Fines Against Single Mothers Planned in Chinese City

nalej

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
8,831
Reputation
715
Daps
13,908
Reppin
Seatown
I like the "ONE CHILD" restriction/limit they have on couples tho. I think we need that here. Too many mfos here have children and let them run wild with no discipline or effort to "RAISE" them into citizens suitable for society. If you only have one you take better care and put more effort into it

Our country is basically the reverse of this. We give you more money when you have more kids (ie. welfare, ebt, etc)
 

intruder

SOHH Class of 2003 and CASUAL sports fan
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
30,359
Reputation
4,475
Daps
58,085
Reppin
Love
Our country is basically the reverse of this. We give you more money when you have more kids (ie. welfare, ebt, etc)

But see welfare should be a backup support system. Not a default "here take care of your kids" fund.

Personally i think the welfare system should be a loan system where you are expected to pay back some of it eventually. Even if it's 10% of what you were given.

And it should be harder when it comes to who qualifies. I know mofos making good money getting $800 a month in food stamps. The sonOfAbytch pushing Lexus trucks and talking shyt but getting paid under the table and applies for welfare to feed his 4 kids
 

TLR Is Mental Poison

The Coli Is Not For You
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
46,178
Reputation
7,463
Daps
105,782
Reppin
The Opposite Of Elliott Wilson's Mohawk
The fine should be for the woman only .

She is the only one who makes the decision on whether to keep the baby or not after she finds out she is pregnant.

If she knows the baby daddy is a deadbeat lowlife and still keeps the baby anyway, it's her fault.
:50holmes:
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,825
Daps
43,534
This will only increase abortions, which will further benefit the politically connected elite in the country.
 

TooLazyToMakeUp1

LWO suicide bomber
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
24,849
Reputation
8,740
Daps
96,251
Reppin
Out here in my damn drawls
If this happens in America, how the hell is a single mother going to have money to raise the child, and pay the fine when she's probably receiving government benefits for the child as an infant? :why:

Where is the money going to come from and what's gonna happen if she doesn't pay fine; Are they going to lock her up, and have the child raised by the state? :heh:

If they fine the broad, then what happens to the deadbeat who's not contributing to the child's life financially?

Just seems half baked to me, but :shrug2:
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
148,327
Reputation
26,479
Daps
498,519
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
The fine should be for the woman only .

She is the only one who makes the decision on whether to keep the baby or not after she finds out she is pregnant.

If she knows the baby daddy is a deadbeat lowlife and still keeps the baby anyway, it's her fault.

What if the baby dadies skates out after the fact? :mjpls:
 

devizelle

Pro
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
852
Reputation
150
Daps
2,139
Reppin
MOCO awl day
Have any of yall studied "welfare" (now TANF)? This whole myth of the welfare queen should really be done at this point. Like welfare reform happened in 1996. Family incomes of those on poverty tend to hover around the poverty line.

Anecdotes about random friends of yours who are making "good money" on welfare are in DIRECT CONFLICT with EXTENSIVE DATA. Simply put, they're not representative of the norm.

Now, back to the topic--I don't know how effective fining out of parents of out of wedlock children would be but, more likely than not, it would just lower the incomes of these families; making it so that they are able to provide even fewer opportunities for their children.
 
Top