Former NBA star Gilbert Arenas says why date women when you can spend $250 dollars and get right to it.

[UNATTACHED]

I'm willing to hear your argument it cost neither

It's not really about the cost to me it's more about the return.

You pay a pro 250 and you just get mediocre condom sex and head from a bytch that's possibly had 1 or more other men inside her that day. That's not including the money for gas to get to the hotel and for the room itself.

Or, you take a lady that's actually attracted to you out to a restaurant you like, and then maybe do something active like mini golf and then you go back to her place and smash a couple times that night. Then yall wake up and do it again and then you head home. She was actually feeling you and didn't mention a condom so you rolled the dice and went raw. Let's say that night for comparison you end up spending 250 on gas, good food, and fun night talking shyt and laughing and 3 nuts. A couple days later you hit her up and she comes to your place and you technically don't spend a dime.

What would be the more satisfying experience?

I know the second scenario could lead to a relationship (and/or a baby if you're not careful) so someone that's not looking for that might not like that exact situation. But there's females out here that wouldn't mind a situation like that. If she's on bc then you won't have to worry about the baby.

That's because you think surface level. I'm not even advocating tricking. And you value money over your time.

Which tells me 2 things. How old you are and how you spend your time.

If you texting/calling women...dating...to eventually smash supposedly for free. How much time and money has that cost you?

It takes away from you working or running your business which costs money AND time. Time you can never get back.

But hey you smashed for free right?
Atleast I'm your mind you did.

I'm 32 and I explained more in the mini essay above but it's not about the cost it's the return on the "$250" and the actual experience.

Not dealing with women that don't like you would save all of the time men waste when trying to get some p*ssy

 

[The ADD]

It's not really about the cost to me it's more about the return.

You pay a pro 250 and you just get mediocre condom sex and head from a bytch that's possibly had 1 or more other men inside her that day. That's not including the money for gas to get to the hotel and for the room itself.

Or, you take a lady that's actually attracted to you out to a restaurant you like, and then maybe do something active like mini golf and then you go back to her place and smash a couple times that night. Then yall wake up and do it again and then you head home. She was actually feeling you and didn't mention a condom so you rolled the dice and went raw. Let's say that night for comparison you end up spending 250 on gas, good food, and fun night talking shyt and laughing and 3 nuts. A couple days later you hit her up and she comes to your place and you technically don't spend a dime.

What would be the more satisfying experience?

I know the second scenario could lead to a relationship (and/or a baby if you're not careful) so someone that's not looking for that might not like that exact situation. But there's females out here that wouldn't mind a situation like that. If she's on bc then you won't have to worry about the baby.


I'm 32 and I explained more in the mini essay above but it's not about the cost it's the return on the "$250" and the actual experience.

Not dealing with women that don't like you would save all of the time men waste when trying to get some p*ssy

You have to separate guys who wants more than sex from guys that do. If all you want is physical the dating is just extra time and resources.

 

[Balla]

It's not really about the cost to me it's more about the return.

You pay a pro 250 and you just get mediocre condom sex and head from a bytch that's possibly had 1 or more other men inside her that day. That's not including the money for gas to get to the hotel and for the room itself.

Or, you take a lady that's actually attracted to you out to a restaurant you like, and then maybe do something active like mini golf and then you go back to her place and smash a couple times that night. Then yall wake up and do it again and then you head home. She was actually feeling you and didn't mention a condom so you rolled the dice and went raw. Let's say that night for comparison you end up spending 250 on gas, good food, and fun night talking shyt and laughing and 3 nuts. A couple days later you hit her up and she comes to your place and you technically don't spend a dime.

What would be the more satisfying experience?

I know the second scenario could lead to a relationship (and/or a baby if you're not careful) so someone that's not looking for that might not like that exact situation. But there's females out here that wouldn't mind a situation like that. If she's on bc then you won't have to worry about the baby.


I'm 32 and I explained more in the mini essay above but it's not about the cost it's the return on the "$250" and the actual experience.

Not dealing with women that don't like you would save all of the time men waste when trying to get some p*ssy

You really can’t explain to people why not tricking is better because that’s how they just do things.

Same way you can’t explain to someone who doesn’t trick why it’s better to trick.

