And I also want to add that just because we may not have all the answers, it doesn't give credibility to any alternative hypothesis. We can't "learn from each other" because one side doesn't have any demonstrable evidence for their claims -- only appeals to logical fallacies, and rehashed arguments. One side is trying to solve a mystery WITH a mystery. That's not how KNOWLEDGE works. We use what we already know to explain what we don't know. Otherwise, the supposed explanation doesn't have any explanatory power at all.