He can’t debate his position without strawmanning.

If we want to play the strawman game

@Loose would oppose LBJ due to Vietnam and hypothetically if LBJ would have waited to sign the civil rights act in a second term he would have held his vote for LBJ and black civil rights for the Vietnamese
 

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
6,685
Reputation
328
Daps
21,082
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
Ironically my strawmanned political positions that @Loose tries to apply to me are more aligned with LBJ and civil rights era democrats than his are. (Uber liberal domestic policies but hawkish foreign policy ). Stop trying to debate me bro, you’re out of your depth.

Your twitter algorithms aren’t calibrated to counter my positions without you lying and getting emotional


IokY0k7.gif
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,382
Reputation
2,795
Daps
139,441
@Serious don’t dap this liar. He can’t debate his position without strawmanning.

If we want to play the strawman game

@Loose would oppose LBJ due to Vietnam and hypothetically if LBJ would have waited to sign the civil rights act in a second term he would have held his vote for LBJ and black civil rights for the Vietnamese
This doesn't even make sense you're unequivocally a very stupid poster, not only was the voting rights act not signed until 1965, black folks still protested against both the Vietnam war AND the violation of our civil rights after that. You would be up here arguing that we have to primarily focus on eradicating the Vietnamese threat, we can't worry about civil rights or dead us soliders yet :dead: . You would be holding the water just like the coward you're right now. You would have chastised Muhammad ali for not going to Vietnam
 

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
6,685
Reputation
328
Daps
21,082
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
This doesn't even make sense you're unequivocally a very stupid poster, not only was the voting rights act not signed until 1965, black folks still protested against both the Vietnam war AND the violation of our civil rights after that. You would be up here arguing that we have to primarily focus on eradicating the Vietnamese threat, we can't worry about civil rights or dead us soliders yet :dead: . You would be holding the water just like the coward you're right now. You would have chastised Muhammad ali for not going to Vietnam
Do you know what the word hypothetically means?
 

jj23

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Messages
25,279
Reputation
5,976
Daps
115,771
I swear, I feel like slapping somebody if I hear, he's joking or he doesn't mean it. Defund the military or remove him and Vance. Would be nice if Congress had balls
That's a ww3 moment whether he thinjs so or not ,and it's America in one corner against everyone else.

Lose lose for the states either way.
 
Top