Elon Musk has restored Donald Trump's Twitter Account

[Micky Mikey]

Typical response when someone knows they have the weaker argument logically but are just going off emotion.

Maybe its because I'm extremely knowledgeable and interested in the truth that what other people say never offends me. If it's false I simply refute their arguments. I think most people are just not knowledgeable enough to argue against what they find objectionable. So they respond with emotion like you did here and call for censorship.

Because I know I can refute any argument I find objectionable I'm never in my feelings about what other people say and call for them to be censored. Censorship is only championed by those who know they can't refute what the other side is saying.

If I go on Twitter and implicitly advocate a genocide or insurrection with millions of die hard followers, that's ok? As long as enough people "refute" my argument?

 

[Swagnificent]

If I go on Twitter and implicitly advocate a genocide or insurrection with millions of die hard followers, that's ok? As long as enough people "refute" my argument?

If you can't tell people why they shouldn't commit genocide then there's a problem with the people.

 

[LiveFromLondon]

Is the world gonna end

 

[Micky Mikey]

If you can't tell people why they shouldn't commit genocide then there's a problem with the people.

What does that even mean? People are dumb. And even dumber in large mobs. And when you have powerful people deliberately misleading hordes of dummies to cause mayhem I would think that would be more of problem. Wouldn't you agree? Wouldn't you agree that at some level moderation and regulation is important.
Lets not forget that thousands of people were whipped up on Twitter (and other platforms) to try and overthrow the government based on fraudulent claims by Trump.

Free speech absolutism doesn't work. On a much deeper level there is no system in which absolute freedom is allowed that won't end in chaos.

 

[Jekyll]

Typical response when someone knows they have the weaker argument logically but are just going off emotion.

Maybe its because I'm extremely knowledgeable and interested in the truth that what other people say never offends me. If it's false I simply refute their arguments. I think most people are just not knowledgeable enough to argue against what they find objectionable. So they respond with emotion like you did here and call for censorship.

Because I know I can refute any argument I find objectionable I'm never in my feelings about what other people say and call for them to be censored. Censorship is only championed by those who know they can't refute what the other side is saying.

No, who the fukk wants to debate a self righteous dweeb about some shyt he’s already made up his mind on? Its much easier to just tell you what everyone is thinking instead of dragging the thread down with more of your weak ass posts.

 

[Swagnificent]

What does that even mean? People are dumb. And even dumber in large mobs. And when you have powerful people deliberately misleading hordes of dummies to cause mayhem I would think that would be more of problem. Wouldn't you agree? Wouldn't you agree that at some level moderation and regulation is important.
Lets not forget that thousands of people were whipped up on Twitter (and other platforms) to try and overthrow the government based on fraudulent claims by Trump.

Free speech absolutism doesn't work. On a much deeper level there is no system in which absolute freedom is allowed that won't end in chaos.

Ask yourself why would people listen to someone advocating for violence? The issue typically isn't the person whose speech triggers violence but the underlying conditions within the country that leads people to commit said acts of violence.

For example, was it the speech of Hutu extremists that caused the Rwandan genocide in 1994 or was it the decades of pent up frustration and anger over the legacy left by the Belgiums that created deep seated hatred between the Hutus and Tutsis? If that history never occurred would extremist speech have any effect on the populous?

Stop blaming free speech for deeper seeded issues. The only reason extremist speech has any effect in galvanizing people to commit violence is because the anger already exists. All the extremist did was light the spark on a field that was gonna catch fire anyways. Solve the deeper seeded issues and you wouldn't have to worry about the speech.

 

[Busby]

Don’t know if the first one is real or not but

 

[Afro]

It's wild watching the "genius inventor you learned about in school was actually a thief and a moron" story play out in real time. Elon aint even make 20 years before exposing himself as a goof.

His own father came out and said he is an idiot. Also fat

 

[Afro]

Don’t know if the first one is real or not but

YO

God DAMN
Neither one of his daddies want em

 

[RamsayBolton]

Don’t know if the first one is real or not but

First one's fake... unfortunately

 

[BaggerofTea]

Musk is a fool, this will only make Trump angry and swear him off completely

 

[Pirius Black]

Are you trolling? This dude's thoughts were "fukk your votes I want to hold on to power"

You can't just claim something is incitement apriori. If it was incitement he would have been prosecuted.

Guy got impeached a 2nd time for Jan. 6th, which he incited from his twitter account. Unless you speaking on Kobe, your takes are straight ass cheeks JFC

 

[BushidoBrown]

he aint said shyt yet