This is being looked at as she won her argument and it’s not. Netflix told the judge:
Netflix: Yo’ judge, this bih crazy...let’s not waste the court’s time arguing this dumb shyt...just throw this case out.
Judge: Nah, this will go to trial and we’ll hear both sides.
That’s all this is so I don’t know why people acting vindicated for saying Monique was discriminated against. They haven’t discussed the merits of her argument, just the right for it to be heard.
the article is misleading and written by someone who doesn’t understand the federal court system. They now get to move to discovery, which I think kills the case at summary judgment stage.
The depositions aren’t going to go well.
Mo’s Lawyer: Netflix, why didn’t you offer Mo’Nique more money?
Netflix: She won an Oscar in 2009 and hasn’t really done much since. No $100 million dollar movies, no sold out touring, no other specials. In fact the numbers we have for her specials that are already on Netflix are low. She also had no other competing offers....
Mo’s Lawyer: but you have that unfunny woman with no Oscar $13 million, why?
Netflix: Tangible history. Successful show on Comedy Central, highly rated special on HBO about a year prior, sold out Madison square garden twice, sold out a global stadium tour as the main act, and had a $100 million dollar movie against a low budget. She’s not similarly situated to Mo’Nique.
Mo’s Lawyer: what do all those numbers have to do with why she got more money. Mo is a legend, with an Oscar.
Netflix: How come she ain’t got no other offers, from other companies. Surely if she was in demand and wanted to reasonably negotiate, someone would have offered her more money. Do you have those offers so we can compare
mo’s lawyer: she’s a legend though