Ethan Hawke - "Predestination" (Looper + Inception = :mindBlown:)

Cynic

Superstar
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
16,171
Reputation
2,289
Daps
34,950
Reppin
NULL
yeah shyt was not believable to me, they have completely different body, I mean one is a real man the other is a female actress. look at her when she wore a suit, she was skinny as fukk. so not only is the face COMPLETELY different, the bodies are different to, other than that the movie was cool and interesting
A movie about time travel and you want believability ? :russ:
 

DoubleClutch

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
16,699
Reputation
-2,190
Daps
30,211
Reppin
NULL
Just saw this and here’s the best/most clear explanation I could find, even though this has probably already been e

“The story of Jane is very simple. IN THE ORIGIN, she was Jane who is abandon by a man (not himself in the origin). She grow up and meet a guy (not John in the origin) get pregnant and his guy (not John) kidnap her baby. After she become John and John become an magazine editor. After Robenson take him (John) and he enter in time traavel the agency. His first job is to go to the future and try to change it. He meet 'the bad" Ethan Hawke (Himself in the future) and he lose his face. After that he become Ethan Hawke. And Ethan Hawke day by day become the "fizzle bomber". Robenson "the boss" go to the past and said to Ethan Hawke (who is not yet a fizzle bomber) to go in the past to change the future. Ethan Hawke meet John (himself) and both go to try change the future in the origin. But what this movie try to explain and why is appear complicated is that instead of changing the past or the future, Ethan Hawke redo "BY HIMSELF" EXACTLY HIS LIFE. He become the genitor of Jane, become the man who Jane love, and after killing the fizzle bomber (himself) and he will become again in the future the fizzle bomber he killed. THE FUTURE CAN'T BE CHANGE it's what the movie try to explain. And instead of changing that Ethan Hawke redo again and again (HIMSELF), without end the SAME THING. He will always be a fizzle bomber, He can't change the future and he will redo HIMSELF infinitely the same past.”

My only question is if Roberson is aware of the whole paradox and what Ethan is doing? If so why does he even try stopping the fizzle bomber or even any crime at all. It it’s all relative. And in this case he’d know it’s a loop or predestined.

Creating a time machine defeats the purpose of even using it to try to change the future.
 
  • Dap
Reactions: hex

Sterling Archer

Spider Mane
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
35,097
Reputation
10,918
Daps
172,195
Reppin
Chicago
Just saw this and here’s the best/most clear explanation I could find, even though this has probably already been e

“The story of Jane is very simple. IN THE ORIGIN, she was Jane who is abandon by a man (not himself in the origin). She grow up...
Fam I couldnt make it past this point. Your grammar was horrible. And I dont even be on that. :francis:
 

MenacingMonk

Tranquilo
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
61,747
Reputation
7,867
Daps
134,987
Reppin
West where the Sunsets
Holy shyt, what an overhyped whack ass film. :dead:

The singular man-woman angle was so fuxkin stupid and makes no sense, even for a time travel movie.

Looper was better, and I didn’t think much of it.
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
37,783
Reputation
3,474
Daps
104,063
Y’all made me save my $3.99 on Prime Video.
 
Top