holidayinn21
:SmugMoneyMike:
well that's nice to hear. have a nice day fakkit.My role is reminding yo hoe ass the Grizzlies ain't shyt and you a cornball and a hater.
well that's nice to hear. have a nice day fakkit.My role is reminding yo hoe ass the Grizzlies ain't shyt and you a cornball and a hater.
Actually he didn't have a triple double in that game - two assists got taken off him.Giannis had a triple double in that game.The truth is the truth.
This is a terrible argument.The fact that people think a Warriors team with 1 title would beat an all-time great team like that 70 win Bulls team shows you how little respect people today have for earlier generations.
That Bulls team lost just 3 games during the entire playoffs.
Just straight disrespect and lack of basketball history.
It's disgusting.
And they just hide behind that tired "old guys hating" excuse.
If these 25-1 Warriors team win 70 and take the chip, yall can revisit the debate then.
Coming from a guy who just attacks peripheral points but never makes any arguments himself?This is a terrible argument.
Enjoy your evening cocksucker.well that's nice to hear. have a nice day fakkit.
How the fukk would you know when you only visit this side of the board occasionally?Coming from a guy who just attacks peripheral points but never makes any arguments himself?
I'm not terribly concerned with any of your opinions.
He really isn't, especially if we take into account (which this argument is all about) on how well both of them would defend this Warriors team. You could argue that Thompson is the best type of defender to limit the impact of this Warriors team. I mean did you see the Finals and how well he switched on guards/wings, trapped Curry - forcing him into making an errant pass or minimizing his options. shyt you could argue that Thompson was the most important piece on defense for the Cavs during that postseason run - especially in the Finals.
Folk just think all Thompson does is grab rebounds - dude is a helluva defender.
This thread is on Barkley's comments, which he made about this team THIS SEASON.
Don't forget TT killed GSW on the offensive glass and Rodman even at 34 was better than him in that area.And he still would have opportunities to do that. Rodman wouldn't keep him off the glass on every possession, when both of them were out there on the court. Rodman would certainly have the advantage on the boards, but Draymond would still be able to get his, just probably not as much as he's accustomed to.
Motherfukkers shot 64 free throwsPlease don't compare Draymomd to Barkley... Chuck put on two of the goat playoff performances I've ever seen as a kid
54 points & 14 rebounds vs the Bulls in the 1993 Finals, I believe game 3 or 4..
44 points and 25 rebounds vs the Sonics Game 7 WCF (93')
every past generation feels that they were superior to the current,..................its part of the ego of man
people foreget how up in arms rap fans were during the biggie, jayz bling bling era but now some people reflect fondly on that time
Honestly there isn't that much difference in their rebounding ability:Don't forget TT killed GSW on the offensive glass and Rodman even at 34 was better than him in that area.
Even with Draymond's improvement this year, I think you're overstating his offensive prowess. He's not Anthony Davis. I could be convinced he has a slight advantage on Rodman, but he's not going to dominate him on that end. Rodman still had to face Kemp, Barkley and a young Webber in those days, all with similar skillsets to Draymond.
Good point, but don't forget Bulls were playing at a much slower pace back then. Around 90 in the regular season in those years, I'm guessing even lower in the playoffs. Cavs were at 94 in the Finals.Honestly there isn't that much difference in their rebounding ability:
Thompson averaged 4.4 offensive rebounds in 36 minutes last postseason
Rodman averaged 5.4 offensive rebounds in 34 minutes in the 95/96 postseason
Rodman averaged 3.1 offensive rebounds in 28 minutes in the 96/97 postseason
Rodman averaged 4.7 offensive rebounds in 34 minutes in the 97/98 postseason
Like I mentioned earlier - it isn't as if Draymond is going to average 20 ppg against Rodman, but he'd definitely have his way with him.
Limiting his impact on boards directly impacts those other numbers though, limits his transitions points/assists.He isn't averaging 14 ppg, 8.8 rebounds and 7.1 assists for nothing this season - Rodman will limit his impact on the boards but that's about it.
I don't think its about "stopping" Dre necessarily. Dray had a pretty bad playoff when you look at."Like is Rodman going to stop him from shooting 3s? Is Rodman going to stop him from running on the fast break? Is Rodman going to stop him from running the offense? Is Rodman going to him from driving and finishing at the rim? Is Rodman going to stop him from driving and finding an open teammate?"
I think you're overvaluing Rodman's rebounding ability. If he only averages 4-5 offensive rebounds a game in a series - that's only 4-5 possessions he takes away from the Warriors as a whole. It isn't going to be as if every one of those rebounds he will be taking away from Draymond - it could be any Warriors player that's around the vicinity of the basket. Draymond will still have roughly the same opportunities he does every game to grab a board and run the fast break, and he still will have the opportunity to be close by when Ezeli/Bogut/Barnes grabs a rebound to then take a pass and run the floor. Rodman isn't going to stop that. Draymond will always have opportunities to initiate the fast break either from team rebounds or his own rebounds.Limiting his impact on boards directly impacts those other numbers though, limits his transitions points/assists.
Well see the problem with this is, in what situation are we talking about Rodman and Draymond facing off? Is is it RIGHT NOW? Is it during the playoffs? When? Even despite this being all hypothetical, it's a bit dishonest on your part if you're going to take Draymond at his worst when he's run down over the course of a season. With Barnes returning soon, his numbers will drop, but I don't see them dropping because he isn't capable of filling up the box score. He has a relentless motor and involves himself in pretty much every play (giving himself every opportunity to put up balanced stats across the board) - his playmaking and ability to take it to the rim are certainly noticeable improvements from last season. The confidence in his shooting too.I don't think its about "stopping" Dre necessarily. Dray had a pretty bad playoff when you look at.
12 8 and 4 on 38% shooting (25% from 3) against Memphis when I'm guessing Zach was on him? Didn't watch much of that series.
14 12 and 6 on 43% shooting (20% from 3) against the Rockets against the ghost of Josh Smith and Terrence Jones (figure Dwight was on him at times too.
13 8 and 5 in the Finals on 38% shooting (26% from 3) in the Finals against (Moz, TT and Bron).
Looks like he worn down at the end of the year. That's why I'm not sure his current line of 14 9 and 8 on 46% shooting/38% from 3 (all career highs) is sustainable.
TT is more capable of defending this Warriors team and 3-pt orientated offenses than the Bulls' version of Rodman. The Warriors don't really have a post scorer for Rodman to defend, so besides grabbing rebounds he will be near-worthless. He isn't circling around the perimeter with help defense like he did during his time in Detroit.At any rate while TT is a good/great? defender none of the other guys he faced in the previous 2 rounds are and I'm pretty sure none of them are as good as Rodman on the Bulls however past his prime he may have been.
I honestly don't know what Phil would do. It'd probably take him at least three games to work it out - in that time the Warriors might have built a series lead that the Bulls would have a hard time coming back from. You'd need an all-time great defensive performance from Pippen to be the stand-in defensive anchor for the Bulls to win though - Rodman isn't chasing around and trappin' perimeter players all game long. You'd have to take into account that Pippen would probably be too drained on defense to play a starring role on offense.It would be really interesting to see how Phil matched up with that lineup. Conceivably he could've gone Pip at the 5, and put Rodman on Iggy and concede the jump shot. That's pretty much what the Cavs did.
I know that sounds like a recipe for Iggy getting 30, but that's probably better than Steph and Klay going for 25 on wide open 3s.
I'm legit pissed I'll never see this matchup now.