Do the Olympics finally prove that Race has little to do with athleticism??

Maschine_Man

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
14,526
Reputation
-5,555
Daps
16,077
so when i say a white person did better than me on a test score cause of genetics and my black ass had to work harder....ain't that the same thing If i don't give white people credit for being smart do to hard-work, right?

ain't that a backhand diss against whites? ain't i saying white people don't live up to they potentia mentally?



It all can be flipped. I hope people say whites are smarter than blacks...makes it more embarassing for them everytime we out-smart them on a level playing field acasdemically.

but no one is saying that, I'M not saying that.

and anyone that does say that is just as ignorant as anyone that says otherwise
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Messages
2,565
Reputation
-30
Daps
2,661
Reppin
respect, usa
CACs are at it again?:mindblown:

The only thing that the Olympics prove is that with dedication,hard-work,and training....you can possibly do anything. Now if we were to have these match ups between your average joes who don't train year round for these games then it will be more lopsided and farther prove race is a factor.

Everyday life and experiences are better to measure the is race a factor debate than a 4 year training and then competition that we call Olympics . Blacks are by far the superior athlete.

Whites and Asian mostly dominate sports that require more technique than athletic skill. Rowing, ping pong, gymnastics, ect... are all examples of this because with a lot of practice and dedication most average joes can accomplish these same feats.

Black however dominate sports that lean toward natural ability than techniques. !00m sprint for example....Say you run a 12 sec 100m sprint. All the training,hard-working, and techniques in the world couldn't help you improve your time to get a 10 sec 100m. Because it has more to do with your natural born ability

:heh:10,000 meters is an athletic event. It has more to do with endurance and training than athletic ability


:wtf:

Probably the worst post in this thread.
 

chineebai

Superstar
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
11,655
Reputation
1,141
Daps
32,971
Reppin
NULL
The Olympics gave recognition to snooker as a sport what they deem is not always credible.

Now when Golf returns in 2016 that will be something cause those debates are always worth hearing not fukking Ping Pong.

snookers it not an olympic sport currently. Where is the confusion? Why do people keep bringing up non ping pong sports, if it is a sport in the olympics then obviously people consider it a sport. If you, by personal preference or whatever reason consider it not to be a sport, then so be it, but it is a sport.
 

Maschine_Man

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
14,526
Reputation
-5,555
Daps
16,077
CACs are at it again?:mindblown:

The only thing that the Olympics prove is that with dedication,hard-work,and training....you can possibly do anything. Now if we were to have these match ups between your average joes who don't train year round for these games then it will be more lopsided and farther prove race is a factor.

Everyday life and experiences are better to measure the is race a factor debate than a 4 year training and then competition that we call Olympics . Blacks are by far the superior athlete.

Whites and Asian mostly dominate sports that require more technique than athletic skill. Rowing, ping pong, gymnastics, ect... are all examples of this because with a lot of practice and dedication most average joes can accomplish these same feats.

Black however dominate sports that lean toward natural ability than techniques. !00m sprint for example....Say you run a 12 sec 100m sprint. All the training,hard-working, and techniques in the world couldn't help you improve your time to get a 10 sec 100m. Because it has more to do with your natural born ability

:heh:10,000 meters is an athletic event. It has more to do with endurance and training than athletic ability

ATHLETIC ABILITY IS MORE THAN JUST RUNNING FOR 100M!!!!!!

why wasn't there any blacks in winning the 100m or 50m freein the pool??


why the fukk do ppl keep bringing that up???



Its just ignorance



Environment and background has more to do with it than race


if race was the reason that blacks dominate at the 100m race then where the fukk are all the african sprinters??
 

chineebai

Superstar
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
11,655
Reputation
1,141
Daps
32,971
Reppin
NULL
CACs are at it again?:mindblown:

The only thing that the Olympics prove is that with dedication,hard-work,and training....you can possibly do anything. Now if we were to have these match ups between your average joes who don't train year round for these games then it will be more lopsided and farther prove race is a factor.

Everyday life and experiences are better to measure the is race a factor debate than a 4 year training and then competition that we call Olympics . Blacks are by far the superior athlete.

Whites and Asian mostly dominate sports that require more technique than athletic skill. Rowing, ping pong, gymnastics, ect... are all examples of this because with a lot of practice and dedication most average joes can accomplish these same feats.



Black however dominate sports that lean toward natural ability than techniques. !00m sprint for example....Say you run a 12 sec 100m sprint. All the training,hard-working, and techniques in the world couldn't help you improve your time to get a 10 sec 100m. Because it has more to do with your natural born ability

:heh:10,000 meters is an athletic event. It has more to do with endurance and training than athletic ability

So 100m is more natural ability, but 100m x 100m is more about endurance and training? First of all, 100M is also a ton of training and endurance, and since when was endurance not a natural ability? So people have more lung capacity, some people have stronger muscle fibers, etc. Then what's the 200m? So basically anything higher than 100m is just endurance and any average joe can do it
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Messages
2,565
Reputation
-30
Daps
2,661
Reppin
respect, usa
So 100m is more natural ability, but 100m x 100m is more about endurance and training? First of all, 100M is also a ton of training and endurance, and since when was endurance not a natural ability? So people have more lung capacity, some people have stronger muscle fibers, etc. Then what's the 200m? So basically anything higher than 100m is just endurance and any average joe can do it

:russ:

Lol there is no rational response to that post.
 

