This thread weird. We needing to make new genres of game to say shyt is a new IP?
It would be like if square Enix called every final fantasy game a “new ip”
Stop it.No, it would be like if square enix called every rpg they’ve ever made final fantasy, just because they’re all turn based and star protagonist with big swords
Stop it.
Final fantasy games are much more varied than Froms last couple games.
From just chides to pick a new name each time. But anyone being honest with themselves knows they are all part of the same series of games.
The gameplay is the same.Sekiro has far different traversal/movement, progression, items and stock weapons, no armor, linearity, combat, an actual plot with a real protagonist, and completely different setting and themes.
If thats not enough of a distinction for you then a lot of games aren’t new IPs
You get punished for playing Bloodborne like Dark Souls.
You can't play BB like Dark Souls. BB stripped out too many Souls mechanics for it to play like a true Souls game.
They even have a shield in Bloodborne as a joke weapon
BB is action game with RPG elements. Dark Souls is an RPG with action elements.
The gameplay is the same.
Just like final Fantasy games have all that “new” stuff but are still considered the same IP
The only thing similar about those games is the way the world is structured. Mechanically the games are vastly different.FromSoft literally just swap settings with the same ol' Souls gameplay and call it a day lol nEw Ip!!!!
bloodborne -victorian london
sekiro - feudal japan
elden ring - medieval europe...again
it's like saying each assassin's creed game is a new IP since they swap settings, and iterate on the gameplay about as much as the soulsborne games do