Former UFC Fighter Believes Floyd/Manny Will Be The Last Real Big Boxing Fight

Mac Casper

@adonnis - pull up, there's refreshments
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
18,792
Reputation
-1,951
Daps
22,565
Reppin
Love
Back in the day kids had class, they'd stand toe to toe and fight with their fists. Winner would wear the same outfit from the fight to the party that night. Now they are going after take downs, ground and pounds - this is the epitome of winning a fight off of opportunism. Back in the day "he went for the take down cause he couldn't beat him toe to toe" it's like you were fighting dirty. It takes nothing to take someone down to the ground and jump on them throw a bunch of punches as if you're scared of them getting up

. . Don't believe me? Ever heard the expression kicking someone while they're down? Why did people let their opponent get up after they knocked them down? Because jumping on your opponent while they were down was considered dirty, it's cowardly like you're scared of them getting up. And I'm talking after school fights where they would shake hands after and usually end up becoming friends later. Obviously a street fight is different, then you immobilize your target the second you have a chance and end the fight as quickly as possible. But if you challenged someone to a fight to see who the better fighter was, you fought with class.

Why isn't wrestling a marquee sport? It's not fun to watch men grapple and roll around with each other? If a wrestler just threw a punch he'd be a disqualified. If a boxer just tried to take someone down and fight on the ground he'd be disqualified . . You have a b*stardization of real sports . . And we all like to see a fight so it works, but it's not boxing. Boxing may have it's up an downs but boxing is eternal - we now no longer wanna see the heavyweights like before, before the heavyweight division was the pinnacle of the sport. Now it could be said welterweight is the marquee division as you have faster, more agile fighters making for more exciting styles.
 
Last edited:

The Infamous

Superstar
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
12,205
Reputation
3,672
Daps
37,780
It's a fact, numbers back it up

MMA is in decline because it got boring
which is why they put Mcgregor to the forefront

but even his fights have very little entertainment factor

Wrestling matches ain't never been on TV or in big ass areans on PPV
because the shyt is boring to watch

same with judo, and all that other shyt

it's just a fact

boxing is the only event where you see A listers from all industries in attendance for a title fight

you no gonna see Tiger Woods, Denzel Washington, Will Smth, Jack Nicholson, Mark Whalburg at no UFC event

but they will be there at the same time for a boxing fight

it's just a fact,

Still not a fact.

Like you've said in the past, the UFC is definitly on it's deathbed:
UFC 182 - 800k buys
UFC 183- 600-700k buys
Conor McGregor Leads UFC and FOX Sports 1 to Record TV Ratings
*All from 2015.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/conor-mcgregor-leads-ufc-fox-sports-1-record-205042321--mma.html
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,666
Reppin
NULL
Still not a fact.

Like you've said in the past, the UFC is definitly on it's deathbed:
UFC 182 - 800k buys
UFC 183- 600-700k buys
Conor McGregor Leads UFC and FOX Sports 1 to Record TV Ratings
*All from 2015.

Nobody cares about Fox Sports 1

UFC doesn't report numbers, isn't that what you said

Silva is out of MMA, people watched that for him, and it wasn't really that entertainer

Jones V.s Cormier was the hypest UFC fight in a long time, it had a build up, and did Timothy Bradley numbers

their are no Mega Fights in MMA

MMA has no stars to take over Anderson Silva's

They trying to do it with Mcgregor, but how long it last, there's no one for him to fight
 

The Infamous

Superstar
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
12,205
Reputation
3,672
Daps
37,780
Back in the day kids had class, they'd stand toe to toe and fight with their fists. Winner would wear the same outfit from the fight to the party that night. Now they are going after take downs, ground and pounds - this is the epitome of winning a fight off of opportunism. Back in the day "he went for the take down cause he couldn't beat him toe to toe" it's like you were fighting dirty. It takes nothing to take someone down to the ground and jump on them throw a bunch of punches as if you're scared to get up

. . Don't believe me? Ever hard the expression kicking someone while they're down? Why did people let their opponent get up after they knocked them down? Because jumping on your opponent while they were down was considered dirty, it's cowardly like you're scared of them getting up. And I'm talking after school fights where they would shake hands after and usually end up becoming friends later. Obviously a street fight is different, then you immobilize your target the second you have a chance and end the fight as quickly as possible. But if you challenged someone to a fight to see who the better fighter was, you fought with class.

Why isn't wrestling a marquee sport? It's not fun to watch men grapple and roll around with each other? If a wrestler just threw a punch he'd be a disqualified. If a boxer just tried to take someone down and fight on the ground he'd be disqualified . . You have a b*stardization of real sports . . And we all like to see a fight so it works, but it's not boxing. Boxing may have it's up an downs but boxing is eternal - we now no longer wanna see the heavyweights like before, before the heavyweight division was the pinnacle of the sport. Now it could be said welterweight is the marquee division as you have faster, more agile fighters making for more exciting styles.

Wrestling along with running are the two oldest sports in human history.

You're so clueless it's actually pretty funny.
 

Mac Casper

@adonnis - pull up, there's refreshments
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
18,792
Reputation
-1,951
Daps
22,565
Reppin
Love
Wrestling along with running are the two oldest sports in human history.

You're so clueless it's actually pretty funny.
No. You're actually just a complete dumb ass because you can't connect the concepts and make an applicable response. Oldest sport wasn't even a part of the discussion . . I said wrestling is not a marquee spectator sport - major networks don't pick it up, nobody's buying pay per views, no major coverage and it's not broadcasted on major networks.

