FreedS[ohh]lave
Banned
Dodgers still dont have a reliable starter who scares you after Kershaw ..If you gonna go all in and take on this amount of money id only do it if a stud pitcher was involved
i assume taking on Crawford's contract was a must for BOS to do this, that is risky but the other 2 really arent. A Gon always produces and Beckett had a 2.89 ERA as recently as last year. wouldnt surprise me at all if he pitched well for them
Crawford
A Gon
Kemp
Ethier
Hanley
thats insane if Carl ever comes back to a shell of his old self
where did you see that bytch at?Funny I ran into Jamie McCourt yesterday
I was going to ask her what she thought about this trade.
FreedS[ohh]lave;1281989 said:Nah i think it was mostly Beckett that was a must for BOS and the guy the Dodgers wanted the least
Crawford only 30 he gonna come back strong he just isnt built for Boston neither is Gonzalez..
Becketts a shell of his former self hes 32 and each year loses more velocity..
where did you see that bytch at?
Sorry, I enjoy watching good baseball, not this atrocity they have been putting out everyday. Going through the motions mother fukkers. Why should I care, invest money, time, and whatever else if they don't care themselves? Do I want them to win? fukk yes. Well they win with how they are built now? fukk no. I'm glad someone showed some balls for the first time in three years and did something.
Who the fukk enjoys watching baseball if they have a shytty ass team?
Yeah, they care more so than the guys making more money.
Enjoy getting beat down 100+ games a year in the next 3 years.
How good is this kid?Next year Puig will be in Lf and Crawford will be traded for some pitching
Next year Puig will be in Lf and Crawford will be traded for some pitching
Who the fuck is gonna trade pitching for Carl Crawford and that awful contract? GTFOH.
Like you never heard of a luxury tax/revenue sharing?
Everybody fukking eats.