Texas2step

H-Town it's NOT our year
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
3,770
Reputation
-416
Daps
6,369
ATHLETIC ABILITY IS MORE THAN JUST RUNNING FOR 100M!!!!!!

why wasn't there any blacks in winning the 100m or 50m freein the pool??


why the fukk do ppl keep bringing that up???



Its just ignorance



Environment and background has more to do with it than race


if race was the reason that blacks dominate at the 100m race then where the fukk are all the african sprinters??

Running, jumping, and quickness are natural born abilities. Yes you can improve them by training but only slightly. Environment and background has a lot to do with which sports a person chooses to participate in but it doesn't mean they would be better if all had the same opportunity. In events like 100m ect.. you either fast or you not
 

StatUS

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
29,471
Reputation
1,984
Daps
65,189
Reppin
Everywhere
snookers it not an olympic sport currently. Where is the confusion? Why do people keep bringing up non ping pong sports, if it is a sport in the olympics then obviously people consider it a sport. If you, by personal preference or whatever reason consider it not to be a sport, then so be it, but it is a sport.
So the 10 meter air rifle is a sport now because it's in the Olympics :laff:
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Messages
2,565
Reputation
-30
Daps
2,661
Reppin
respect, usa
ATHLETIC ABILITY IS MORE THAN JUST RUNNING FOR 100M!!!!!!

why wasn't there any blacks in winning the 100m or 50m freein the pool??


why the fukk do ppl keep bringing that up???



Its just ignorance



Environment and background has more to do with it than race


if race was the reason that blacks dominate at the 100m race then where the fukk are all the african sprinters
??

Let's just focus on this for a minute. I posted earlier about how Kenyans and Ethiopians treat distance running like Americans treat Basketball and Football. Like Canadians treat Hockey.

Us Americans don't care about anything outside of the 100,200 and 400, especially African Americans. Most of the brothas who ran these events in high school were trying to get faster for fall football season. Look at all the African American distance runners....


Exactly there are none! Culturally that shh is :scusthov: to us.


Just like swimming.

Just like badminton.

Shall I continue?
 

Texas2step

H-Town it's NOT our year
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
3,770
Reputation
-416
Daps
6,369
So 100m is more natural ability, but 100m x 100m is more about endurance and training? First of all, 100M is also a ton of training and endurance, and since when was endurance not a natural ability? So people have more lung capacity, some people have stronger muscle fibers, etc. Then what's the 200m? So basically anything higher than 100m is just endurance and any average joe can do it

so the 10,000m is not an endurance based race? I just used the 100m as an example. You can always improve your lung capacity
 

J-Fire

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
6,701
Reputation
-1,381
Daps
7,683
Reppin
NULL
Let's just focus on this for a minute. I posted earlier about how Kenyans and Ethiopians treat distance running like Americans treat Basketball and Football. Like Canadians treat Hockey.

Us Americans don't care about anything outside of the 100,200 and 400, especially African Americans. Most of the brothas who ran these events in high school were trying to get faster for fall football season. Look at all the African American distance runners....


Exactly there are none! Culturally that shh is :scusthov: to us.


Just like swimming.

Just like badminton.

Shall I continue?



American culture is american culture. we have people that can compete at all distances! we seperating races now for olypmics?!??! :snoop: I don't remember seeing any african american team...the all say USA!
 

Texas2step

H-Town it's NOT our year
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
3,770
Reputation
-416
Daps
6,369
Let's just focus on this for a minute. I posted earlier about how Kenyans and Ethiopians treat distance running like Americans treat Basketball and Football. Like Canadians treat Hockey.

Us Americans don't care about anything outside of the 100,200 and 400, especially African Americans. Most of the brothas who ran these events in high school were trying to get faster for fall football season. Look at all the African American distance runners....


Exactly there are none! Culturally that shh is :scusthov: to us.


Just like swimming.

Just like badminton.

Shall I continue?


My point exactly. These games doesn't prove ish about race being a factor. So that is why is disagreed with the OP.

But sports where technique and training <<<<athletic ability are most important....Black dominate
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Messages
2,565
Reputation
-30
Daps
2,661
Reppin
respect, usa
so the 10,000m is not an endurance based race? I just used the 100m as an example. You can always improve your lung capacity

And once you improve you lung capacity to be able to run a certain distance the next question is can run that distance fast.

I don't doubt the average person can't work their way up to running 26.2 miles or 6.2 miles but being able to run sub 35 minutes in 6.2 miles and under 2:30 for a full marathon takes talent you fool and years of training.

I bet at your current fitness you couldn't run 6.2 miles under 40 minutes and I'm being generous. Hell make that 43 minutes. Could you keep a 7 minute mile pace for 6 miles?

You need to learn the difference between Anaerobic and Aerobic.
 
Top