Diddy’s lawyer reviewed 9 freak off tapes and said Cassie appears to be happy, enjoying herself & dominant/in control

[re'up]

The prosecution is going to hold back their hands for as long as they can. But, yeah that's for sure a defense lawyers strategy.

All or most sex requires some reasonable level of performance, of knowing that another person can hear you and see you, but when you are on camera, and being paid, or coerced in some way, that adds a layer to it. She was with male escorts, having sex, while Puff watched for his own pleasure.

Defense says it looked like she enjoyed it

Prosecutors say she was under threat of violence if she didn't perform to defendants liking. Think of like GIRLSDOORN case.

Why did they finish the video? They wouldn't be paid if they didn't.

 

[Solo_87]

I think the video may not show force. Probably just sex. But the hotel beating video is all you need to imply she had no choice

All depends

She had her own place at the time of their relationship and was freely moving around


If the hotel beating happened after the sex could argue it was just a domestic dispute turned ugly

Diddy was the guest at the hotel and Cassie his then girlfriend was visiting him

But don't think the hotel beating video is going to be allowed into evidence tho

 

[OJ Simpsom]

F R E A K DIDDY

 

[MicIsGod]

All depends

She had her own place at the time of their relationship and was freely moving around


If the hotel beating happened after the sex could argue it was just a domestic dispute turned ugly

Diddy was the guest at the hotel and Cassie his then girlfriend was visiting him

But don't think the hotel beating video is going to be allowed into evidence tho

Why wouldn’t it? Who do you think leaked it I’m sure a lawyer would maybe go your route but that’s just not a good angle.

 

[Fani Willis fan]

Let the public decide for themselves

 

[Rembrandt]

Prosecutors say she was under threat of violence if she didn't perform to defendants liking. Think of like GIRLSDOORN case

Can definitely see that being a precedent

 

[Formerly known as...]

Can the tapes determine if these people were drugged or not though?

9 of how many though?

 

[Formerly known as...]

It's going to be a wild case but for the prosecution it's going to tough to prove those on tape didn't want to be there!

 

[ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA]

 

[bourgeoisie tall freak]

No evidence needed but word of mouth? Thats usually how defenses loses cases, especially when the defendant waited 20+ years to come forward.

in real life the court system is not like forensic files, law and order, or whatever tv drama. the majority of cases don't have videos, they are testimony and circumstancial evidence based. @MeachTheMonster

think about it. people just don't go around planning and committing crimes while videotaping from day 1 to the day they get arrested. you have to be able to think critically to hear a case and not need everything showed to you in 4k to make a conviction. and convictions happen all the time still.

 

[eastside313]

There was a flood of misinformation that came out when he got hemmed up. Lawsuits based on bs, fake news stories, imaginary victims.l, child abuse, gang rapes, kidnapping. Tons of press based on hearsay.

You could even argue that the tape of him beating Cassie was put out there to prejudice the jury.

I don’t think any of that should be necessary if he’s guilty. Even if we don’t like the person.

They destroyed puff public image and made him sell his companies. Now they bout to try to drain as much money outta him as possible with this trial.


And out of all the 1000s hours video and the secret cameras and drugging and rapes all they turn over is a couple sextapes of puff and Cassie


This is why you got a United States attorney getting on tv playing twitter games talkin about baby oil and freak offs.

 

[Solo_87]

Why wouldn’t it? Who do you think leaked it I’m sure a lawyer would maybe go your route but that’s just not a good angle.

I wanna say the feds

Remember Diddys team was trying to get it thrown basis of it tainting the jury pool

Sean “Diddy” Combs Moves to Suppress Evidence of Cassie Assault Video

Lawyers for the hip-hop mogul claim that the government leaked footage of Combs beating the singer to secure a grand jury indictment.

www.hollywoodreporter.com

I see now the motion was denied last month

Diddy Denied Evidentiary Hearing as He Fails to Prove Feds Leaked Cassie Hotel Tape

Judge Arun Subramanian denied the music mogul's latest motion for additional discovery and an evidentiary hearing

www.thewrap.com

Nevermind

 

[MeachTheMonster]

in real life the court system is not like forensic files, law and order, or whatever tv drama. the majority of cases don't have videos, they are testimony and circumstancial evidence based. @MeachTheMonster

He’s charged with racketeering, a financial crime. They literally need evidence of structured crime, threats, payments, etc.

A freak off video was never gonna show any of that, unless diddy was on the video confessing or kicking someone’s ass.

The videos exist at this point to make diddy look bad to the jury. But they are still gonna need some actual evidence to convict him of organized crime.

 

[Consigliere]

They destroyed puff public image and made him sell his companies. Now they bout to try to drain as much money outta him as possible with this trial.


And out of all the 1000s hours video and the secret cameras and drugging and rapes all they turn over is a couple sextapes of puff and Cassie


This is why you got a United States attorney getting on tv playing twitter games talkin about baby oil and freak offs.

Yup. The FBI has been watching him since the 90’s and this is what they’re coming with?

 

[bourgeoisie tall freak]

He’s charged with racketeering, a financial crime. They literally need evidence of structured crime, threats, payments, etc.

A freak off video was never gonna show any of that, unless diddy was on the video confessing or kicking someone’s ass.

The videos exist at this point to make diddy look bad to the jury. But they are still gonna need some actual evidence to convict him of organized crime.

if their is prostitutes in the video, that's it. but they don't even need a video to prove that part.