2 different ways people think that probably won’t change.

No one ever says you can do both, it’s either my way or the highway, so there’s really no way to prove to one person why one way is better than the other.

I’m not with that tricking shyt though.

 

[mag357]

It's not really about the cost to me it's more about the return.

You pay a pro 250 and you just get mediocre condom sex and head from a bytch that's possibly had 1 or more other men inside her that day. That's not including the money for gas to get to the hotel and for the room itself.

Or, you take a lady that's actually attracted to you out to a restaurant you like, and then maybe do something active like mini golf and then you go back to her place and smash a couple times that night. Then yall wake up and do it again and then you head home. She was actually feeling you and didn't mention a condom so you rolled the dice and went raw. Let's say that night for comparison you end up spending 250 on gas, good food, and fun night talking shyt and laughing and 3 nuts. A couple days later you hit her up and she comes to your place and you technically don't spend a dime.

What would be the more satisfying experience?

I know the second scenario could lead to a relationship (and/or a baby if you're not careful) so someone that's not looking for that might not like that exact situation. But there's females out here that wouldn't mind a situation like that. If she's on bc then you won't have to worry about the baby.


I'm 32 and I explained more in the mini essay above but it's not about the cost it's the return on the "$250" and the actual experience.

Not dealing with women that don't like you would save all of the time men waste when trying to get some p*ssy

Im reading the back and forth, good Convo. But you're not really making a good case.

Dudes is paying to fukk a chick to get a nutt and go home.
You're talking about texting, talking on the phone and spending money on dates.... which is alot of time and time is expensive.
All that, just hoping she likes you the same way. And hoping she lets you get some p*ssy.
Which could be mediocre.
And if she likes you, she'll give you more p*ssy, if you take her out on more dates and buy her shyt

 

[So-Chi]

It's not really about the cost to me it's more about the return.

You pay a pro 250 and you just get mediocre condom sex and head from a bytch that's possibly had 1 or more other men inside her that day. That's not including the money for gas to get to the hotel and for the room itself.

Or, you take a lady that's actually attracted to you out to a restaurant you like, and then maybe do something active like mini golf and then you go back to her place and smash a couple times that night. Then yall wake up and do it again and then you head home. She was actually feeling you and didn't mention a condom so you rolled the dice and went raw. Let's say that night for comparison you end up spending 250 on gas, good food, and fun night talking shyt and laughing and 3 nuts. A couple days later you hit her up and she comes to your place and you technically don't spend a dime.

What would be the more satisfying experience?

I know the second scenario could lead to a relationship (and/or a baby if you're not careful) so someone that's not looking for that might not like that exact situation. But there's females out here that wouldn't mind a situation like that. If she's on bc then you won't have to worry about the baby.


I'm 32 and I explained more in the mini essay above but it's not about the cost it's the return on the "$250" and the actual experience.

Not dealing with women that don't like you would save all of the time men waste when trying to get some p*ssy

Both situations are can go either way. You could pay for that dinner and she don't fukk or it's trash puss. Also, you definitely paid and used time, so it's still a risk scenario. Mind you, I'm not saying get a hooker... I am saying time or money will be spent regardless and it's all a risk

 

[Sniper]

How do nikkas have sex with women without mutual desire/attraction?

You think nikkas are attracted to their hands?

 

[Balla]

For the brehs, who trick.

Are y’all really tricking on every single chick you have sex with, Is that the only way y’all really get women?


I’m not seeing how paying $1000+ a month is cheaper or saves you so much time compared to taking a chick out to a cheap ass date or 2 and fukkin her without paying by the hour.

 

[The ADD]

For the brehs, who trick.

Are y’all really tricking on every single chick you have sex with, Is that the only way y’all really get women?


I’m not seeing how paying $1000+ a month is cheaper or saves you so much time compared to taking a chick out to a cheap ass date or 2 and fukkin her without paying by the hour.

I would imagine some can’t women to go on a date.

 

[Balla]

I would imagine some can’t women to go on a date.

Most likely because when you hear things about dudes paying for escorts. You really gotta think, do they ever try to get non-escort women at all?

I couldn’t imagine only messing with escorts.

