fukk 60 FPS on consoles :camby:

[daze23]

the struggle continues...

 

[Ciggavelli]

30 and 60 is HUGH. shyt is like slow mo at 30fps

 

[The G.O.D II]

Those are different games. Even with both at 60 they feel different.




I can too on PC. But it's a bit different on consoles. I can't really tell

How so?

 

[MeachTheMonster]

30 and 60 is HUGH. shyt is like slow mo at 30fps

On consoles?

How so?

COD is still faster and more responsive than Battlfield regardless of framerate

 

[Fatboi1]

30 and 60 is HUGH. shyt is like slow mo at 30fps

what about 60 and 120??

 

[Ciggavelli]

On consoles?


COD is still faster and more responsive than Battlfield regardless of framerate

I dunno about consoles, but I don't know why it would be any different

what about 60 and 120??

I dunno about that. My monitors are 60hz. Plus there's no way I'm getting 120 in 3 monitors anyway.

 

[AkaDemiK]

you can easily tell the difference between 30fps and 60fps especially in shooters.....but pointing out 1080p games and 900p or 720p is a whole other ball game...

 

[MeachTheMonster]

I dunno about consoles, but I don't know why it would be any different



I dunno about that. My monitors are 60hz. Plus there's no way I'm getting 120 in 3 monitors anyway.

Here's digital foundry explaining why its different

Unfortunately, PC games with a 30fps cap typically fail to evenly match your display's refresh rate leading to gameplay that appears even less consistent than 30fps really should. As we discussed in our article examining frame-rate earlier this summer, achieving a proper 30fps update on a 60Hz display requires each frame to persist for exactly 33ms. Unfortunately, when using a soft lock most PC titles run into frame consistency issues and ultimately wind up displaying some frames for just 16ms while others persist for three times that amount of time. Uneven persistence results in visible micro-stutter. So, by default, 30fps in a PC game almost always appears less consistent than a 30fps console game.

 

[TPL01]

After playing on the 360 for years, getting that X1 and playing BF4 I was like

Definitely can see a difference

 

[The G.O.D II]

On consoles?


COD is still faster and more responsive than Battlfield regardless of framerate

Yes on last gen. But with BF at 60fps this gen COD no longer has that advantage. Esp since IW nerfed the speed of COD with ghost. BF4 actually has a more faster pace then Ghost

 

[REKT]

In about 2 to 3 years, nikkas gonna complain that 60 fps still ain't enough. I miss the days of 8 vs 16 bit.

 

[Ill-Mind]

When I lock the FPS to 30 in TLOU Remastered, the difference between the two is immediately noticeable, I don't know how you can't see the difference

 

[Plexxx]

Play the original TLOU then the remake and See if u still feel that way

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Yes on last gen. But with BF at 60fps this gen COD no longer has that advantage. Esp since IW nerfed the speed of COD with ghost. BF4 actually has a more faster pace then Ghost

So like I said you can't compare two totally different games.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Comparing last gen to current gen isn't a good comparison either. The extra resolution and graphical effects like motion blur AA make it so the games look a lot smoother too. It's not just the framerate