Does Charles Barkley realize he was small?

Joined
May 14, 2015
Messages
1,200
Reputation
70
Daps
1,458
I agree with the guy that said Run-TMC era Warriors were better than Curry's Warrior team. Hell, I'll even go as far to say that Curry's Warriors aren't even better than Rick Barry, Jamal Wilkes, and Clifford Ray's Warrior teams. Clifford Ray and Jamal Wilkes alone would destroy Curry's front court. New school Warriors can't go small in the front court against Clifford Ray, because Ray will destroy Draymond Green in the post on defense. Prime Clifford Ray was like a 70s version of Ben Wallace.
 

I_Got_Da_Burna

Superstar
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
7,258
Reputation
996
Daps
28,806
Reppin
NULL
You're speaking like somebody that doesn't watch Cavs games or those mid/late 90s Bulls teams. This is just an example -


bruh....

Rodman was DPOTY twice and was an all-NBA first team defense selection 7 times

thompson hasn't even gotten ONE VOTE for an all defensive team, and I'm talking both first and second team. to compare the two...shyt why not compare glen robinson to jordan while you're at it
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,716
Reputation
8,798
Daps
226,000
Rodman was DPOTY twice and was an all-NBA first team defense selection 7 times
Rodman won those DPOY awards in 1990 and 1991 - where he created his defensive reputation by guarding most positions on the court. He wasn't the same defensively in Chicago. He wasn't guarding perimeter players and he spent most of his time crashing the glass, and developing into more of a post defender. He didn't have the lateral quickness or ability to chase Draymond off the 3-pt line (or anybody else for that matter) during his Chicago years.

As I said before, Draymond would have a harder time against the late 80s/early 90s version of Rodman. He'd have his way with the Chicago version of Rodman. Furthermore, Thompson is one of the best bigs at defending out on the perimeter, he's better than mid/late 90s Rodman in that department, and he's more familiar with dealing with 3-pt orientated offenses - whereas Rodman isn't.
thompson hasn't even gotten ONE VOTE for an all defensive team, and I'm talking both first and second team. to compare the two...shyt why not compare glen robinson to jordan while you're at it
See now, you don't know what the fukk you're talking about. You clearly have no knowledge of Rodman's defensive abilities in Chicago and are just regutatiting the same tired nostalgic bullshyt that's been said in this thread. Rodman was in his mid/late 30s in Chicago and no longer had the lateral quickness to defend wings/guards on switches or circle around the perimeter - Thompson has just entered his mid-20s and has superior lateral quickness.

Mid/late 90s Rodman wouldn't be able to do what Thompson did against the Warriors on the defensive end (hedging/trapping out on the perimeter, closing down driving lanes, switching on Curry/Klay/Iggy etc etc) - it's as simply as that.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,716
Reputation
8,798
Daps
226,000
I agree with the guy that said Run-TMC era Warriors were better than Curry's Warrior team. Hell, I'll even go as far to say that Curry's Warriors aren't even better than Rick Barry, Jamal Wilkes, and Clifford Ray's Warrior teams. Clifford Ray and Jamal Wilkes alone would destroy Curry's front court. New school Warriors can't go small in the front court against Clifford Ray, because Ray will destroy Draymond Green in the post on defense. Prime Clifford Ray was like a 70s version of Ben Wallace.
:merchant:
 

Gangstar8

Superstar
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
9,012
Reputation
-7,768
Daps
12,690
There are lots of teams who would beat 90s bulls, like shaq and kobe lakers, and todays warriors. chuck hating cause they have more rings than him
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,716
Reputation
8,798
Daps
226,000
One of the worst posts I've ever seen
Honestly most of these posts are pretty bad in this thread. Dudes seem to think Rodman was this lockdown, on the perimeter, in-your-pocket type defender in Chicago. All this revisionism and nostalgia makes it impossible to have a reasonable discussion.
 
Joined
May 14, 2015
Messages
1,200
Reputation
70
Daps
1,458

74-75 era Rick Barry was better than Harrison Barnes. Prime Rick Barry was a Larry Bird level type of player. Keith "Jamal" Wilkes was a rookie that was already entering his prime in the mid 70s. Prime Jamal Wilkes was just as good a player as Draymond Green is currently today, and Clifford Ray and George Johnson are both much better centers than Andrew Bogut and Festus Ezeli. 70s championship Warriors would hold they're own against Curry's Warriors. Curry's Warriors lost to the freaking Buck's front court.
 

joe cool

Pro
Joined
Jan 18, 2015
Messages
839
Reputation
-390
Daps
1,474
Does Barkley realize those Bulls teams didn't play big either? They were never built around some dominant center or power forward. In fact those teams were similar to this Warriors team. (Jordan Pippen Rodman) (Curry Thompson Green)
 
Joined
May 14, 2015
Messages
1,200
Reputation
70
Daps
1,458
Does Barkley realize those Bulls teams didn't play big either? They were never built around some dominant center or power forward. In fact those teams were similar to this Warriors team. (Jordan Pippen Rodman) (Curry Thompson Green)

Bill Cartwright and Luc Longley were no Allstars, but they were still solid role playing 7 foot centers that protected the paint. Luc Longley was a bum, but Jordan knew how to get him open looks in the post.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,716
Reputation
8,798
Daps
226,000
74-75 era Rick Barry was better than Harrison Barnes. Prime Rick Barry was a Larry Bird level type of player. Keith "Jamal" Wilkes was a rookie that was already entering his prime in the mid 70s. Prime Jamal Wilkes was just as good a player as Draymond Green is currently today, and Clifford Ray and George Johnson are both much better centers than Andrew Bogut and Festus Ezeli. 70s championship Warriors would hold they're own against Curry's Warriors. Curry's Warriors lost to the freaking Buck's front court.
There's A LOT of wild shyt in this post, but the bold has to be the most disingenuous point of them all.
 
Top