To me, it should honestly be something you do here and there if you do do it.

 

[The ADD]

Most likely because when you hear things about dudes paying for escorts. You really gotta think, do they ever try to get non-escort women at all?

I couldn’t imagine only messing with escorts.

To me, it should honestly be something you do here and there if you do do it.

I mean they don’t have to. Everybody gotta do what’s best for them.

There was a poster the other day that said something to the effect that all women were whores and looking to monetize themselves. If you have that prospective, prostitution make sense.

 

[feelosofer]

I respect his honesty.

 

[NoirDynosaur]

I Have zero problems if a man wants to trick. Some men have absolutely zero game. Prostitution should be made legal. This fallacy that it funds human trafficking is BS.

If a Breh wants to get stimulated while stimulating the economy, then let two consenting adults do so. These Nissan Altimas aren’t going to pay for themselves.

But this idea that it’s a better alternative than being married or in a long term relationship is complete nonsense. “Oh you pay for it one way or another.” That comes from someone that has never been in a healthy relationship.

More proof that most athletes are just lames with money. Jeter and Kaepernick gave everyone the blueprint and these clowns are still messing up.

80% of Women are attracted to 20% of Men.

20% of these men have what women are attracted too 1.) Looks 2.) Status 3.) Charm 4. Money 5.) Style

Looks and Sex Appeal is the main indicator of physical attraction. If a man is physically attractive, getting a woman of that caliber is accessible

Status plays a role. Women are attracted to men with power. Online and real life. If a man has a lot of influence such as having a lot of followers, fans, contributes to society, that's going to attract an abundance of women. Comedians, Rappers, Singers, Dancers, Artists, Business men, etc

Charisma is underrated. Charm doesn't require money. Charm is how you make someone feel. Making a woman feel some type of way builds an attachment. As soon as attachment is built, the attraction is maintained.


Money. Money is a tool used to achieve resources most won't normally achieve. It's true that money cannot replace lack of confidence, lack of self esteem lack of swag and corny ness.

A man whose moves wisely with money is different from a man who moves slopy with money.

Look at Passport Pros. Passport pros want the validation of getting a "baddie" they end up tricking. A man whose used to bagging baddies doesn't need to do extra shyt to confirm himself.

Style and Swag comes last. The way a man presents his style and fashion choices plays a role. How a man carries himself and treats himself plays a role how women perceive him.

At the end of the day, how you start is how you finish.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

80% of Women are attracted to 20% of Men.

20% of these men have what women are attracted too 1.) Looks 2.) Status 3.) Charm 4. Money 5.) Style

Looks and Sex Appeal is the main indicator of physical attraction. If a man is physically attractive, getting a woman of that caliber is accessible

Status plays a role. Women are attracted to men with power. Online and real life. If a man has a lot of influence such as having a lot of followers, fans, contributes to society, that's going to attract an abundance of women. Comedians, Rappers, Singers, Dancers, Artists, Business men, etc

Charisma is underrated. Charm doesn't require money. Charm is how you make someone feel. Making a woman feel some type of way builds an attachment. As soon as attachment is built, the attraction is maintained.


Money. Money is a tool used to achieve resources most won't normally achieve. It's true that money cannot replace lack of confidence, lack of self esteem lack of swag and corny ness.

A man whose moves wisely with money is different from a man who moves slopy with money.

Look at Passport Pros. Passport pros want the validation of getting a "baddie" they end up tricking. A man whose used to bagging baddies doesn't need to do extra shyt to confirm himself.

Style and Swag comes last. The way a man presents his style and fashion choices plays a role. How a man carries himself and treats himself plays a role how women perceive him.

At the end of the day, how you start is how you finish.

This is not a real thing…. It’s more than likely based off of hook up sites… Also, define attraction

 

[HiphopRelated]

That works for Gil because of his resources. They asked why isn't HE married, not his thoughts on marriage in general. Nobody is asking Joe at Home Depot for multiple fine dining meals and Trips to the South of France. So only 7 figure coli brehs need apply

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Nobody is asking Joe at Home Depot for multiple fine dining meals and Trips to the South of France.

They are asking Joe for something that is relative Joe’s income/lifestyle… Pretty
much same difference