just one of one million robot themed cartoons to have come out back then
the flows was phenomenal tho
Everything I've heard would indicate that the studio will move forward with a "Fantastic Four" sequel. It may not make that original 2017 date, but they're definitely planning to make it. The next filmmaker in is going to start from a difficult position, and they're going to have to work hard to create their own movie while starting with some of Trank's choices intact. For better or worse, Trank was given room to define these characters, and his signature will remain on the next film no matter who writes and directs it. The next movie will be a reaction to this one. What remains to be seen is whether or not this incident overall will test Fox's resolve to try to support their filmmakers. It would be understandable if they suddenly reverted to the way things used to be, when you did what Fox said or they would just steamroll you.
Jim and Eric on the woeful debut of the reboot and what this means for the property going forward.
At this point Marvel doesn't need FF or X-Men for that matter. It's not so much the character than the actor that portrays that character and the overall story. Tony Stark will always be synonymous with Robert Downey Jr. Nobody at this point remembers Chris Evans as the Human Torch. He will forever be Captain America. And that's why RDJ is making 20 mili a flick.
As you can see with DC, Sony and Fox, movies get rebooted often and new actors portray the same characters. The ONLY characters Fox got right were Wolverine (and milked him to death), Professor X, Magneto and I guess Mystique. I only mention these four because they have been able to overcome shytting scripts with dope acting.
Yeah, I think if you add X-Men to the MCU it gets too crowded and can be confusing. FF is just kind of dated. It would take a supreme character and story effort similar to Cap, Guardians and Antman to make them viable in the MCU as well.
Spiderman is all the needed to make there shyt complete.