Dr. Disrespect Permabanned From Twitch??????

[MeachTheMonster]

No.

Nobody knew the details about why he was banned. It was kept quiet due to an NDA. When youtube found out why he was banned on twitch, they demonetized him. Stop capping for a pedo supporter

Well it depends on if they knew or not i guess.

But how does having a problem with youtube either way make somebody a pedo supporter? if anything he seems upset that youtube got to make some pedo money along the way.

I say fukk em all, Youtube profits off all types of nasty content

 

[Bboystyle]

Well it depends on if they knew or not i guess.

But how does having a problem with youtube either way make somebody a pedo supporter? if anything he seems upset that youtube got to make some pedo money along the way.

I say fukk em all, Youtube profits off all types of nasty content

His intial statement was "why did youtube demonetize him for something he didnt do while on their platform".

Nobody wants to give a predator a platform.

Winb out here ready to protest for dude

 

[Bboystyle]

I bet you he gets more money for the ex employees leaking this info as well.

 

[choc_cardigan]

I crossed a line by saying YouTube's actions in all this is wrong? What line have I crossed? I think you don't really understand my point. You're so fixated on Dr Disrespect who is a piece of shyt I'm not defending BTW ( same guy ran up on a kid in the bathroom with a camera or something to that effect) I'm not talking about what he did I'm talking about YouTube. None of this involved them.

Log off and seek help

 

[Adonai]

Why yall nikkas arguing so much about a treh loving pedo?

 

[Jmare007]

Please explain how it involves YouTube at all. It doesn’t. His advertising partners yeah they should drop him as he’s toxic to their brand. YouTube is just a site people upload content to. There are people with objectionable views and behavior right now uploading and monetizing content on YouTube. Suddenly they put their foot down over a guy who had incidents on another platform that didn’t involve them in the slightest?

YouTube harbors known white supremacist and gives them a platform. They harbored Sandy hook deniers. This isn’t them taking a stance it’s them trying to avoid any controversy on something they profited off of.

Youtube was a partner of him and they only demonetized his shyt, his account isn't banned and he can still post videos if he wants. So I ask again:

What do you want Youtube to do? Nothing? If that's the case, are you ok with dude getting a shyt load of money for his "comeback" after what he admitted to doing.

And I'm not ok with racists winning money. Does Youtube let them monetize their shyt? I'm not ok with that, are you?

 

[5n0man]

Yall reading comprehension is broke.

@winb83 isnt defending dude.

He’s saying youtube got to play both sides and people should be on their ass for that too.

He's trying to argue that companies shouldn't have the right to cut ties with anyone due to things said or done outside of their platform or property. Thats a very slippery slope. There's no evidence that youtube knew about any of this, everyone was under an NDA.

Nothing about this is new, morality clauses are included in contracts all the time.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

He's trying to argue that companies shouldn't have the right to cut ties with anyone due to things said or done outside of their platform or property. Thats a very slippery slope. There's no evidence that youtube knew about any of this, everyone was under an NDA.

Nothing about this is new, morality clauses are included in contracts all the time.

Not trying to speak for WinB but i don’t think he’s arguing that dude should still have a platform.

Seems like he was saying companies shouldn’t be able to profit off some shyt like this then throw their hands up and pretend to be appalled when shyt goes public.

I don’t know if youtube knew or not, but they surely knew something as the split with twitch was unprecedented and the pedo rumors where already swirling AND dude had a host of other controversies.

 

[winb83]

You really cant fathom why a company would not want to associate with a pedo?

What are you talking about? I specifically said they did it because they want to be seen as taking action against him because of his negative association. I also said their entire relationship with him was founded on the fact that he did what they've suspended his subscriptions for and that they're more than happy to keep all the proceeds they made off a business relationship founded from an event they now want to act like is punishable to them.

They could announce today that all the money they made in connection to him will be donated to a charity to help children. They haven't and they won't because the focus is entirely on him and they've taken just enough token action to seem like they care.

They could release a statement condemning his actions and do nothing else. His subs would revolt against him anyway so their token action doesn't carry much weight. They leaned on a falling tree and claimed to chop it down here.

 

[EzekelRAGE]

I don’t know if youtube knew or not, but they surely knew something as the split with twitch was unprecedented and the pedo rumors where already swirling AND dude had a host of other controversies.

They didnt know, which is why @winb83 's whole argument is bullshyt. No one knew exactly what happened except twitch, disrespect, and the minor.
Disrespect made it seem like he did nothing wrong and twitch was in the wrong because he kept shouting "I got a settlement". That signaled to other companies that Twitch may have been wrong. After seeing he got a settlement and twitch not saying anything about why he was banned(NDAs to protect victim or w/e) companies like the 49ers(brand ambassador), Turtle Beach(he got branded headphones), NBA2K(he featured in the game). Once the real reason came to surface and DD admitted to messaging a minor, they all severed their ties(2K gonna remove him next patch). Another reason why win's argument is bullshyt is because he singling out Youtube who didnt have a contract with DD him (they demonetized from a program anyone wiht 1k subs can be apart of) and not mentioning the other companies that had contracts. His argument about them giving money they made with DD to charity is just stupid and makes no sense.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

They didnt know, which is why @winb83 's whole argument is bullshyt. No one knew exactly what happened except twitch, disrespect, and the minor.
Disrespect made it seem like he did nothing wrong and twitch was in the wrong because he kept shouting "I got a settlement". That signaled to other companies that Twitch may have been wrong. After seeing he got a settlement and twitch not saying anything about why he was banned(NDAs to protect victim or w/e) companies like the 49ers(brand ambassador), Turtle Beach(he got branded headphones), NBA2K(he featured in the game). Once the real reason came to surface and DD admitted to messaging a minor, they all severed their ties. Another reason why win's argument is bullshyt is because he singling out Youtube who didnt have a contract with DD him (they demonetized from a program anyone wiht 1k subs can be apart of) and not mentioning the other companies that had contracts. His argument about them giving money they made with DD to charity is just stupid and makes no sense.

