Drake Initiates Legal Action Against UMG

[Raquinotj]

Dot has a deal with Interscope who are under Warner

Why would UMG help out one of their biggest competitors and hurt one of their biggest cash cows

nikka Interscope ain’t been part of Warner for 29 years(1995), Interscope is owned by UMG google before you post non-sense. MCA later Known as UMG bought interscope in 1996.

Interscope Records - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[Hood Critic]

Dot probably isn't even looking to perform NLU.

 

[Theo Penn]

WHITEBOOOOOOOIIIIIII!!!!

 

[FunkDoc1112]

Drake stans talking about "Kbots" and "Bot like us" but it's a whole Drake bot spamming this thread

All I'm seeing is posts from an ignored poster, "vote napoleon" whatever they/them name is. Has to be, no way someone is posting so damn fast and at a high usage like that

And dude just posts relentlessly as if he's completely unaware of how stupid we think he is; like he really thinks he's going to sway our opinions when this has been going for 8 months now

 

[Piff Perkins]

The plot thickens

This is a sync agreement, nothing to do with bots or fake streams. It’s basically a licensing agreement and parameters for collecting royalties.

Drake’s lawsuit is bs that will be dismissed but I’d imagine both sides will be hurling stuff like this, betting on the public not knowing how music stuff works.

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

Where that falls flat is UMG didn’t ask him to partake in this battle.

Drake literally asked and begged for it. Then Drake would have to prove that motive for the allegation which doesn’t make sense even if trying to sway leverage. You don’t personally destroy your prime asset for someone who works with the subsidiary. That would be my argument if I represented UMG. What do UMG gain for destroying Drake? Contract negotiations ain’t going to cut it. It’s only been 6 months at that.

 

[Theo Penn]

Dot probably isn't even looking to perform NLU.

If he wasn’t, he is now.

 

[iliketurtles]

@iliketurtles L

When your false prophet gets exposed don't start to cope

 

[verbaltelekinesis]

Optics wise this looked INSANE, which is why I think that he has to have real proof to file this lawsuit. As soon as I read the thread title I said to myself there is a bigger play here.

Honestly. Kendrick is collateral damage here. This is about money plain and simple

 

[fact]

This is some straight up fakkit shyt, nothing else to be said, Drake is going out really really bad, see how fast everything can crumble when you try to be something you aren’t all the time, in Drakes case, he tried to be a pseudo “street” dude (like over a hundred mills, and bailing murderers out of jail, and surrounding himself with a bunch of “hitter fam” or whatever they call themselves in Toronto with that crazy weird slang. It would be one thing if if he grew up around these folks, and they were part of his journey, but Drake living out role play fantasy), when in reality he has had the machine behind him since early teens. That Meek shyt really had this guy thinking he was unstoppable, and he picked the wrong one. I think the main thing that did it was his inability to not target women, specifically Virginia and Whitney, lololol

 

[fact]

I'd imagine it's someone's alias.

It is unquestionably Naps, and he is even in here with his main, smh

 

[Busby]

either payola is illegal, or yall are cool with it if Drake is the target. You too @Busby Clear it up.

i swear to God Dogg. You’ve been on my dikk for the past few months. Go touch some ass you bytch ass nikka

 

[Big Boss]

wow

 

[iliketurtles]

His numbers arent botted people irl listen to drake

 

[ItWasWritten]

Did he forget that akademiks called his Spotify insider and admitted the streams were real ?