Elizabeth Warren to Dropout of the Presidential race - NYTimes

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
5,980
Daps
132,648
Why is bringing up Elizabeth Warren lying about her race a bannable offense? Did that not happen?

She literally kicked off the campaign with Trump burying her for cultural appropriation and Warren herself digging deeper with the DNA test. It was national news and many voters first exposure to Elizabeth Warren.

Its hilarious how months later when people still dont trust her yall wonder why or blame bernie. But when anybody speaks of the taboo incident yall wanna call for bans or beg mods to censor people. :scust:
tenor.gif


fukk the Voldemort shyt, her campaign is over now its time to get real. That shyt happened. It hurt her bad. People remember.

She sprained her ankle out of the gate and shot herself in the foot to treat it. Its time to start being honest
Exactly. For a lot of casuals, Liz is “Oh the lady who pretended she was Indian”?

And people need to foh with this nonsense that it’s a “smear” or not fair game. She said the shyt... not anyone else.
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
5,980
Daps
132,648
imrs.php


Liar is the 1st word that comes to mind for Liz among independents:francis:

Calling her a racist is a reach I agree, but whether it was an innocent mistake or not it still happend and is not above ridicule:yeshrug:
Wow. And to think @King Kreole and the rest of the Liz stans told me I was full of shyt for months when I told them she has an authenticity problem with voters. :whistle:
 

JLova

Veteran
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
55,440
Reputation
3,689
Daps
165,253
Been saying from jump, I like Warren I just find she went too easy on Sanders until it was too late.
 

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
25,198
Reputation
8,405
Daps
133,112
Been saying from jump, I like Warren I just find she went too easy on Sanders until it was too late.
I was talking to a Liz supporter and I told them this was actually Liz's problem. I'm not a Sanders supporter who freaks out about candidates going after each other in a primary. Thats what its for. The problem for Liz is she needed from the start to come out and make the case that yes there are two progressives in this race with similar policies but here is why I'm the better choice. She has to fight 10x as hard though because Sanders had the established base but Sanders was her direct competition for votes mostly. She had to make herself stand out.
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
14,011
Reputation
4,343
Daps
40,070
:russ: She dropped out and y’all sticking the knife in her? She was a republican before the 90s and wasn’t even an election official. Last time I checked she was checking Biden in Congress and created the cfpb. Y’all just throwing lies out to suit your narratives.
Let these guys tell it Warren was Reagan's VP and puppetmaster of the Republican Party in the 70s and 80s instead of what she actually was, a random citizen who grew up in Oklahoma and didn't bother to change their party registration until they got actively involved in Washington policy-making.
 

Json

Superstar
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
12,032
Reputation
1,303
Daps
36,356
Reppin
Central VA
Exactly. For a lot of casuals, Liz is “Oh the lady who pretended she was Indian”?

And people need to foh with this nonsense that it’s a “smear” or not fair game. She said the shyt... not anyone else.
Remember when the Republicans ran the Reverend Wright card against Obama and he just went up the podium and addressed it? he didn’t lay it on someone else.

Bernie people addressed the Castro thing with whataboutism using Obama as a shield. I understand the nuance but the visual is him not talking like an adult about Americans relationship to Latin America and Cuba.Which probably would have squashed it.
 

Rice N Beans

Junior Hayley Stan
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
10,366
Reputation
1,371
Daps
21,284
Reppin
Chicago, IL
he's LOSING to biden fair and square :dead:

Do we instantly forget the party making it known they don't want Sanders, will do anything to stop Sanders, and blobbed nearly every other candidate in order to stop Sanders, while having key people attempting to shyt on the campaign. This is from most applicable angles like media or even the politicians themselves.

