The point went over no ones head...your analogy was stupid. Here's an example of what you just did, to show you what you did here:
A white man executive produces an album of songs from a dead black jazz musician, of unrealeased songs for profit.
You: Wow a klan member might has well have did this.
Do you see why this doesn't work? X should not be doing Y does not equate to the polar opposite (for the sake of a paragraph i'll say that) of Y should not be doing Y
For the record I agree with you, but he had a point.
I clarified with the same line in the same paragraph. Drake had no business doing her record, likewise Puff would have no business doing Pac's. And to take his line together, again, Em had no business doing Pac's.
Em was a better fit but it's still the same output I rectified in that same post.