Do we miss the BCS

Silkk

Thats My Quarterback :to:
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
199,480
Reputation
20,622
Daps
504,023
When did you start to learn to read? He said "BCS", which is why I wrote my clarification question post, to which you replied "when did you start watching CFB?"
Step your comprehension up breh
 

Turk

Young, Gifted, and Black
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
23,616
Reputation
12,038
Daps
132,785
Reppin
Southside
D1 FBS football fans are the only group of fans that complain about "too many teams" being in the playoffs and that shyt always baffles me. Every other level of football has a real playoff system with more than 12 teams but nikkas would prefer the bullshyt that's been going on in D1 fbs football for ages. Games should actually be decided on the field instead of imaginary scenarios that folks seem to love so much. How y'all complaining about more football?:scust:
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
394
Reputation
70
Daps
629
Hell naw.

Ain’t no way I was watching Tulane vs Memphis back in the BCS era. But this year that was an exciting matchup.
This isn't necessarily true. Boise St. was able to come up in the BCS Era. Besides, rather it be playoff or BCS, the chances those two programs get close to competing for a Natty isn't high. At least Boise St. won a Sugar Bowl
 

Left.A1

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
20,888
Reputation
1,059
Daps
56,172
All you nikkas do is sit up and complain like a nagging ass bytch :mjlol: you had 15-20 teams all playing meaningful football well into November due to the playoff and you got this nikka talking about the regular reason doesn't mean as much and you want a computer to decide lmao
 
Last edited:

The_Sheff

A Thick Sauce N*gga
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
25,979
Reputation
5,066
Daps
119,082
Reppin
ATL to MEM
This isn't necessarily true. Boise St. was able to come up in the BCS Era. Besides, rather it be playoff or BCS, the chances those two programs get close to competing for a Natty isn't high. At least Boise St. won a Sugar Bowl

In the previous system you couldnt just come up one year as an outsider. You damn near had to have a 3 year run before they would take you seriously.

They would never be in the title game under the BCS and they had a slight chance under the 4 team playoff. Under the current system those Boise teams would have had a legit chance to prove themselves on the field.

I’m glad that we don’t have to do all that make believe comparison shyt anymore. Teams have a chance now to prove themselves.

It’s not just about who wins the title. Being able to go into a living room and honestly tell a kid they can play for it all at your school, and legit mean it, means a lot in recruiting.
 

charknicks

All Star
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,026
Reputation
385
Daps
10,723
To answer the question, no, no one misses the BCS. And there is no way the BCS would work in todays NIL climate.

Just compare last year to this year. Imagine the amount of kids that would have hit the transfer portal in October and November, knowing their team cant reach the Top 2 or 4 and would not risk playing anymore. This regular season has been much better this year due to the ability for more teams to still be in the chase.
 

ECA

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,972
Reputation
964
Daps
19,592
Reppin
NULL
This isn't necessarily true. Boise St. was able to come up in the BCS Era. Besides, rather it be playoff or BCS, the chances those two programs get close to competing for a Natty isn't high. At least Boise St. won a Sugar Bowl
Boise State had no chance at being ranked high enough to legitimately compete for a natty back then. January bowls are cool but having a shot to get to the big dance is better.
 

Lucky_Lefty

Dreams Are Colder Than Death...
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,264
Reputation
6,240
Daps
122,030
Reppin
Purgatory
nikkas say they hate the BCS but it got it right more often than wrong. Only thing "equitable" is the G5 schools get in and get a shot to get blown out in R1. MWC Boise State and TCU wish they had this system.
 
Top