breh.. i take it you haven't been in the movies section of the bluray forumcatch feelings over a movie brehs
nah, i haven't been to the forums of that website, i do have an account there though for them high res 1080 picsbreh.. i take it you haven't been in the movies section of the bluray forum
the interstellar thread was pretty crazy there
nah, i haven't been to the forums of that website, i do have an account there though for them high res 1080 pics
ima have to check it out, nolan stays making people mad tho
I'm not an overly critical person, but I point out one thing that bothered me and dudes have a conniption
I mean, I can't help it if it bothered me breh. I watched it, enjoyed the movie, and i could've looked past it but the fact that one clearly had a mans body (more muscular etc) and the bytch was fragile and frail but they were supposed to be the same person, it just bothered me. I'll say it again, its still an entertaining flick.Nah...I'm mad cool, but your question was why John Doe doesn't favor Jane Doe.... I got a pet peeve when nitpicks are made while dismissing the fact it was shown and explained in the movie. In other words, it's an irrelevant criticism being that they were supposed not favor each other due to the circumstances that happened virtually at the beginning of the film.
It's a ridiculous criticism. That's how I see it.
their body is what bothered me most, bytch was fragile and frail and hawke is a real man n/h@Sensitive Blake Griffin when his/her/it/? face gets burned off they received a full face replacement on some "Face/Off" shyt. Now, if you want to complain about their bodies being different but there's no reason for them to look the same, facially.
Fred.
their body is what bothered me most, bytch was fragile and frail and hawke is a real man n/h
their body is what bothered me most, bytch was fragile and frail and hawke is a real man n/h