Perfectson
Banned
As a homeowner that's called property taxes. I and all other homeowners pay it annually. My home is the majority of my net worth and that's the same for most of the middle class. The wealthy pay property taxes on their homes and land holdings as well but that may not make up a majority of their net worth. They have large assets in form of stocks, bonds and various other forms of assets that are not taxed that make up the majority of their net worth. This law would basically have most people paying a similar percentage of their net worth in taxes.
That is the way I heard it explained that makes the most sense to me. I don't care what anyone else buys but I want certain policies to be implemented (M4A & GND) and those policies need to be paid for, according to the people that oppose them. A tax like this that has a precedent already and doesn't hurt anyone and could help a lot of people is a good way to do that.
Okay. Here's my counter .
1. As you mentioned everyone is fairly taxed on property so we agree here
2. Land is not owned, it leased, government can take it whenever they chose under imminent domain as we all know. So you're paying a tax for leasing.
3. Stock, bonds, and investments are taxed through dividends, capital gains, and interest taxes federally. So if this is an issue rich people are paying a fair tax on these similar to an average Joe.
4. Asset tax would then require some assessment of what you have in your possession like paintings and other possessions . After such appraisal is done is the way to assess a tax, so you're basically being taxed for having more than someone else. You could have inherited something or just amassed random things but youre being targeted just because you're rich. It doesn't make sense. When you bought items you're taxed why do we need a residual tax on these items ?