and thats the point, lol
whoever says that is insane. Thats why I laughed at it.
This what you gotta understand about me and my agendas, dogg: I fight stupid with stupid. I HATE the ring argument. Always have. I think most of the criteria people use in sports debates are stupid. So, when one of my personal favorites gets the upperhand over a "rival" I'm gon cyse it, no matter how small or stupid it is. Because that what all of this is about...personal favorites. There are OBJECTIVE measurements people will happily ignore to point out some trivial shyt that puts their personal faves in a better light.
Don't let Brandon Ingram average 20+ this year, because I'm going to loudly wonder why Giannis wasn't producing like that when he was 20.
"Hey Y'all...Why Giannis only put up 13ppg when he was 20 and BI just turned 20 and already dropping 20ppg. Ain't that curious. Anyone wanna talk about it?"
And I wouldn't even go like that if nyggas didn't shyt on BI immediately, while recognizing Giannis potential and waiting 3 years for him to start reaching it. Nygga put up 6ppg his rookie years and nyggas was like "Just wait and see...gotta give him time." But, BI 6-10 and a buck eighty and same nyggas "He sorry."
The whole agenda gimmick is meant to make fun of sports fans. I've just taken it into other areas as well.