In what way is that party backing, or fair and square? It's a complete uphill battle.
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
37,987
Reputation
20,013
Daps
120,865
Let these guys tell it Warren was Reagan's VP and puppetmaster of the Republican Party in the 70s and 80s instead of what she actually was, a random citizen who grew up in Oklahoma and didn't bother to change their party registration until they got actively involved in Washington policy-making.
:russ:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
302,255
Reputation
-34,076
Daps
611,799
Reppin
The Deep State
:wow:

:bustback::bustback::bustback::bustback::bustback:

:pacspit:







Elizabeth Warren departs the presidential race disappointed: ‘I really thought we could do it’
By Jess Bidgood Globe Staff,Updated March 5, 2020, 11:05 p.m.
BBLCWHJC4VDIFMDIY7G5LCROBU.jpg

Elizabeth Warren with husband Bruce and dog Bailey by her side officially announced that she is ending her 2020 Presidential campaign outside her Cambridge residence.Barry Chin/Globe Staff
“I think I would have made a better president than either one of them, that’s why I was running,” Warren said in an interview. “I thought it was worth fighting for another approach.”

The progressive firebrand endured humbling moments during her year-long run, especially the slew of disappointing third-place finishes on Super Tuesday that included her home state. Her voice cracked with emotion when she spoke with reporters earlier in the day. But a few hours later, Warren seemed galvanized by a campaign that has left her convinced of the power and import of her ideas — and, despite the whirlwind of speculation outside her door, defiant at the notion that she might now be obligated to lend another candidate her support during the primary.

“Why would I owe anybody an endorsement?” she said. "Is that a question they asked everybody else who dropped out of this race?”


Her exit on Thursday morning, announced first in a call to her staff and then on the street outside her house, came amid a sudden winnowing in what was one of the most diverse presidential fields in history. That field is now limited to two white men in their late 70s who Warren said in the last days of her campaign could both fail to meet the moment, although she said Thursday that she will “wholeheartedly” support the eventual nominee.

It was unclear which candidate would benefit the most from Warren’s departure. According to polling done this week by Morning Consult, 43 percent of Warren supporters said Sanders was their second choice, while 36 percent said it was Biden.


From the start of her bid, Warren’s aggressive plans to reduce political corruption and pay attention to the long shadow of structural racism delighted many progressives, but she never made wide enough inroads with voters of color or working-class Democrats who might have propelled her to victory.

Hers was a meticulous campaign that sought to change the country and politics itself, one that showed a candidate could raise real money without exclusive fund-raisers and pushed many of her competitors to give their campaigns the kind of substance baked into hers.

And it all changed Warren, too.

“There’s just a hundred ways that I’m smarter and tougher now,” she said during the interview, in which she described the policy plans she is leaving behind as a road map she hopes any future president — Democrat or Republican — will carry forward.

“I have an even clearer sense now of the world we could build,” Warren said. “The pieces are far more real. And it makes losing this chance to lead our government to make those changes far more painful.”

The campaign’s beating heart was Warren herself, who used her up-from-the-bootstraps personal story and unyielding willingness to meet personally with voters to try to connect with an electorate that could never shake its doubts about whether she could win.

Warren’s exit has raised urgent new questions about the challenges for women and people of color seeking the highest office in the land.

“I’m disappointed. And I’m disappointed for all the little girls I did pinkie promises with. I’m disappointed for all the junior high debaters who believed that we could have a woman be president in 2020,” she said.

“I’m disappointed," she added, "because I really thought we could do it.”

The next few weeks seem destined to become an ideological battle over the future of the Democratic Party between Biden, who has the freshly consolidated support of the establishment and obvious momentum, and Sanders, the democratic socialist who has promised a revolution.

Elizabeth Warren suspends her campaign for President

Senator Warren explains her thoughts surrounding the end of her campaign.(Photo: Erin Clark/Globe Staff, Video: Handout)


From the start, Warren sought to be a bridge between those two factions in the Democratic Party, mirroring how her own life and political rise have spanned different worlds.

She was an Oklahoma-born commuter college graduate whose mother didn’t believe she should go to college who became a Harvard professor with an expertise in bankruptcy, one who switched her voter registration from Republican to Democrat in the 1990s when she came to believe government was putting the interests of corporations above regular families.

As a candidate, she was an insurgent liberal who tried to use phone calls and fund-raising for others to make inroads with the Democratic establishment, even as she proudly rejected some of its trappings.

And while she was ideologically aligned with Sanders, she wanted to build support on the left while also appealing to women who backed Hillary Clinton in 2016.

But on Thursday, Warren said she had misread the contours of a race that had a deeper divide between liberal and moderate voters than she ever wanted to believe. “The moment in time matters,” Warren said. “If it is the case that most people in America see only two lanes right now and they fought for one of those two lanes, then all the things that were within our control couldn’t quite break through that.”

