pawdalaw
Superstar
Why do you constantly use stats incorporating everybody in the team and not just Smith/Jennings? We're not talking about the rest of players, we're talking about how much of a bid fit Smith/Jennings are.
because this is a team sport. and teams win games not individuals.
You can use stats to make 90% of players look better than they actually are. You have such a pigeon-hold look on the game. You don't watch shyt, because you'd never say Dre is better than Horford, Sanders played exceptionally well with Jennings etc etc if you did.
Sanders broke out while playing with Jennings. Individual stats will speak about a players ability team stats speak about a team. Look at the stats of Miami and tell me that it had nothing to do with their consecutive titles.
Outside of your team you clearly have no perspective of what goes on in the league. When it comes to Your team, You are so emotional about it that You spend a considerable amount of time in another teams thread bashing a player that gave Yall an identity when You had none.
How many times have I posted Jennings and Smith shooting percentages this season and over their careers? You've got a bad memory. You sound like a 12-year-old with these hang up stats stance you keep projecting. But-bu-bu-bu-t the stats say this ass nikka.
I don't recall any, Quote them if You can, Even still it is not the offense. You can't seem to let that go. No team that ranks 28th defensively will win consistently.
What circumstances? Once again you sound like you've never watched Smith before.
Playing the most minutes of the whole team on a back to back,Returning home for the first time, being booed etc. in a place that You used to call home. If You watch games You should know that in those situations its common for players to either "go off" or stink up the gym. It happens often.
He leads the league in FG% because he only takes 9 shots a game and most of them are at the rim. ol' the game is ABC ass nikka. Honestly how stupid are you that you think leading the league on FG% with 9 shots with the majority at the rim is evidence for being better than one of the best big men in the league (Horford)?
And? Ignore the rebounds, ignore the efficiency You cant knock Josh and BJ for efficiency and then say it doesn't matter when comparing Dre And Al. I've already posted stats where their #s are very similar.
Hordford is a better shooter, post player, passer, defender - literally just about anything. Dre is no where near the player Horford is at the moment.
Only stupid ass homers would say Dre is better than Horford. Do Your research and Homework. because only stupid ass homers would take Al over Dre at this point in Their career.
The fact that you think this has any relevance to any of this is mind-boggling.
and You keep posting nothing but emotion which has very little relevance to the discussion at hand.