My dude If it was only posted a week ago...why can't you reproduce the post? This thread ain't doing numbers like that and I've gone back a whole month in this thread with no link stating what you said...all I found was you agreeing with another dude who was on some father's uncles brother at the told me shyt...Breh, you're gonna wait until a week later AFTER I posted about the 60/40 that to ask me to provide you a "credible source", ignoring the fact that I already said that it came from both Dan Rafael and Steve Kim?
Check their twitter feed breh, I dont have time for that anymore. It's way to many tweets to read through over a week later since it was 1st posted, plus Im done discussing this "fight" now. The ball is in Floyd's court and he better make the correct play....sign the contract
I ask for proof from credible source that you claimed was posted a week ago... and you quote yourself...
Not doubting you breh, you generally know your shyt but if Espinoza offered TR a contract for 65-35 and they haven't signed it, aren't THEY the hold up? Or am I missing something... I'm on my phoneIm at WORK my nikka
Like I said, you can go and scour Steve Kim's and Dan Rafael tweets and you will find it. I didnt post a tweet for that in here, but I referenced both of them right here:
That was a full week ago. You really want me to go out of my way, a week later, to do what you can do on your own? Nope.
Go to their tweets, and you will find it after you navigate the 200+ other tweets that they have posted since then...I dont have time for it.
Again, I find it hilarious that you wait a week later to ask for this, when you could've did this then and I would've just linked it for you. Call BS all you want, I call BS on Floyd actually wanting to take the fight
You missed the part where Floydie said he (Pac) aint getting thatNot doubting you breh, you generally know your shyt but if Espinoza offered TR a contract for 65-35 and they haven't signed it, aren't THEY the hold up? Or am I missing something... I'm on my phone
but you have time to type the same posts multiple times...
Not doubting you breh, you generally know your shyt but if Espinoza offered TR a contract for 65-35 and they haven't signed it, aren't THEY the hold up? Or am I missing something... I'm on my phone
but you have time to type the same posts multiple times...
You quoted yourself interpreting something supposedly Steve Kim and Dan Rafael said a week ago, you never posted any links to these actual tweets...You said those links were in this thread and they clearly aren't hence why neither I or you have been able to find them...I gave you a pass, I asked nicely multiple times to please provide a link and you come back quoting yourself...
Your post was made on the 22nd, I went back to the 19th on both Steve and Dan's twitters and there are no tweets evenly remotely validating your claim of Arum willing to accept 60/40 on either one of their twitters...I saw multiple tweets mentioning video rights and from Steve Kim shytting on Floyd but the math you keep claiming was never mentioned...What I'm assuming you did is read some pactards response to one of those tweets...
I am going to ask this one last time...If i'm wrong or you think i'm liying...POST THE LINKS...
You don't need to post a long ass response repeating the same shyt...POST THE LINKS...
And thats what Espinoza claimed was offered $40 million 35% revenue... Floyd is saying "they not getting that".. How can Pac/Arum sign for something Floydie wont even agree to?