She ultimately found herself without a lane when voters went to the polls, placing third in Iowa, fourth in New Hampshire and Nevada, and fifth in South Carolina. She failed to build winning coalitions even in liberal bastions like California and her home state of Massachusetts — a loss she downplayed when she spoke with reporters on Thursday.

“I am deeply grateful to the people of Massachusetts,” Warren said. “Back in 2012, they took a chance on someone who had never run for public office before. . . . They’re the reason I’m in this fight and they’re the reason I am able to stand here today.”

At the beginning of her campaign, Warren had low polling numbers and thin fund-raising, hobbled by the hangover from a widely panned DNA test she took to prove her claims of Indian ancestry. She rolled out her first major policy plan — a small tax on the wealthiest Americans — in January, and soon turned ideas to break up big tech companies and tax corporate profits at a higher rate into the fuel for her summer-long rise in the polls.

Over the course of the spring, “I have a plan for that” became an applause line and then a rallying cry — and she seemed to be a neat foil to an incumbent president who has never dwelled on the details. Her campaign focused on hiring organizers, especially in Iowa, envisioning a long brawl for the nomination, and they bet that their early investment on the ground would lift them above opponents who planned to spend gobs of money on television — an assumption that turned out ultimately to be incorrect.

Warren often told the story of her own upbringing, with voters listening in rapt silence as she described her family’s financial insecurity and her “twisty-turny” path from being a college dropout to a senator.

But it was never clear that Warren was able to get that story to resonate beyond the hyper-engaged voters who came to her campaign events.

And while she won wide praise from Black activists for speaking directly and thoughtfully about structural racism, she failed to draw enough supporters from voters of color when they went to the polls.


In the interview, Warren said that she was proud of her campaign’s strategy, but that it simply wasn’t right for the political moment.

“The big decisions were right. The team we built was right. Even if we’d improved some other things, I don’t think it would have changed the outcome,” she said. “This is just a different moment in time and I’m sorry that that’s the case.”

Warren said she made her decision to drop out Wednesday. She gathered all the information she could about the Super Tuesday results — “Where are we?” she asked. “Where are we relative to others?”

Holed up at home, she held a series of calls with her team and spoke with endorsers like former presidential candidate Julian Castro and California Representative Katie Porter. (She texted with Massachusetts Representative Ayanna Pressley, she said.)

“There were people who said stay in this through the debate, this is too volatile, this is moving too fast — a week ago nobody thought we’d be where we were today,” Warren said, describing those discussions.

“And there’s truth in that, but delegates are being decided in each of these races,” she said. “So I’m pretty clear it was the right thing to do.”

And as Wednesday wound down, Warren said, she and her husband, Bruce Mann, did something they did not have much time for while she was a presidential candidate: They started watching the 3½-hour movie “The Irishman.”






























 
Last edited:

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,166
Reputation
2,029
Daps
121,125
Do we instantly forget the party making it known they don't want Sanders, will do anything to stop Sanders, and blobbed nearly every other candidate in order to stop Sanders, while having key people attempting to shyt on the campaign. This is from most applicable angles like media or even the politicians themselves.

In what way is that party backing, or fair and square? It's a complete uphill battle.
People dropping out of the race and voting is fair game y'all gotta stop bytching and crying like some fukking females. People went out and voted and Sanders is losing face the facts.

One minute it's fukk the establishment they aint gonna stop us :pacspit:

Next it's

Man they did us dirty why they had to team up :mjcry:
 
Last edited:

Shogun

Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
25,377
Reputation
5,901
Daps
62,576
Reppin
Knicks
Do we instantly forget the party making it known they don't want Sanders, will do anything to stop Sanders, and blobbed nearly every other candidate in order to stop Sanders, while having key people attempting to shyt on the campaign. This is from most applicable angles like media or even the politicians themselves.

In what way is that party backing, or fair and square? It's a complete uphill battle.
Isn't Bernie campaigning against that party, though?
What did you expect? Them to invite in his "revolution" with open arms?
What kind of revolution would that be, exactly?

The tagline that made him relevant is the same thing that makes him impossible for the party to accept.
He made his bed...
 
Top