Take It In Blood
Banned
Link me, I feel like laughingNo sympathy
We told you bout posting on that garbage ass forum win
That Dave Chappelle thread is a god damn mess btw
:denzelcuttingup:
Link me, I feel like laughingNo sympathy
We told you bout posting on that garbage ass forum win
That Dave Chappelle thread is a god damn mess btw
:denzelcuttingup:
I don’t understand?
Should you not call out someone who committ sexual assault cause they may be mentally unstable?
You aren't responsible for what they did. You are responsible for your own actions. If you go out on social media and make a post for the specific purpose of damaging someone you are responsible for that.
So which is it does everybody that ever does wrong deserve to always be wronged in return or don't they?
And why were you posting on Resetera in the first place?
And why were you posting on Resetera in the first place?
It’s not about the abused woman. It’s about the internet mob that follows.Yeah @winb83 talking straight bullshyt in this case. Nothing wrong whatsoever with what the abused woman said.
Its probably the woat forum of all time.
So they did u a favor
A sensitive fake PC echo chamber of trannies who probably can't stand the new Dave Chappelle special
With that said TheColi is an echo chamber also, we're just less faggy about stuff (and I honestly don't even mean to use that word in a disrespectful way to gays, because they're cool with me and I'm not homophobic/I believe in all human rights but I can't think of another way to describe how ResetEra behaves)
No I'm saying context matters.You’re basically saying all bad behavior should be excused because it makes you a bad person for calling it out
This dumb. You shouldn’t have been banned but your thinking is faulty and just lets people go unchecked as long as they pretend they never committed atrocities
Sexually assaulting someone isn’t a mistakeNo I'm saying context matters.
I'm also suggesting that people are redeemable and maybe everyone shouldn't always be held to the bad things they've done if there's been genuine change.
Human beings make mistakes and there is a difference between someone that did something wrong, regrets it, then becomes a better person that doesn't wrong people and somebody that does something wrong and doesn't regret it and doesn't change. If we're "canceling" the former type person it's not so they don't go unchecked it's simply an act of revenge. They hurt you so you'll hurt them. That cycle is not helpful because it's the sort of cycle where victims turn into aggressors.
Or maybe I'm mistaken and your argument is weaponizing an internet mob against them in an attempt to ruin their life even when they have changed is somehow an attempt to make the world a better place and it isn't about the attempt to ruin them in response to past transgressions.