Mike Nasty
Superstar
I'm guessing there's money in owning that video and whoever her handlers are want it.
Full circle: Hawk tuah girl suing breh that made her famous
- Thread starter newarkhiphop
- Start date
Pawgs thoAin’t no way white women be white womening. Bruh can’t get a shoutout, or make an appearance on her podcast. She’s just gonna throw bruh under the bus like that. And knowing her luck and the system. She’s probably going to win this shyt smh.
Reaction videos exist in a legal gray area when it comes to copyright law. There are a few key factors that allow many creators to post reaction videos without facing copyright claims:
## Fair Use Doctrine
Many reaction videos fall under the "fair use" doctrine in copyright law[3]. Fair use allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission for purposes such as criticism, commentary, parody, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research. Reaction videos often qualify as commentary or criticism.
## Transformative Nature
For a reaction video to be considered fair use, it generally needs to be "transformative" - meaning it adds new meaning, expression, or message to the original work[3]. Creators who provide substantial commentary, analysis, or unique perspective may have a stronger fair use claim.
## Limited Use of Original Content
Reaction videos typically only show portions of the original work, not the entire thing. Using limited excerpts rather than the full copyrighted material strengthens the fair use argument[1].
## Adding Value
Successful reaction videos add value through the creator's personality, insights, humor, or expertise. Simply re-broadcasting content with minimal commentary is more likely to face copyright issues[2].
## Platform Policies
Sites like YouTube have systems in place (like Content ID) to detect copyrighted material. However, they also have policies that may allow reaction-style content if it meets certain criteria[4].
## Permission and Partnerships
Some reaction creators may obtain permission from or partner with the original content owners. This is especially common for music reaction channels[5].
It's important to note that fair use is determined on a case-by-case basis. While many reaction videos persist without issue, creators always run some risk of copyright claims. To reduce this risk, reaction video creators should:
- Provide substantial original commentary
- Use only necessary portions of the original work
- Clearly credit original sources
- Avoid monetizing videos that rely heavily on others' content
- Be prepared to respond to any copyright claims
Ultimately, the legality of reaction videos remains somewhat ambiguous. While many thrive under fair use, others may be removed if challenged by copyright holders.
Citations:
[1] How to Create Reactions Videos
[2] How To Record and Edit a Reaction Video: 4 Top Tips — Captions
[3] How to Make YouTube Reaction Videos
[4] Boost reaction video reach with these growth tactics
[5] Reaction Videos: Why They're So Popular
[6] How to edit YouTube reaction videos | Clipchamp Blog
[7]
[8]
Doobie Doo
Veteran
Well there goes her 15 minutes of fame. Obviously some lawyer got in her ear and now everyone is going to turn on her and make some dumb nickname like Hawk Karen or some shyt.
Whatever legal discourse or rights she may have in this situation she is trading it in for a negative public opinion so I hope she is getting $$$ out this lawsuit some how cuz it's going to end her career.
Whatever legal discourse or rights she may have in this situation she is trading it in for a negative public opinion so I hope she is getting $$$ out this lawsuit some how cuz it's going to end her career.
Voice of Reason
Veteran
Black folks deserve to get backstabbed by these culture vulture crackas.
We need to learn to stop falling for the same tricks.
Black social media finds this cac Jack Pauls antics entertaining.
I wonder if she tried to buy the rights off of him or just went straight to suing. Hope he has a good lawyer.
I doubt her cac fanbase cares about her suing a bruh
Last edited:
Doobie Doo
Veteran
The Internet always turns on Karens. at least in the short term. She's literally trying to steal this man's footage that she has no legal right to.
The way her fans are moving I doubt it but we’ll see. I wouldn’t be surprised if those cacs stay on code.
TELL ME YA CHEESIN FAM?
I walk around a little edgy already
Pawgset looking shaky outchea
don't give a fukk about either party
you'd think his lawyers would tell him to just give it to her, if she has a case. unless they're counting on the jury laughing her out of court
you'd think his lawyers would tell him to just give it to her, if she has a case. unless they're counting on the jury laughing her out of court
