Donna Brazile: I Found ‘Proof’ That Hillary Rigged the Race Against Bernie

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
308,429
Reputation
-34,294
Daps
618,743
Reppin
The Deep State


NQc1BCO.gif




Gary-Coleman-wtf.gif


@GzUp @wire28 @Atlrocafella @Blessed Is the Man @ezrathegreat @Jello Biafra @humble forever @Darth Nubian @88m3 @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy!
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
308,429
Reputation
-34,294
Daps
618,743
Reppin
The Deep State


Donna Brazile Is Getting Called Out For Her Accusations Against Hillary Clinton

Donna Brazile Accuses Hillary Clinton of Rigging the 2016 Primary But Did She Get It Wrong?
A former Democratic Party chairwoman accused Hillary Clinton’s election campaign of taking control of the Democratic National Committee’s finances a year before the 2016 nomination, except she might have confused important dates in her accusation.

Donna Brazile, who became interim chairwoman in July 2016 after Florida Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz was forced out over the infamous Clinton email controversy on the eve of the party’s convention, published in Politico excerpts from her upcoming tell-all book Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns That Put Donald Trump in the White House.

In the excerpts she explains that she learned that the DNC had made a deal with the Clinton campaign in August 2015, letting them take control of the party’s finances in exchange for paying off the party’s debts. If this is true, that means the Clinton campaign was steering the party a year before it should have been, which is when Hillary received the party nomination in 2016.

“This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party’s integrity,” Brazile writes in the book due out next week. “As Hillary’s campaign gained momentum, she resolved the party’s debt and put it on a starvation diet. It had become dependent on her campaign for survival, for which she expected to wield control of its operations.”

The excerpt publication calls it a secret takeover by Hillary Clinton, painting it in a scandalous light. Brazile explains she made it her mission to discern if in fact the Clinton campaign had rigged the 2016 Democrat Party nomination, stealing it away from Bernie Sanders, as many accused them of doing.

“I kept asking the party lawyers and the DNC staff to show me the agreements that the party had made for sharing the money they raised, but there was a lot of shuffling of feet and looking the other way,” she writes. In the excerpt Brazile claims she found document proof, a Joint Fund-Raising Agreement between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund, and Hillary for America.

“The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.”

But now a Twitter post accuses Brazile of getting her years wrong, saying she is referring to a 2016 Joint Fund-Raising Agreement and not one from 2015 as she claims.

To read more, please continue to page 2.





According to the post, Brazile is citing the wrong document. She is in fact citing the 2016 Joint Fund-Raising Agreement, which was made after Clinton was nominated. The previous 2015 Joint Fund-Raising Agreement continues none of the points or accusations that Brazile makes in her excerpts.

In other words, Hillary Clinton did not in fact seize control of the Democrat party a year prior to receiving the nomination.

Even more so, it appears that both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton signed the same Joint Fund-Raising Agreement in 2015. He just didn’t use it.




The Politico publication of Brazile’s accusatory excerpts has inspired President Donald Trump to tweet for the Department of Justice to investigate Hillary Clinton, or as he puts it, “all of the dishonesty going on with Crooked Hillary & the Dems.”









The timing of Brazile’s accusations and Trump’s call to investigate his political opponents conveniently happens as special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives escalates.


Dear @donnabrazile – You need to produce a copy of the 2015 Joint Fundraising Agreement (JFA) that you're referring to here 1. pic.twitter.com/QtV6jZJuFT

— Walk Talk Dunk☕️ (@WalktheTalkBern) November 2, 2017



According to the post, Brazile is citing the wrong document. She is in fact citing the 2016 Joint Fund-Raising Agreement, which was made after Clinton was nominated. The previous 2015 Joint Fund-Raising Agreement continues none of the points or accusations that Brazile makes in her excerpts.

In other words, Hillary Clinton did not in fact seize control of the Democrat party a year prior to receiving the nomination.

Even more so, it appears that both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton signed the same Joint Fund-Raising Agreement in 2015. He just didn’t use it.

He also signed the same joint-fundraising agreement — he just didn't use it https://t.co/3S5CF02OM4 https://t.co/aonJIKb9ie

— Mark Murray (@mmurraypolitics) November 2, 2017

The Politico publication of Brazile’s accusatory excerpts has inspired President Donald Trump to tweet for the Department of Justice to investigate Hillary Clinton, or as he puts it, “all of the dishonesty going on with Crooked Hillary & the Dems.”

Everybody is asking why the Justice Department (and FBI) isn't looking into all of the dishonesty going on with Crooked Hillary & the Dems..

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 3, 2017

….People are angry. At some point the Justice Department, and the FBI, must do what is right and proper. The American public deserves it!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 3, 2017

The timing of Brazile’s accusations and Trump’s call to investigate his political opponents conveniently happens as special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives escalates.
 

Bleed The Freak

Superstar
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
11,567
Reputation
1,314
Daps
42,781
They could easily win Michigan, Pennsylvania, Florida and maybe North Carolina. All of which lean blue. Ohio, Wisconsin and Indiana wouldn't be needed.

No. They. Won't.

I don't take advise from people who said Tyrese going against The Rock was a good idea seriously.

7ff330990a7ef4cc8546d588b9703dc1--favorite-movie-quotes-funny-movie-quotes.jpg
 

Colilluminati

TAMRON HALL STAN
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
10,773
Reputation
2,499
Daps
24,183
Reppin
MiddleWest
Theres an election in 4 days. In a way, I'm not surprised considering how she ran the DNC in the first place. All of this is her fault. :wow:


Hopefully democrats will get bushes and people like you will lose your jobs . :wow:Then we can come to our senses and elect a real democrat.:blessed:
 
  • Dap
Reactions: Ill

Scoop

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
6,041
Reputation
-2,685
Daps
9,523
Reppin
Tampa, FL
They could easily win Michigan, Pennsylvania, Florida and maybe North Carolina. All of which lean blue. Ohio, Wisconsin and Indiana wouldn't be needed.

Huh?



Notice Donna's spin on that damage-control tweet. She's talking about the ballots not being rigged, she's not talking about the process.
 

Lord_Chief_Rocka

Superstar
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Messages
17,721
Reputation
1,480
Daps
50,041
I feel these people are living in la la land.

They refuse to admit the reality that the democrats have lost most states and most government position in this country.

They refuse to admit the reality that, despite myself supporting hillary clinton, lost to Trump for a reason. It wasn't ALL racism, even though that was definitely there. This can't explain those who supported Obama twice, supported Bernie, and then voted Trump. Some of it was Democrats own failings.


In fact, I think the underlying problem is they have learned helplessness. They can go rah rah rah but are afraid of solutions to right the ship and win and lack any solutions themselves. They think elections are crapshoots and up to the will of the gods and simply Trump being bad is enough for democrats to win instead of Democrats being proactive and making moves to actually win.
Meh.

These are not the voters they need to chase. The fact is that young voters, black folks, and other minorities didn't turnout for her.

Chasing working class cacs is a fool's errand
 
Top