Do you believe that Christianity is needed for society to function at peak levels?

Seoul Gleou

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
11,468
Reputation
5,499
Daps
77,338
Reppin
McDowell's
You did by using the word repressed.
Learn what repress and anti mean.

Here are examples of science repressing scientific advances

1. **Galileo Galilei**: The most famous example is the case of Galileo Galilei, who was tried by the Roman Catholic Church for advocating heliocentrism, the view that the Earth orbits the Sun. This view was contrary to the Church's geocentric teachings at the time. Galileo was placed under house arrest, and his works were censored Copernicus, Galileo, and the Church: Science in a Religious World

2. **Giordano Bruno**: Bruno was executed by the Roman Inquisition, and his case is often cited as an example of the Church's repression of scientific ideas.

Now it's your turn. Prove that the above didn't happen and Christianity didn't repress scientific breakthroughs :unimpressed:
 

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,427
Reputation
191
Daps
17,464
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
That's another silly stereotype. Georges Lemaître knew WAY more science than you do, breh. Newton, Copernicus, Mendel, Galileo, Bacon, they knew more than enough science to know that people don't raise from the dead or walk on water via natural means. Scientific knowledge doesn't have anything to do with whether you believe in Christianity or not.

The break between the scientific community and Christianity started in the late 1800s / early 1900s due to a culture war between certain athiest Darwinians (who had already been atheists before Darwin's theory was ever published) and certain Christian Fundamentalists (who had already been theologically wrong before evolution ever became part of it). The Darwinists worked as hard as possible to make scientific communities unwelcoming to Christians regardless of what those Christians believed about evolution, and the fundamentalists worked to make Christians antagonistic to science. It was those social reasons, not any meaningful scientific knowledge, that began causing the disconnect.
It’s impossible to believe the Old Testament is factual and believe in science. How do you reconcile Noah’s Ark? The universe being created in 6 days? There being 4 corners of the earth? Earth being created before the sun?

Galileo was catholic because of the time period he was born in. The catholic church persecuted him because of his scientific research.

To be quite frank the biblical God doesn’t make any logical sense
 
Last edited:

ReasonableMatic

................................
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
16,314
Reputation
6,368
Daps
101,315
Learn what repress and anti mean.

Here are examples of science repressing scientific advances

1. **Galileo Galilei**: The most famous example is the case of Galileo Galilei, who was tried by the Roman Catholic Church for advocating heliocentrism, the view that the Earth orbits the Sun. This view was contrary to the Church's geocentric teachings at the time. Galileo was placed under house arrest, and his works were censored Copernicus, Galileo, and the Church: Science in a Religious World

2. **Giordano Bruno**: Bruno was executed by the Roman Inquisition, and his case is often cited as an example of the Church's repression of scientific ideas.

Now it's your turn. Prove that the above didn't happen and Christianity didn't repress scientific breakthroughs :unimpressed:


Neil DeGrasse Tyson had a whole interview going IN on Christianity repressing breakthroughs in science.

Galileo was one of the examples that he used.
(I’m not gonna spend my time looking for that shyt, it’s out there)

Nobody defends their oppressors from being held accountable for their actions than nikkas SMH

Ole “thanks Massa for bringing Abrahamic religions to save our souls in exchange for being enslaved” ass nikkas
 

Capitol

Did this work
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
14,507
Reputation
1,508
Daps
33,532
Christianity is literally reason why humanity haven’t ascended into a higher level of consciousness… we would be traveling the cosmos right now at will if it wasn’t for religion holding back human progress
You mean with physical inventions ? Or some kind of Astral travel ?
 

Seoul Gleou

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
11,468
Reputation
5,499
Daps
77,338
Reppin
McDowell's


Neil DeGrasse Tyson had a whole interview going IN on Christianity repressing breakthroughs in science.

Galileo was one of the examples that he used.

(I’m not gonna spend my time looking for that shyt, it’s out there)

Nobody defends their oppressors from being held accountable for their actions than nikkas SMH

Ole “thanks Massa for bringing Abrahamic religions to save our souls in exchange for being enslaved” ass nikkas

Really interesting seeing negroes cape for institutions that literally enslaved their ancestors and changed a book to justify it :mjpls:
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,630
Reputation
8,094
Daps
121,493
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
It’s impossible to believe the Old Testament is factual and believe in science. How do you reconcile Noah’s Ark? The universe being created in 6 days? There being 4 corners of the earth? Earth being created before the sun?
You don't have to reconcile them as their purpose wasn't scientific, but 'spiritual'.​
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,630
Reputation
8,094
Daps
121,493
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Really interesting seeing negroes cape for institutions that literally enslaved their ancestors
You mean like the Mali Empire in Africa?​
and changed a book to justify it :mjpls:
Luckily there are ancient manuscripts that show where the changes were and they don't alter the message at all.​
 

Seoul Gleou

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
11,468
Reputation
5,499
Daps
77,338
Reppin
McDowell's
You mean like the Mali Empire in Africa?

Luckily there are ancient manuscripts that show where the changes were and they don't alter the message at all.​
Thank God we can ignore the Slave Bible because the Old Testament exists. All those dead and beaten enslaved people can rest easy :smugbiden:
 

ReasonableMatic

................................
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
16,314
Reputation
6,368
Daps
101,315
KOONS stay exposing they don’t believe Africa had knowledge and sophistication before Islam and Christianity came there.

You KOONS really believe our Ancestors were savages until colonialism and slavery civilized us, just like Massa taught you SMH.

Lost Nikkas

IMG-7794.jpg
 

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,427
Reputation
191
Daps
17,464
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
You don't have to reconcile them as their purpose wasn't scientific, but 'spiritual'.​
Yes you do. You can’t just wave it away as an allegory when no where in the Bible does it say don’t take these stories as literal.

Those stories aren’t congruent with science that’s why cope is used to explain it away.
 
Top