Would you like to continue proving your ineptitude?

Furthermore, you failed to understand that I mentioned MMA as a b*stardization of wrestling - which is a true sport, obviously I wouldn't make reference to the b*stardization of a sport that isn't respectable - to further clarify what I'm saying because you seem to be a but slow at understanding, MMA is a b*stardization of a few true sports .

A purist would say let them all be and have them compete in their own realm - hence why I'm calling it a b*stardization
 

Mac Casper

@adonnis - pull up, there's refreshments
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
18,792
Reputation
-1,951
Daps
22,565
Reppin
Love
Wrestling along with running are the two oldest sports in human history.

You're so clueless it's actually pretty funny.
No. You're actually just a complete dumb ass because you can't connect the concepts and make an applicable response. Oldest sport wasn't even a part of the discussion . . I said wrestling is not a marquee spectator sport - major networks don't pick it up, nobody's buying pay per views, no major coverage and it's not broadcasted on major networks.

Would you like to continue proving your ineptitude?

Furthermore, you failed to understand that I mentioned MMA as a b*stardization of wrestling - which is a true sport, obviously I wouldn't make reference to the b*stardization of a sport that isn't respectable - to further clarify what I'm saying because you seem to be a but slow at understanding, MMA is a b*stardization of a few true sports .

A purist would say let them all be and have them compete in their own realm - hence why I'm calling it a b*stardization
 

The Infamous

Superstar
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
12,205
Reputation
3,672
Daps
37,780
Nobody cares about Fox Sports 1

UFC doesn't report numbers, isn't that what you said

Silva is out of MMA, people watched that for him, and it wasn't really that entertainer

Jones V.s Cormier was the hypest UFC fight in a long time, it had a build up, and did Timothy Bradley numbers

their are no Mega Fights in MMA

MMA has no stars to take over Anderson Silva's

They trying to do it with Mcgregor, but how long it last, there's no one for him to fight

So 800k is Timothy Bradley numbers? If that was true he would be only fighting on PPV.

The earliest indications are that UFC 183 will fall short of UFC 182, with the Jon Jones vs. Daniel Cormier light heavyweight title fight, but will finish well ahead of every other show since UFC 168, likely falling between 600,000 and 700,000 buys. That would be one of the highest totals in company history for a show that didn't include a championship match. With two shows in the month, it will likely wind up as the third-most pay-per-views buys in a calender month for the UFC, trailing May and July 2010.

http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2015/2/5...a-major-success-with-high-tv-ratings-ppv-buys

As was expected with the buildup, UFC 182 was the most successful event for the company since UFC 168, with early cable estimates of the show headlined by Jon Jones vs. Daniel Cormier for the UFC light heavyweight title coming in at between 740,000 and 820,000 pay-per-view buys.

The number was more impressive given it went head-to-head with the Baltimore Ravens vs. Pittsburgh Steelers NFL playoff game that drew 28 million viewers, and both the NFL and UFC strongly hit the adult male demographic. Another key is that when UFC draws out of its usual range for a big fight, it is usually hitting the sports fan audience, so going against the NFL playoffs impacts the bigger shows more than the shows that draw the usual UFC pay-per-view base audience.

http://www.mmafighting.com/2015/1/1...does-ufcs-best-pay-per-view-numbers-in-a-year
 

Mac Casper

@adonnis - pull up, there's refreshments
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
18,792
Reputation
-1,951
Daps
22,565
Reppin
Love
Wrestling along with running are the two oldest sports in human history.

You're so clueless it's actually pretty funny.
No. You're actually just a complete dumb ass because you can't connect the concepts and make an applicable response. Oldest sport wasn't even a part of the discussion . . I said wrestling is not a marquee spectator sport - major networks don't pick it up, nobody's buying pay per views, no major coverage and it's not broadcasted on major networks.

Would you like to continue proving your ineptitude?

Furthermore, you failed to understand that I mentioned MMA as a b*stardization of wrestling - which is a true sport, obviously I wouldn't make reference to the b*stardization of a sport that isn't respectable - to further clarify what I'm saying because you seem to be a but slow at understanding, MMA is a b*stardization of a few true sports .

A purist would say let them all be and have them compete in their own realm - hence why I'm calling it a b*stardization
 

The Infamous

Superstar
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
12,205
Reputation
3,672
Daps
37,780
No. You're actually just a complete dumb ass because you can't connect the concepts and make an applicable response. Oldest sport wasn't even a part of the discussion . . I said wrestling is not a marquee spectator sport - major networks don't pick it up, nobody's buying pay per views, no major coverage and it's not broadcasted on major networks.

Would you like to continue proving your ineptitude?

Furthermore, you failed to understand that I mentioned MMA as a b*stardization of wrestling - which is a true sport, obviously I wouldn't make reference to the b*stardization of a sport that isn't respectable - to further clarify what I'm saying because you seem to be a but slow at understanding, MMA is a b*stardization of a few true sports .

A purist would say let them all be and have them compete in their own realm - hence why I'm calling it a b*stardization

No.

Re-read your posts you'll see why I made that point.
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,666
Reppin
NULL

Man you don't get

The was the biggest match up in MMA and only did bradley numbers


Boxing doesn't need to be on PPV to make money

it doesn't even need to be televised to make money other you don't understand boxing fans and how much money there is in he sport

boxing is the sport where the poor entertain the rich, it's a spectacle

just because espn and all this hack writers never knew much about doesn't change reality
 
Top