dope..
but imma be honnest.. i find the knockoffs to be just as good sounding..
like Art Pro Channel instead of Avalon... 400$
i used to have high end gear too...sold them.. bought low end gear....my only beef is my mic but sound almost the same..
old equipment was around 5000$ new equipment. 1200$...
I disagree highly that an Art Pro sounds just as good as an Avalon.
I can tell you that audio quality has a ton of variables involved though.
Putting a garbage microphone through an avalon is not going to make it sound like a $3,000 nueman u87i.
There are a lot of things to consider such as mic quality, mic placement, vacuum tubes, acoustic treatment, speaker placement, speaker quality, D/A converters, etc.
I've had behringer, art pro, UA, and avalon preamps in my studio and I can tell you the difference between the behringer and the art pro vs the avalon and the UA is night and day.
It isn't even a fair comparison, especially with an engineer that knows how to actually use the equipment.
If you are using different equipment and genuinely feel you are getting the same quality I would question your "ear" for sound and your speakers and listening environment. There's no way that you should be using an Art Pro and an Avalon and not be able to hear the difference. Not trying to talk down to you at all. Just saying something is up if you aren't hearing the difference. I know when I started to get my feet wet with mixing I first had to be taught how to "hear". For the longest time I literally couldn't hear anything the engineers were talking about. With enough practice I started to pick up on different frequencies and nuances in sound.