Freddie Roach on Chris Algieri: He's nothing special....Pacquiao is gonna KO him

Black_Jesus

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
16,281
Reputation
723
Daps
21,256
Reppin
from the home of coca-cola, i'm not referring to s
It's not just about Mayweather. There are many fighters at 140 and 147 that he would have had available to him instead of someone like Chris Algieria.

Pac isnt guaranteed anything being a free agent though. Fighters make more money signed to a long term deal... Floyd signed exclusively to showtime, why weren't you bytching then??
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
1,373
Reputation
100
Daps
1,678
Reppin
NULL
But Floyd doesn't use GB for certain fights.. he uses them for evey fight. Floyd new he was never fighting Pac when refused to give up a percentage of ppv revenue.. Nobody is standing in the way of that fight happening except for Floyd, GB willing to work with TR, but dumb nikkas like you still think Pac being signed to TR is why the fight aint happen yet :mjlol:
It's really not about Floyd. Pacquiao is fighting Chris Algieri because he has no other options. Had he remained a free agent he could have a choice of many, many opponents.
 

Black_Jesus

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
16,281
Reputation
723
Daps
21,256
Reppin
from the home of coca-cola, i'm not referring to s
It's really not about Floyd. Pacquiao is fighting Chris Algieri because he has no other options. Had he remained a free agent he could have a choice of many, many opponents.

It doesn't matter, Pac getting paid a guaranteed minimum purse regardless who he fights. Just like Floyd who signed a 6 fight deal with Showtime, and didn't have any good options outside of Pac who he refuses to share ppv revenue with. Only reason you're bytching is cause its Pacquiao. Is it pacs fault JMM refuse to fight him?
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
1,373
Reputation
100
Daps
1,678
Reppin
NULL
It doesn't matter, Pac getting paid a guaranteed minimum purse regardless who he fights. Just like Floyd who signed a 6 fight deal with Showtime, and didn't have any good options outside of Pac who he refuses to share ppv revenue with.
I'm pretty sure Pacquiao would be paid handsomely for fighting a Thurman or Garcia or anyone else he fought. Kinda like Cotto, who made a career high purse against Floyd. The purse is dependent on name power and, as a free agent, Pacquiao would have been able to cut his middle man out.
 

Black_Jesus

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
16,281
Reputation
723
Daps
21,256
Reppin
from the home of coca-cola, i'm not referring to s
I'm pretty sure Pacquiao would be paid handsomely for fighting a Thurman or Garcia or anyone else he fought. Kinda like Cotto, who made a career high purse against Floyd. The purse is dependent on name power and, as a free agent, Pacquiao would have been able to cut his middle man out.
Garcia or Thurman dont really want to fight Pacquiao though..
 

George's Dilemma

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
27,794
Reputation
7,469
Daps
136,075
Not with his sh*tty ass PPV sales lately :mjlol:

Anyway, that's what we get in exchange for him re-upping with Top Rank.


You beat me to it. Arum even admitted the numbers for Bradley/Pac II were disappointing, and with that said, one has to wonder why Algieri got the nod. The only thing I can think of is because he's the only one available via Top Rank/HBO. The Cold War appears to be coming to an end, especially in light of Hopkins and Kovalev reaching a deal to bang on HBO at that. Still, the cream of the crop from 140-147 is signed to Haymon, and there's nothing to indicate he's willing to deal with HBO, or maybe it's the other way around with HBO not wanting to work with him. After the Kellerman Ether, I'm under the impression HBO and Haymon aren't exactly willing to play nice. If that's the case, Manny really doesn't have many options.

On another note, since the homie brought up Thurman and Garcia not being willing to fight Manny by default of their decision to sign with Haymon, (which is ludicrous IMO) I have to wonder why was Broner barking loudly for a fight with Manny as he's a Haymon fighter too? That fight would surely do numbers at least on par with Bradley/Manny II, possibly better. Bob Arum shut down any thoughts of that happening real quick though and I wonder why? Is it because of Haymon?
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
You beat me to it. Arum even admitted the numbers for Bradley/Pac II were disappointing, and with that said, one has to wonder why Algieri got the nod. The only thing I can think of is because he's the only one available via Top Rank/HBO. The Cold War appears to be coming to an end, especially in light of Hopkins and Kovalev reaching a deal to bang on HBO at that. Still, the cream of the crop from 140-147 is signed to Haymon, and there's nothing to indicate he's willing to deal with HBO, or maybe it's the other way around with HBO not wanting to work with him. After the Kellerman Ether, I'm under the impression HBO and Haymon aren't exactly willing to play nice. If that's the case, Manny really doesn't have many options.

On another note, since the homie brought up Thurman and Garcia not being willing to fight Manny by default of their decision to sign with Haymon, (which is ludicrous IMO) I have to wonder why was Broner barking loudly for a fight with Manny as he's a Haymon fighter too? That fight would surely do numbers at least on par with Bradley/Manny II, possibly better. Bob Arum shut down any thoughts of that happening real quick though and I wonder why? Is it because of Haymon?


Nope...Haymon doesn't decide who AB fights as an end all, be all.

We fought Maidana against Haymon's wishes and would jump at the opportunity to fight Pacquiao like AB said. Arum didn't wanna make that fight though...he'd rather match Pacquiao with Rios and Algeri even though Broner is a much bigger draw than either of them:manny:
 

George's Dilemma

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
27,794
Reputation
7,469
Daps
136,075
Nope...Haymon doesn't decide who AB fights as an end all, be all.

We fought Maidana against Haymon's wishes and would jump at the opportunity to fight Pacquiao like AB said. Arum didn't wanna make that fight though...he'd rather match Pacquiao with Rios and Algeri even though Broner is a much bigger draw than either of them:manny:


You may have misunderstood me, when I asked was it Haymon, what I meant was is Haymon the reason Arum didn't want to make that fight happen? Also, is HBO not willing to do business with Haymon? I'm under the impression the answer is yes to both questions.
 
Top