Devilinurear
Veteran
A large body of water such as the ocean is always moving
Flat earthers prove the earth is curved by accident:mjlol:
- Thread starter hayesc0
- Start date
A large body of water such as the ocean is always moving
Feel free to post this proof whenever you are able
But I know you wont because I know you know I'll pick apart whatever you do post
For the record, I dont believe that YOURE lying about the shape of the earth. You dont have the power or resources to perpetuate that lie
I just believe that a lot of yall are intellectually lazy and choose a religious faith in a concept that yall dont understand
It's always sloshing
Its general form remains the same
On top of that, you can average out the Crest and trough to get an accurate depiction of the flatness of the sea
The term "sea level" exists for a reason
Because the "sea" is one of the most "level" things on this plane
Ok why is it bright outside at my grandma's house where i used to visit as a child, when i facetime her in evening but it's dark outside at my house over here on the east coast? I can clearly look in the sky and see no sun. where is her sunlight coming from?
Devilinurear
Veteran
The term sea level or mean sea level is different in different places because it is constantly moving
Precise determination of a "mean sea level" is difficult to achieve because of the many factors that affect sea level.[4] Instantaneous sea level varies quite a lot on several scales of time and space. This is because the sea is in constant motion, affected by the tides, wind, atmospheric pressure, local gravitational differences, temperature, salinity and so forth. The easiest way this may be calculated is by selecting a location and calculating the mean sea level at that point and use it as a datum. For example, a period of 19 years of hourly level observations may be averaged and used to determine the mean sea level at some measurement point.
There is no help for dumbass
Point to something then champyou're projectingtangible accomplishments hold weight; i can point to what they've accomplished
you've accomplished nothing, and have nothing to back up your words. sorry
Show me proof that the earth is an oblate spheroid spinning through nothing
Then explain why all "photos" of earth show a perfect sphere
Then find a science priest that can explain the contradictory motion of the sun that you admitted that you could not understand in the other flat earth thread
Again, why do y'all continually ask me to repeat myself over and over, even though y'all have shown over and over that even AFTER I respond in good faith, y'all continue to talk around my questions and insult me??
Smh none of this is correct
Theres a concept called "perspective" that you probably need to do some research on
This is how your eyesight works
Everything in your field of vision converges to a single point directly in front of you at a certain fixed distance. You supposedly being able to see the sun when its thousands of miles away, WAY past the convergence point for objects that are MUCH CLOSER to you does make any sense
The human eye can only see so far, that distance is <100 miles on average. On top of that, the atmoshephere itself at the ground level obstructs the view of objects that are a certain distance away
The circumference of the earth is 25,000 miles and the diameter is ~ 8000 miles across
Why you think you should be able to see the sun when its 1000+ miles away from you makes absolutely no sense, unless you can point to another object that you can see with your naked eye that's 1000+ miles away at ground level
And if the high powered cameras you speak of are still subject to "atmospheric refractions" then they are unfit and invalid scientific tools period and shouldnt be used for any scientific measuring since they are still inherently flawed
That also doesnt change the fact that the higher elevation you are, the less atmosphere you're looking through, the more stars you can see with your naked eye
Yet this principle supposedly randomly doesnt apply to cameras, instruments that are modeled after the human eye with enhanced magnification levels
In other words, the argument that the camera "cant see the stars" is invalid
ONCE AGAIN, what is so hard to understand about this post?
Why are y'all too lazy to actually read my posts for comprehension??
Stop quoting me with nonsense
You know better than to quote me or @ me or quote a post @ing me by now european
Incorrect
"Sea level" is, on average, the same everywhere, because water always seeks it's level
If the sea rises in one place, it has fallen in another place simultaneously, meaning the overall sea level is the same
photos show a sphere because the earth is a globePoint to something then champ
Show me proof that the earth is an oblate spheroid spinning through nothing
Then explain why all "photos" of earth show a perfect sphere
Then find a science priest that can explain the contradictory motion of the sun that you admitted that you could not understand in the other flat earth thread
(CGI)Photos show a PERFECT sphere, even though your science priests have repeatedly stated that the earth is an OBLATE(IMPERFECT) SPHEROID, supposedly with a "NOTICEABLE BULGE" below the equatorphotos show a sphere because the earth is a globe
But I'm sure you'll just deflect again so your response is unnecessary
we dont notice those in harlem