The pedo rumors were swirling and they knew he did SOMETHING to get dropped from twitch.

Some due diligence and they woulda knew not mess with him.

But they took the opportunity to make money off the situation.

Not sure why yall going so hard for youtube. They profit off all types of nasty shyt.

Same for all those companies. Ignorance isn’t an excuse imo. They hired dude, they should have some splaining to do and i don’t think the donate to charity idea is a bad thing. We let these companies get away with too much shyt then they blame the person who had the least power in the situation. Dude shouldn’t have been given a platform period

 

[Deafheaven]

The pedo rumors were swirling and they knew he did SOMETHING to get dropped from twitch.

Some due diligence and they woulda knew not mess with him.

But they took the opportunity to make money off the situation.

Not sure why yall going so hard for youtube. They profit off all types of nasty shyt.

Same for all those companies. Ignorance isn’t an excuse imo. They hired dude, they should have some splaining to do and i don’t think the donate to charity idea is a bad thing. We let these companies get away with too much shyt then they blame the person who had the least power in the situation. Dude shouldn’t have been given a platform period

My crodie. You are speaking in what ifs n hypotheticals rhe other gentleman detailed what actually happened. This isnt a stan wars troll thread so I have no ulterior motive to undermine you lol. Im just saying its really no reason to take yt to task over the actions of dr diddler if there was a NDA in place. Yt the lakers all them pc parts etc would have been complicit in allowing the diddler to keep eating and Id think it more likely no one except twitch knew than everyone was aware. Twitch really the ones who need to get a finger pointed at them if anything but at the end of the day its fukk the groomer first n foremost

 

[EzekelRAGE]

The pedo rumors were swirling and they knew he did SOMETHING to get dropped from twitch.

Some due diligence and they woulda knew not mess with him.

But they took the opportunity to make money off the situation.

Not sure why yall going so hard for youtube. They profit off all types of nasty shyt.

Same for all those companies. Ignorance isn’t an excuse imo. They hired dude, they should have some splaining to do and i don’t think the donate to charity idea is a bad thing. We let these companies get away with too much shyt then they blame the person who had the least power in the situation. Dude shouldn’t have been given a platform period

Rumors dont matter, him getting a settlement killed the pedo rumors. There is no amount of due diligence or investigation that wouldve changed anything at the time because no one was talking about what happened due to NDAs. The only one saying anything was DD saying he got a settlement. When that ex twitch employee spoke out(possibly breaking NDA), that is what shined a light on what really happened.

Yes the donating to charity is a stupid idea. That's like saying every music label should donate all their profits from working with R Kelly or Diddy. Or all proceeds from Weinstein movies should go to charity.

No one is going hard against youtube. Ppl are going hard against stupidity and what seems to be a poster upset about youtube not letting DD get money anymore.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

My crodie. You are speaking in what ifs n hypotheticals rhe other gentleman detailed what actually happened. This isnt a stan wars troll thread so I have no ulterior motive to undermine you lol. Im just saying its really no reason to take yt to task over the actions of dr diddler if there was a NDA in place. Yt the lakers all them pc parts etc would have been complicit in allowing the diddler to keep eating and Id think it more likely no one except twitch knew than everyone was aware. Twitch really the ones who need to get a finger pointed at them if anything but at the end of the day its fukk the groomer first n foremost

I’m saying i ain’t got no problem with people having smoke for all companies involved.

“I didn’t know” isn’t a get out of jail free card for an individual, it damn sure shouldn’t be for these large corporations that have all the power and resources. YT chose to advantage of the situation for their own gain. They could have chosen to not mess with a problematic individual in the first place. The pedo rumors didn’t just start last week. I’m positive youtube has some investigators and they knew about the rumors at the time. It just didn’t matter until it came public.

This is just like a police department hiring an officer that got fired elsewhere then protecting him. Then a tape comes out of him doing some foul shyt and they throw their hands up like they aren’t to blame for putting back on the streets.

fukk all that everyone involved with him should have to answer to some shyt.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Rumors dont matter, him getting a settlement killed the pedo rumors. There is no amount of due diligence or investigation that wouldve changed anything at the time because no one was talking about what happened due to NDAs. The only one saying anything was DD saying he got a settlement. When that ex twitch employee spoke out(possibly breaking NDA), that is what shined a light on what really happened.

Yes the donating to charity is a stupid idea. That's like saying every music label should donate all their profits from working with R Kelly or Diddy. Or all proceeds from Weinstein movies should go to charity.

No one is going hard against youtube. Ppl are going hard against stupidity and what seems to be a poster upset about youtube not letting DD get money anymore.

They are still only rumors now. The NDA is still in place. What’s changed is public perception.

It’s all about money for youtube and the other companies. If they thought keeping him on would make them more money, they would do it.

And i don’t know about “all profits” but yes those record labels should be taking some initiatives to help people in similar situations, or to prevent that kinda stuff from happening elsewhere.

The way we excuse huge corporations of culpability is nasty to me. Most times they have ALL the power and most of the benefit, yet we allow them to throw an individual under the bus then continue business as usual. Diddy or R.Kelly couldn’t exist without the backing of the labels, so yeah they SHOULD feel some responsibility for the nasty mess they unleashed on the world.